Superior running economy in obese compared to normal-weight males at metabolically comparable work rates : a thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Sport and Exercise at Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand
Loading...
Date
2014
DOI
Open Access Location
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Massey University
Rights
The Author
Abstract
Introduction: During weight bearing physical activities such as walking or running, obese
individuals generally expend more total energy than their lighter counterparts. Running
economy (RE) is an important physiological measure in the sports performance field and is
defined as the aerobic capacity per kilogram of body mass required to sustain a given
submaximal running speed. RE can also help us assess how other individuals would cope
with a certain intensity of activity. Superior RE is seen in elite endurance athletes by using
less oxygen per kilogram of body mass at a given speed. Fit/trained individuals display a
superior RE compared to unfit/untrained individuals. Normal weight subjects have previously
been shown to display a superior RE than obese individuals; furthermore, low
cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is an important reversible cardiovascular disease risk factor,
while obesity is a major risk factor for non-communicable diseases. Although RE has
previously been assessed at absolute exercise intensities to compare between groups, (i.e.
obese vs. normal weight) individuals exercise at a metabolic rate that is scaled to body size
and relativised for fitness level. Purpose: To assess RE and the physiological responses of
normal weight-unfit (NWU) and obese-fit (OBF) adult males during treadmill running when
relative exercise intensities are selected. It was hypothesised that the RE of OBF would be
superior to that observed for NWU. Methods: Healthy NWU (n = 12, 38.2 ± 9.1 yrs, 77.3 ±
6.4 kg, 24.0 ± 1.3 kg·m-2) and OBF (n = 11, 38.5 ± 6.0 yrs, 103.8 ± 8.0 kg, 33.3 ± 2.2 kg·m-2)
volunteered for the study. Following risk stratification assessment for coronary artery disease
and a treadmill walking ECG, participants completed two laboratory based tests. Participants
firstly completed a submaximal incremental graded exercise test up to 85% HRmax (age
predicted) on a treadmill. Individual linear regression analysis was then used to predict
maximal aerobic power ( O2max) for each participant. Following a minimum 72 hour
recovery period, participants then completed a further test at two independent intensities:
ventilatory threshold (VT) and 40% delta (Δ) as identified from the GXT. Each independent
intensity was sustained for 6 minutes duration, separated by 5 minutes of standing recovery.
Physiological markers (Heart Rate [HR], oxygen uptake [ O2], minute ventilation [ E] and
respiratory exchange ratio [RER]) were continuously monitored, while the ratings of
perceived exertion (RPE) and stride rate were recorded at 3 minutes and at the completion of
each exercise stage. Results: OBF elicited a significantly higher running speed at VT (8.5
vs. 7.6 km·h-1; P < 0.01) and at 40% Δ (10.1 vs. 8.8 km·h-1; P < 0.01) compared to NWU
V!
V! V!
Abstract Superior Running Economy in Obese Compared to Normal-Weight Males
respectively. OBF displayed a significantly superior (lower) RE (210.7 ± 8.0 vs. 253.2 ± 7.6
mL·kg-1·km-1; P = 0.001), than in NWU respectively. No significant differences were
observed between VT and 40% Δ (P > 0.05). When RE was assessed relative to fat free mass
(FFM), no differences were found between OBF and NWU (P > 0.05). However, a
significant difference in RE was observed at VT compared to 40% Δ (322.3 ± 7.3 & 368.8 ±
8.9 mL·FFM-1·km-1, respectively; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Despite running at a faster speed,
fit and obese individuals displayed a superior running economy compared to normal weight
unfit individuals during treadmill running at relative moderate and heavy exercise intensities
when expressed as mL·kg-1·km-1. When expressed relative to fat free mass (mL·FFM-1·km-1)
no differences in RE were observed between groups. Fitness and training status rather than
weight status may be more of an important moderating factor when examining differences in
RE between individuals. The proposed mechanisms for the results remain unclear. It is
acknowledges that greater subject numbers including obese unfit and normal weight fit would
have allowed for a more valid interpretation of the present findings. From a public health
perspective these results indicate that increasing physical activity and fitness level should be
a priority for adults engaging in an exercise programme more so than weight loss, as superior
economy could reduce the relative level of physical exertion during everyday tasks.
Description
Keywords
Obese males, Running, Running economy, Fitness level, Physical activity