Repository logo
    Info Pages
    Content PolicyCopyright & Access InfoDepositing to MRODeposit LicenseDeposit License SummaryFile FormatsTheses FAQDoctoral Thesis Deposit
    Communities & Collections
    All of MRO
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
Log In
New user? Click here to register using a personal email and password.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Drew, John Errol"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Social work supervision : a political function : a critique of cognitive interests and the impact of the capitalist welfare state : Master of Social Work thesis, Massey University
    (Massey University, 1987) Drew, John Errol
    Social work supervisory practice is motivated and conditioned by political intent. For behind all supervisory theories, modes of practice, cognitive interests and interpretations of human social existence lie the ideological perspectives of the actors whether these are revealed explicitly or implicitly. Ideological perspectives affect and shape social welfare policies, organisations and agencies, therefore social work exists and functions in a political context, likewise supervisory practice. The content or functions of supervision are never a-political nor is supervision a neutral scientific practice. Rather what is done, or not done, is highly a political act. The proposition that social work supervision is a political activity has not been argued by the numerous authors whose works have been critically reviewed as a background to this thesis. Such a proposition, however, is to argue an irrefutable hypothesis. This thesis, therefore, examines how social work supervision is a political activity driven by different cognitive interests and conditioned by its existence in a capitalist, social welfare, state. To critically debate this, the writer has used the Habermasian typology of alternative scientific traditions and different modes of practice. This provides a theoretical framework to canvass three different supervisory models and to critically examine supervision in New Zealand. The argument then in this thesis, is that three supervisory models exist: the apprenticeship model, the professional model and the radical model. The first two models have their genesis in the historical-hermeneutic and empirical-analytic scientific traditions, which in turn can be located in the functionalist orientation or the market orientation of capitalist societies. The radical model has its genesis in the critical-emancipatory scientific tradition which in turn can be located in the social/marxist paradigm. It is only this, third approach, that can claim to be explicitly political, maintaining the prime function of supervision is political activity. The other two approaches remain implicitly political for they act to ensure the continuation and maintenance of the capitalist welfare state.

Copyright © Massey University  |  DSpace software copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS

  • Contact Us
  • Copyright Take Down Request
  • Massey University Privacy Statement
  • Cookie settings
Repository logo COAR Notify