Browsing by Author "Drastig K"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3

A Review of Nutritional Water Productivity (NWP) in Agriculture: Why It Is Promoted and How It Is Assessed?
(MDPI (Basel, Switzerland), 2023-12-14) Drastig K; Singh R; Telesca F-M; Carra SZ; Jordan J; Orange D
Assessment of nutritional water productivity (NWP) combines a metric of crop or livestock production per unit water consumed and human nutritional value of the food produced. As such, it can rationalize the use of scarce water for a portfolio of crop and livestock production systems that jointly match human nutritional needs and reduce water scarcity impacts. However, a comprehensive search and review of 40 NWP studies highlighted that current NWP studies vary widely in terms of their methodological approaches, the data and tools used and the water flows and nutrient content accounted for. Most of the studies accounted for evapotranspiration stemming from precipitation and technical water, and/or inclusion of the withdrawn technical water. Water scarcity was only addressed in four studies. The reported NWP values also varied for accounting of macro- (energy, protein, fat and carbohydrates) and micro-nutrient (minerals and vitamins) content. The methodological differences, however, severely limit the informative value of reported NWP values. A multidisciplinary research effort is required to further develop standardized metrics for NWP, including its local environmental water scarcity impacts. A robust NWP analysis framework in agriculture should focus on the integration of assessments of NWP and water scarcity impact (WSI), and development of more field measurements and locally calibrated and validated agrohydrological and farm production models to quantify reliable NWP values and their associated WSI of agriculture production systems worldwide.
Building consensus on water use assessment of livestock production systems and supply chains: Outcome and recommendations from the FAO LEAP Partnership
(Elsevier B.V., 2021-01-23) Boulay A-M; Drastig K; Amanullah; Chapagain A; Charlon V; Civit B; DeCamillis C; De Souza M; Hess T; Hoekstra AY; Ibidhi R; Lathuillière MJ; Manzardo A; McAllister T; Morales RA; Motoshita M; Palhares JCP; Pirlo G; Ridoutt B; Russo V; Salmoral G; Singh R; Vanham D; Wiedemann S; Zheng W; Pfister S
The FAO Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance (LEAP) Partnership organised a Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to develop reference guidelines on water footprinting for livestock production systems and supply chains. The mandate of the TAG was to i) provide recommendations to monitor the environmental performance of feed and livestock supply chains over time so that progress towards improvement targets can be measured, ii) be applicable for feed and water demand of small ruminants, poultry, large ruminants and pig supply chains, iii) build on, and go beyond, the existing FAO LEAP guidelines and iv) pursue alignment with relevant international standards, specifically ISO 14040 (2006)/ISO 14044 (2006), and ISO 14046 (2014). The recommended guidelines on livestock water use address both impact assessment (water scarcity footprint as defined by ISO 14046, 2014) and water productivity (water use efficiency). While most aspects of livestock water use assessment have been proposed or discussed independently elsewhere, the TAG reviewed and connected these concepts and information in relation with each other and made recommendations towards comprehensive assessment of water use in livestock production systems and supply chains. The approaches to assess the quantity of water used for livestock systems are addressed and the specific assessment methods for water productivity and water scarcity are recommended. Water productivity assessment is further advanced by its quantification and reporting with fractions of green and blue water consumed. This allows the assessment of the environmental performance related to water use of a livestock-related system by assessing potential environmental impacts of anthropogenic water consumption (only “blue water”); as well as the assessment of overall water productivity of the system (including “green” and “blue water” consumption). A consistent combination of water productivity and water scarcity footprint metrics provides a complete picture both in terms of potential productivity improvements of the water consumption as well as minimizing potential environmental impacts related to water scarcity. This process resulted for the first time in an international consensus on water use assessment, including both the life-cycle assessment community with the water scarcity footprint and the water management community with water productivity metrics. Despite the main focus on feed and livestock production systems, the outcomes of this LEAP TAG are also applicable to many other agriculture sectors.
Review of Water Use Assessment in Livestock Production Systems and Supply Chains
(MDPI (Basel, Switzerland), 2025-10-01) Drastig K; Singh R; Fernandes LFS
Improving the water productivity and sustainability of global food supplies and reducing water stress worldwide requires a comprehensive and consistent assessment of water use in global food production systems, including livestock production and supply chains. Presented here is a systematic review of relevant livestock water use studies, published over two periods: “Period 1993–2017” and “Period 2018–2024”, assessing consistency in their approaches and identifying opportunities for advancing and harmonizing the assessment of livestock water use worldwide. However, the review highlights that a comprehensive and consistent assessment of livestock water use remains a challenge. The reviewed studies (a total of 317) differ in terms of their accounting of different water flows, setting the system boundaries, and quantification of water productivity and impact metrics. This makes it difficult to compare potential water productivity and environmental impacts of livestock production systems at different scales and locations. Case studies are required to further develop and implement a robust and consistent methodological approach, based on locally calibrated models and databases, of different livestock production systems in different agroclimatic conditions. Also, further communication and training are required to help build the capability to apply a comprehensive and consistent assessment of livestock water use locally and globally. The adoption of a scientifically robust and practically applicable methodological framework will support researchers, policy managers, farmers, and business leaders in sound decision-making to improve the productivity and sustainability of water use in livestock production systems locally and globally.