Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLondon, Athena
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-27T00:33:04Z
dc.date.available2017-09-27T00:33:04Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10179/12027
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Predictive early literacy assessments are useful to identify students who are at risk of reading difficulty. This study investigated the use of six early literacy assessments, administered when students first entered school (Time 1), and in the middle of their first year at school (Time 2), in order to predict which students would be selected for Reading Recovery and to identify the Reading Recovery (RR) outcomes for students who participated in the intervention. Method: Unpublished data from a longitudinal study (Early Literacy Project, Chapman, Arrow, Tunmer, & Braid, 2016) was analysed to find predictive links between assessment results and later reading outcomes, for a cohort of 300 5-year-old children in New Zealand primary schools. Results: It was not possible to predict which students would be selected for Reading Recovery due to the variations in RR selection processes. It was found that children who participated in RR were more likely to be referred on for further support the lower their phonological awareness scores were. It was also found that if a child scored 20 points or less, in a combination of Time 1 assessments (letter names, letter sounds and three measures of phonological awareness), they were likely to have a body of literacy abilities that meant they would be working at least a year below the National Standard by the end of their second year at school. Implications: The findings indicate that standardising the selection of students for RR may mean students with the lowest literacy attainment all get support. In addition, early literacy assessments, including measures of phonological awareness, should be administered early in a child’s schooling and those identified as being at risk of reading difficulty should receive literacy support without delay. Addressing students’ low levels of phonological awareness in the first year of schooling may lead to better outcomes for students who participate in RR. Keywords: phonological awareness, Reading Recovery, early literacy assessment, letter names, letter sounds, New Zealand, timing of assessment, vocabularyen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMassey Universityen_US
dc.rightsThe Authoren_US
dc.subjectReadingen_US
dc.subjectAbility testingen_US
dc.subjectRemedial teachingen_US
dc.subjectPhonological awarenessen_US
dc.subjectReading Recoveryen_US
dc.subjectEarly literacy assessmenten_US
dc.subjectLetter soundsen_US
dc.subjectLetter namesen_US
dc.subjectNew Zealanden_US
dc.subjectTiming of assessmenten_US
dc.subjectVocabularyen_US
dc.titlePredicting reading recovery selection and outcomes : is it possible? : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Education (Literacy) at Massey University, Manawatū, New Zealanden_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineLiteracyen_US
thesis.degree.grantorMassey Universityen_US
thesis.degree.levelMastersen_US
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Education (MEd)en_US


Files in this item

Icon
Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record