Journal Articles
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/7915
Browse
4 results
Search Results
Item Policy Versus Practice: School Food Practices Do Not Reflect Healthy Food Guidance in New Zealand Primary Schools(Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society, 2025-10-20) Pillay D; Ali A; Wham C; Evans CObjective: To examine how school food policies and perceived barriers influence food provision in New Zealand primary school canteens, using the ‘Healthy Food and Drink Guidance for Schools.’ Design: Cross-sectional analyses of school food menus, and school food policy and practices surveys completed by school leaders/principals. Setting: New Zealand primary schools. Participants: 239 primary schools completed the school food policies and practices survey, and 80 schools provided canteen menus. Results: Most schools reported having a healthy food and drink policy in their school (76.2%) and promoted healthy eating during school hours (87.4%). Two-thirds (69.5%) identified barriers to healthy food and drink provision, most commonly the convenience of ready-made foods (39.3%), and resistance from parents (34.3%). The number of reported barriers was not a significant predictor for the presence of a school food policy (OR-1.034, p=0.841). School menus (n=80) consisted of 16.4% ‘green’ items, 34.7% ‘amber’ items, and 36.8% ‘red’ items. There was no relationship between the percentage of ‘green’, ‘amber’, and ‘red’ items and the presence of a school food policy or reported barriers. More than a third (38.9%) of menus from schools that reported they had a ‘Plain Milk and Water’ only policy still contained sugar-sweetened beverages. Conclusions: Although most New Zealand primary schools had healthy food policies, this was not consistently reflected in healthy food items on canteen menus. Further research is needed to understand how systemic barriers, such as cost, convenience, and parental influence, affect policy implementation and school food provision.Item Multi-scalar policy uptake of the six-dimensional food security framework(Elsevier Ltd, 2025-11-01) Clapp J; Moseley WG; Termine P; Burlingame BIn 2022, along with colleagues, we proposed a six-dimensional food security framework in a Food Policy viewpoint article that argued for the need to expand the commonly cited four pillar approach (availability, access, utilization and stability) by adding two additional dimensions: agency and sustainability. The proposal was not just for a new conceptual framework for scholarly analysis, but also for its application in policy settings. Over three years later, we are humbled to see widespread uptake of our call to embrace agency and sustainability as dimensions of food security in multiple tyles of policy settings at different scales. This brief policy comment outlines the growing recognition and application of the six-dimensional framework for food security in policy contexts from the global to the local level. We are hopeful that the growing application of this idea will help to make improvements in the global quest to end hunger.Item Awareness, support, and opinions of healthy food and drink policies: a survey of staff and visitors in New Zealand healthcare organisations.(BioMed Central Ltd, 2024-08-12) Gerritsen S; Rosin M; Te Morenga L; Jiang Y; Kidd B; Shen S; Umali E; Mackay S; Ni Mhurchu CBackground In 2016, a voluntary National Healthy Food and Drink Policy (hereafter, “the Policy”) was released to encourage public hospitals in New Zealand to provide food and drink options in line with national dietary guidelines. Five years later, eight (of 20) organisations had adopted it, with several preferring to retain or update their own institutional-level version. This study assessed staff and visitors’ awareness and support for and against the Policy, and collected feedback on perceived food environment changes since implementation of the Policy. Methods Cross-sectional electronic and paper-based survey conducted from June 2021 to August 2022. Descriptive statistics were used to present quantitative findings. Free-text responses were analysed following a general inductive approach. Qualitative and quantitative findings were compared by level of implementation of the Policy, and by ethnicity and financial security of participants. Results Data were collected from 2,526 staff and 261 visitors in 19 healthcare organisations. 80% of staff and 56% of visitors were aware of the Policy. Both staff and visitors generally supported the Policy, irrespective of whether they were aware of it or not, with most agreeing that “Hospitals should be good role models.” Among staff who opposed the Policy, the most common reason for doing so was freedom of choice. The Policy had a greater impact, positive and negative, on Māori and Pacific staff, due to more frequent purchasing onsite. Most staff noticed differences in the food and drinks available since Policy implementation. There was positive feedback about the variety of options available in some hospitals, but overall 40% of free text comments mentioned limited choice. 74% of staff reported that food and drinks were more expensive. Low-income staff/visitors and shift workers were particularly impacted by reduced choice and higher prices for healthy options. Conclusions The Policy led to notable changes in the healthiness of foods and drinks available in NZ hospitals but this was accompanied by a perception of reduced value and choice. While generally well supported, the findings indicate opportunities to improve implementation of food and drink policies (e.g. providing more healthy food choices, better engagement with staff, and keeping prices of healthy options low) and confirm that the Policy could be expanded to other public workplaces.Item Viewpoint: The case for a six-dimensional food security framework(Elsevier Ltd, 2022-01-12) Clapp J; Moseley WG; Burlingame B; Termine PThe definition of food security has evolved and changed over the past 50 years, including the introduction of the four commonly cited pillars of food security: availability, access, utilization, and stability, which have been important in shaping policy. In this article, we make the case that it is time for a formal update to our definition of food security to include two additional dimensions proposed by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition: agency and sustainability. We show that the impact of widening food system inequalities and growing awareness of the intricate connections between ecological systems and food systems highlight the importance of these additional dimensions to the concept. We further outline the ways in which international policy guidance on the right to food already implies both agency and sustainability alongside the more established four pillars, making it a logical next step to adopt a six dimensional framework for food security in both policy and scholarly settings. We also show that advances have already been made with respect to providing measurements of agency and sustainability as they relate to food insecurity.