Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Factors affecting the composition and quality of broccoli juice A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Technology in Food Technology at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. Claire T Petersen Redman 2009 i Abstract A shelf life trial using a fully balanced factorial experimental design was used to analyse the effects of acidity and light on broccoli juice made on a semi commercial scale over an eight week period in simulated retail refrigerated storage conditions. The research focused on making broccoli juice on a pilot scale, and what happens to the colour, composition and flavour during storage. A pilot scale production of pasteurised broccoli juice was conducted and the juice satisfied microbiological safety limits for the eight week shelf life trial in retail storage conditions. The stability of the green colour of fresh broccoli through processing and storage was assessed. Neutral broccoli juice remained green for four weeks before the colour became more yellow. The acidified juice became yellow on acidification and did not change significantly during storage. Dietary fibre and pectin levels did not change during storage. Chlorophyll and carotenoids levels decreased during storage and were directly influencing the colour changes in the juices. Ascorbic acid levels decreased significantly during processing resulting in low ascorbic acid levels (12 - 15 mg /100ml of juice) at the start of the shelf life trial and dropped further to 2-6 mg /100ml of juice after eight weeks. Acidification and storage in the dark had a protective effect on the degradation of ascorbic acid with only a 58% reduction in ascorbic acid levels compared to an 84% reduction in neutral light stored broccoli juice. The effect of processing and storage on the flavour of the beverage was assessed using a trained sensory panel providing descriptive analysis. The sensory profiles for neutral and acidified juices were extremely different with the unbalanced acidity suppressing the perception of the basic tastes, sweet, salty and bitter. The neutral juice sensory profile only changed slightly in aroma attributes during storage for seven weeks. The astringent aftertaste of the acidified juice increased while the broccoli smell decreased during storage. The results from this research indicate that the production of a broccoli juice with a yellow green colour and some retained nutritional components is achievable with a refrigerated (4 °C) shelf life of 30 days in light excluding glass packaging. The neutral juice is recommended as it was greener and had a broccoli flavour. ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisors, Drs Marie Wong, Erin O’Donohgue and Lee Huffman, for their advice, patience, guidance and support throughout this project. Gratitude goes to Plant and Food Research (formerly Crop and Food Research). Their financial support and investment in my research made this possible. To my colleagues Carl Massarotto, Shiji Nair, Virginia Corrigan, Allan Hardacre, Suzanne Clark, Rebecca Zou and Annie Teoh for their tolerance, helpful advice and support. I would like to extend my appreciation to: Erin O’Donohgue and Sheryl Somerfield for their help and guidance with the analytical testing and HPLC analysis and scientific rigor. Garry Radford and Warrick Johnson at Institute of Food Nutrition and Human Health (IFNHH) Palmerston North for their support and help taming the UHT equipment, Malcolm Reeves from EIT for the use of the water press and Kapiti Green Ltd for the generous supply of broccoli. Duncan Hedderly and Andrew McLaughlan for their help and guidance with the statistical analysis. Virginian Corrigan and John Grigor for their advice on the sensory training, assessment and analysis and to the sensory panellists for their dedicated efforts. Ann-Marie Jackson, Laboratory services manager, School of Engineering and Advanced Technology, Massey University, and Weiping Liu, Laboratory Technician, IFNHH, Massey University for the microbial analysis. Lastly but my biggest thanks go to my family for their patience and tolerance, support and sacrifice, especially Stuart and little Jessica whose life to date has revolved around broccoli juice. iii CONTENTS Abstract ......................................................................................... i Acknowledgements ...................................................................... ii List of Tables ................................................................................ v List of Figures .............................................................................. vii Chapter 1 ........................................................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................. 1 Chapter 2 ........................................................................................... 3 Literature review ........................................................................... 3 2.1 Broccoli ....................................................................... 3 2.2 Juice production ....................................................... 13 2.3 Juice safety .............................................................. 23 2.4 Juice visual quality .................................................... 26 2.5 Juice flavour perception ............................................ 31 2.6 Summary .................................................................. 33 Chapter 3 ......................................................................................... 34 Materials and Methods ............................................................... 34 3.1 Juice Production ....................................................... 34 3.2 Shelf life trial conditions and experimental design ..... 41 3.3 Juice analysis ........................................................... 45 Chapter 4 ......................................................................................... 58 Preliminary experiments ............................................................. 58 4.1 Acidification .............................................................. 58 4.2 Pasteurisation ........................................................... 61 Chapter 5 ......................................................................................... 66 Shelf Life Trial Results and Discussion....................................... 66 5.1 Introduction ............................................................... 66 iv 5.2 Processing factors .................................................... 67 5.3 Standard juice properties .......................................... 70 5.4 Composition .............................................................. 77 5.5 Colour ....................................................................... 87 5.6 Sensory Evaluation ................................................... 93 Chapter 6 ....................................................................................... 102 Discussion ................................................................................ 102 6.1 Pilot scale production of broccoli juice .................... 102 6.2 Broccoli juice in a retail environment ....................... 103 Chapter 7 ....................................................................................... 114 Conclusions and recommendations .......................................... 114 7.1 Conclusions ............................................................ 114 7.2 Recommendations .................................................. 115 References ............................................................................... 116 Appendix .................................................................................. 125 v List of Tables Table 2.1 Composition of raw Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) (Athar et al. 2006; FSANZ 2009; USDA 2009) Carbohydrate, (a: by difference, b: available carbohydrates). 5 Table 2.2 Intrinsic and Extrinsic microbial growth factors (Jay 1996; Bari et al. 2005). 25 Table 3.1 Resources used for juice production. 35 Table 3.2 Experimental plan for acidification per 100 g of juice of raw broccoli juice. 37 Table 3.3 Experimental plan for heat treatment optimisation of neutral and acidified broccoli juice pasteurised for 15 sec. 38 Table 3.4 Description of juice required for analysis for each type. 44 Table 3.5 Equipment used in biochemical assays. 47 Table 3.6 Enzymes, chemicals and reagents used in biochemical assays. 48 Table 3.7 Attributes, descriptions and references for neutral and acidified broccoli juice. 55 Table 4.1 The pH, titratable acidity and °Brix of raw broccoli juice acidified with increasing amounts (% w/w) of ascorbic acid or citric acid. 60 Table 4.2 Colour measurements of lightness, chroma and hue angle for raw broccoli juice acidified with increasing concentrations (% w/w) of ascorbic acid or citric acid. 61 Table 4.3 Microbiological test results for neutral and acidified broccoli juice pasteurised for 15 sec at specified temperatures. 63 Table 4.4 Microorganism lethality calculations. 64 Table 4.5 Titratable acidity (g/100ml citric), soluble solids (°Brix) and total chlorophyll (mg/ml) content in neutral and acidified broccoli juice pasteurised for 15 sec at three different temperatures. 65 Table 4.6 Colour measurements, lightness, chroma and hue angle for neutral and acidified broccoli juice pasteurised for 15 sec at different temperatures. 65 Table 5.1 Broccoli juice yield. 68 Table 5.2 Composition of neutral and acidic broccoli juice for the shelf life trial. 68 Table 5.3 Dry matter (g/100ml) of broccoli juice treatments during storage time at 4°C. 70 Table 5.4 Microbiological test results for raw (un-pasteurised) neutral and acidified broccoli juice. 71 Table 5.5 Microbiological test results for neutral and acidified broccoli juice sampled according to the shelf life trial experimental design in Section 3.2. 73 Table 5.6 pH values of broccoli juice treatments following storage at 4°C for the times 75 vi indicated. Table 5.7 Titratable acidity (g citric acid /L) of broccoli juice following storage at 4°C for the times indicated. 76 Table 5.8 Soluble solids (°Brix) of broccoli juice treatments following storage at 4°C for the times indicated. 77 Table 5.9 (mg/100ml) total chlorophyll, chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b for broccoli juice treatments over storage time at 4°C. 84 Table 5.10 ANOVA significant difference (p values) of total chlorophyll, chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b for all neutral or acidified broccoli juice treatments. 84 Table 5.11 Colour values for neutral and acidified broccoli juice in light or dark storage over and eight week period. 90 Table 5.12 Summary of significant attributes from ANOVA for neutral broccoli juice treatments. Significance = p<0.05. 98 Table 5.13a Summary of significant attributes from ANOVA for acidified broccoli juice treatments. Significance= p<0.05. 101 Table 5.13b Summary of significant attributes from ANOVA for acidified broccoli juice treatments. Significance= p<0.05. 102 vii List of Figures Figure 2.1 A broccoli plant with the outer leaves removed before harvesting. 6 Figure 2.2 L-ascorbic acid (AA) and its oxidised form dehydro-L-ascorbic acid (DHAA)(Anon 2009d). 8 Figure 2.3 Glucosinolate breakdown process (Fahey et al. 2001). 9 Figure 2.4 Structure of pectin (Anon 2009e). 12 Figure 2.5 Structure of chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b (Anon 2009d). 29 Figure 2.6 Structure of carotenoids β-Carotene and lutein (Anon 2009d). 31 Figure 3.1 Process flow diagram and pictorial for the production of broccoli juice. 40 Figure 3.2 Shelf life trial full balanced factorial experimental design for refrigerated (4±1°C) storage time in retail lighting conditions. After set time periods juice was frozen at -20±2°C until the experiment was concluded and analyses commenced. 42 Figure 3.3 Intensity scale for rating neutral and acidified broccoli juice. 56 Figure 5.1 Total dietary fibre content (g/ 100ml broccoli juice) for broccoli juice treatments over storage time at 4°C. Data are presented as means ± SE (n=3). 78 Figure 5.2 Pectin content (mg/ml) for broccoli juice treatments over storage time at 4°C. Data are presented as means ± SE (n=3). 80 Figure 5.3 Ascorbic acid (mg/ml) for broccoli juice treatments over storage time at 4°C. Data are presented as means ±SE (n = 3). 81 Figure 5.4 The change in mean total chlorophyll content (mg/100ml) of broccoli juice treatments over storage time at 4°C. Data are presented as means ±SE (n=3). 83 Figure 5.5 Total carotenoids (mg/100ml) for broccoli juice treatments over storage time at 4°C. Data are presented as means ±SE (n=3). 87 Figure 5.6 Photos of broccoli juice shelf life trial treatments. 89 Figure 5.7 Lightness values for broccoli juice treatments over storage time at 4°C. Data are presented as means ± SE (n=6). Values relate to the difference in lightness, with 0 black and 100 = white. 92 Figure 5.8 Chroma values for broccoli juice treatments over storage time at 4°C. Data are presented as means ± SE (n=6). Values increase in purity of hue from 0. 92 Figure 5.9 Hue angle values for broccoli juice treatments over storage time at 4°C. Data are presented as means ± SE (n=6). 60° = yellow, 120° = green. 93 Figure 5.10 ∆E the total colour difference for broccoli juice treatments over storage time at 4°C. Data are presented as means ± SE (n=6). 93 viii Figure 5.11 Spider plot of the sensory profiles of neutral and acidic reference broccoli juices. 95 Figure 5.12 Spider plot of the means for neutral broccoli juice over storage time in weeks. Data is means of duplicate assessments and trained panellists (n=24). 96 Figure 5.13 Spider plot of the means for acidified broccoli juice over storage time in weeks. Data is means of duplicate assessments and trained panellists (n=24). 99 Figure 5.14 Shelf life trial summary of trends. 105