Journal Articles

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/7915

Browse

Filters

2022 - 20232

Settings

Has files: YesSubject: search.filters.subject.cerebral autoregulation

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Cerebrovascular and cardiovascular responses to the Valsalva manoeuvre during hyperthermia.
    (John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, 2023-06-18) Perry BG; Korad S; Mündel T
    BACKGROUND: During hyperthermia, the perturbations in mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) produced by the Valsalva manoeuvre (VM) are more severe. However, whether these more severe VM-induced changes in MAP are translated to the cerebral circulation during hyperthermia is unclear. METHODS: Healthy participants (n = 12, 1 female, mean ± SD: age 24 ± 3 years) completed a 30 mmHg (mouth pressure) VM for 15 s whilst supine during normothermia and mild hyperthermia. Hyperthermia was induced passively using a liquid conditioning garment with core temperature measured via ingested temperature sensor. Middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv) and MAP were recorded continuously during and post-VM. Tieck's autoregulatory index was calculated from the VM responses, with pulsatility index, an index of pulse velocity (pulse time) and mean MCAv (MCAvmean ) also calculated. RESULTS: Passive heating significantly raised core temperature from baseline (37.9 ± 0.2 vs. 37.1 ± 0.1°C at rest, p < 0.01). MAP during phases I through III of the VM was lower during hyperthermia (interaction effect p < 0.01). Although an interaction effect was observed for MCAvmean (p = 0.02), post-hoc differences indicated only phase IIa was lower during hyperthermia (55 ± 12 vs. 49.3 ± 8 cm s- 1 for normothermia and hyperthermia, respectively, p = 0.03). Pulsatility index was increased 1-min post-VM in both conditions (0.71 ± 0.11 vs. 0.76 ± 0.11 for pre- and post-VM during normothermia, respectively, p = 0.02, and 0.86 ± 0.11 vs. 0.99 ± 0.09 for hyperthermia p < 0.01), although for pulse time only main effects of time (p < 0.01), and condition (p < 0.01) were apparent. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that the cerebrovascular response to the VM is largely unchanged by mild hyperthermia.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Cerebral autoregulation across the menstrual cycle in eumenorrheic women
    (Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society, 2022-05-06) Korad S; Mündel T; Fan J-L; Perry BG
    There is emerging evidence that ovarian hormones play a significant role in the lower stroke incidence observed in pre-menopausal women compared with men. However, the role of ovarian hormones in cerebrovascular regulation remains to be elucidated. We examined the blood pressure-cerebral blood flow relationship (cerebral autoregulation) across the menstrual cycle in eumenorrheic women (n = 12; mean ± SD: age, 31 ± 7 years). Participants completed sit-to-stand and Valsalva maneuvers (VM, mouth pressure of 40 mmHg for 15 s) during the early follicular (EF), late follicular (LF), and mid-luteal (ML) menstrual cycle phases, confirmed by serum measurement of progesterone and 17β-estradiol. Middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv), arterial blood pressure and partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide were measured. Cerebral autoregulation was assessed by transfer function analysis during spontaneous blood pressure oscillations, rate of regulation (RoR) during sit-to-stand maneuvers, and Tieck's autoregulatory index during VM phases II and IV (AI-II and AI-IV, respectively). Resting mean MCAv (MCAvmean ), blood pressure, and cerebral autoregulation were unchanged across the menstrual cycle (all p > 0.12). RoR tended to be different (EF, 0.25 ± 0.06; LF; 0.19 ± 0.04; ML, 0.18 ± 0.12 sec-1 ; p = 0.07) and demonstrated a negative relationship with 17β-estradiol (R2  = 0.26, p = 0.02). No changes in AI-II (EF, 1.95 ± 1.20; LF, 1.67 ± 0.77 and ML, 1.20 ± 0.55) or AI-IV (EF, 1.35 ± 0.21; LF, 1.27 ± 0.26 and ML, 1.20 ± 0.2) were observed (p = 0.25 and 0.37, respectively). Although, a significant interaction effect (p = 0.02) was observed for the VM MCAvmean response. These data indicate that the menstrual cycle has limited impact on cerebrovascular autoregulation, but individual differences should be considered.