JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Living under siege : women's narratives of psychological violence within coercively controlling intimate partner relationships : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Psychology at Massey University, Manawatū, New Zealand
As a global epidemic, the violence of women enacted through gendered social power
relations of inequality, exploit, harm, and silence women. Specifically, intimate partner
violence (IPV) constitutes a systematic pattern of coercive control, embedded within
psychological, physical, and/or sexual violence, that intimidates and hurts women through
fear and terror. Although previous literature has identified the debilitating effects of
psychological violence, within our socio-political landscape physical violence continues to
occupy a more visible and privileged position, minimising other forms of violence. The aim
of this research, therefore, was to explore and make visible heterosexual women’s
experiences of psychological violence within previous intimate relationships, framed through
coercive control, to enable a greater understanding of how women become subjected to men’s
coercion and control within intimate relationships. The aim was also to explore how
psychological violence positions women within the gendered social hierarchy. A narrativediscursive
approach analysed the stories of six women subjected to psychological violence
and attended to the discursive resources the women used to narrate their experiences. The
analysis identified how the women’s experiences of heteronormative coupledom developed
into relationships of coercion and control, emphasising their inequitable and subordinate
positions within femininity. Becoming entrapped within a destructive pattern of coercion, the
women’s everyday lives were micro-regulated through their partners’ tactics of intimidation,
isolation, and control and through their own operations of imperceptible disciplinary power.
Importantly, the analysis identified particular turning points of resistance enabling the women
to leave their relationships, however, they continue(d) to live under siege post-separation,
subjected to psychological violence by their ex-partners through the men’s use of both their
children and the legal system. The analysis ends with the women’s reflections on how these
previous relationships continue to currently affect them.