Vol.:(0123456789)1 3 European Food Research and Technology (2022) 248:1311–1319 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-022-03976-2 ORIGINAL PAPER The effects of ageing treatment on bioactive contents and chemical composition of liquid smoke food flavourings Xing Xin1 · Wenyu Zhao1 · Sinemobong Essien1 · Kiri Dell2 · Saeid Baroutian1 Received: 2 December 2021 / Revised: 16 January 2022 / Accepted: 22 January 2022 / Published online: 4 February 2022 © The Author(s) 2022 Abstract Liquid smoke food flavouring is an alternative to traditional food smoking. Ageing treatment of liquid smoke can remove tar to improve a consistent sensory experience but traditionally takes months by storage. This study proposed a thermal treat- ment approach to accelerate the ageing process. Liquid smoke samples from kānuka and hickory woodchips were prepared by fast pyrolysis. The obtained liquid smoke samples were subjected to ageing by storing them at ambient temperature for 18 months. Accelerated ageing of liquid smoke was carried out by heat treatment at 80 °C for 24 and 48 h. Tar formed dur- ing the ageing process, with a yield ranging from 2.2 to 4.1 wt.%. Both ageing treatments resulted in decreases in bioactive content and their activities in terms of total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), ferric reducing antioxidant power assay (FRAP) and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl scavenging activity (DPPH). Chemical composition and principal component analyses indicated that liquid smoke chemical compositions were influenced by wood type and ageing conditions. It was found that thermal treatment at 80 °C for 24 h was sufficient to age liquid smoke. Keywords Liquid smoke · Flavouring · Ageing · Stability · Principal component analysis Introduction Liquid smoke is a food flavouring ingredient derived from woody biomass [1]. Liquid smoking food is fast, safe, and environmental-friendly compared to traditional food smok- ing [2]. Because the concentrations of polyaromatic hydro- carbons, which are dominantly responsible for the toxicity of smoke flavourings [3], can be eliminated or reduced to below the regulation limits before the use. Liquid smoke can be produced by smouldering, carbonisation, or fast pyrolysis processes [4]. It is commonly applied in food industry as a flavouring additive and preservative for meat, cheeses and seafood [5]. Liquid smoke contains many functional com- pounds such as phenolics, flavonoids, acids, furans, and ketones giving the treated food a unique and pleasant woody and smoky flavour and aroma [6]. A market study revealed the global market size of liquid smoke was growing rapidly and had reached 56.5 million USD in 2018 [7]. Some compounds are still chemically active after liquid smoke production, forming tar over a period through factors such as temperature and light [8, 9]. Tar forming in liquid smoke leads to phase separation, which is unpleasant to con- sumers [10]. Hence, liquid smoke is usually stored in a tank for a period after production and is referred to as ageing or stationing. Ageing allows liquid smoke to settle and form a tar phase. After removing tar, the resultant liquid smoke is a clear liquid product that is “Generally Recognised as Safe” by the United States Food and Drug Administration [2]. Although ageing is an important process in the liquid smoke production, only a few studies in the public domain have investigated the impact of ageing on liquid smoke prop- erties. An early study investigated the chemical changes of liquid smoke during ageing for 4 months at ambient temper- ature [11]. Chemical analyses (GC–MS and FTIR) indicated a migration of aromatic hydrocarbons from liquid smoke to the formed tar. Another report used bamboo, oak and pine wood to prepare liquid smoke and aged for 35 months at room temperature [12]. Pyrolysis-Gas Chromatogra- phy–Mass Spectrometry (Py-GC–MS) analysis revealed * Saeid Baroutian s.baroutian@auckland.ac.nz 1 Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand 2 Faculty of Business and Economics, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1007/s00217-022-03976-2&domain=pdf 1312 European Food Research and Technology (2022) 248:1311–1319 1 3 the contents of phenolic components decreased with ageing time, and primarily was responsible for tar forming. Liquid smoke ageing is a simple process of storing in a tank; however, it largely prolongs production time by months [5]. Commercial demands may require a fast production turn around requiring a shortened ageing time. Accelerated age- ing of pyrolysis oil has been achieved in hours by a heating treatment at a temperature below 100 °C [8, 13]. Pyroly- sis oil is a similar product to liquid smoke by pyrolysis of woody biomass [14]. Therefore, accelerated ageing could be applicable to achieve a reduction of hours for liquid smoke ageing. This study used a fast pyrolysis method to prepare liquid smoke and investigated the effects of storage and accelerated ageing on the bioactive contents. It was hypothesised that bioactive contents would be decreased by ageing treatment due to the decrease of phenolics which primarily contrib- uted to bioactivity [15]. In addition, the changes of chemical composition were analysed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and interpreted by principal com- ponent analysis (PCA). This research serves as a practical reference to benefit liquid smoke manufacturing and food research communities. Materials and methods Materials Two types of woody biomass were used in this study. Kānuka woodchips were obtained from East Cape of New Zealand. Kānuka (Kunzea ericoides) is a native tea tree spe- cies and is commonly used for food smoking in New Zealand [16]. Hickory (Carya tomentosa) woodchips, as a popular smoke source, were purchased from Smokai Limited, New Zealand. Both woodchips had particle sizes with a range of 2–4 mm to meet the requirements of a fast pyrolysis process. The moisture of woodchips was in the range of 7–10 wt.% as they were stored in ambient conditions. Chemicals and reference standards were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, New Zealand, including gallic acid (purity, 97.5–102.5%), catechin hydrate (purity ≥ 96%), Folin–Cio- calteu’s phenol reagent, 1, 1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) (purity ≥ 95%), 6-hydroxy-2,-5,-7,-8-tetrameth- ylchroman-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox) (purity ≥ 98%), aluminium chloride (purity ≥ 99%), sodium carbonate (purity ≥ 99.9%), sodium nitrite (purity ≥ 99%) and dichlo- romethane (DCM) (purity ≥ 99%). Liquid smoke preparation and ageing Liquid smoke samples from kānuka and hickory woodchips were produced using a bubbling fluidised-bed fast pyrolysis reactor (1 kg/h), as shown in Fig. 1 [17]. The details and procedure of this fast pyrolysis method were provided in the Supplementary data [17, 18]. Briefly, kānuka or hickory woodchips were rapidly decomposed at a temperature of 450 °C and under a nitrogen atmosphere in the fluidised- bed reactor. Raw liquid smoke was collected by conden- sation after fast pyrolysis. It was centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 10 min to separate a thin oil phase and a liquid smoke phase. Fresh liquid smokes produced from kānuka wood were labelled as K-F, and the fresh samples from hickory wood were labelled as H-F as shown in Table 1. Long-time storage ageing was performed by storing fresh samples in airtight glass bottles (250 mL) with plas- tic caps at ambient temperature for 18 months. The bottles were storage in a covered container to avoid exposure to sunlight. Storage ageing is a common approach to improve the sensory properties of liquid smoke due to the changes in Fig. 1 A laboratory-scale fluidised-bed reactor for liquid smoke production [16] 1313European Food Research and Technology (2022) 248:1311–1319 1 3 flavour and chemical composition [11, 15]. These samples were labelled as K-SA and H-SA in Table 1. Accelerated ageing of liquid smoke was conducted by fol- lowing a previous study of pyrolysis oil ageing [19]. Firstly, clean airtight glass tubes (50 mL) with plastic caps were dried at 80 °C in a conventional oven overnight to remove any moisture. The tubes were weighed before and after transferring 45 mL of each sample to them. The tubes were placed in an oven at 80 °C and were sealed after 10 min. For each sample, 24 h and 48 h of treatments were applied. Afterwards, the samples were cooled to room temperature and stored at 4 °C before chemical analysis. Kānuka liq- uid smoke sample subjected to 24 h accelerated ageing was labelled as K-AA1, and the 48 h aged sample was labelled as K-AA2 in Table 1. Likewise, the hickory samples sub- jected to accelerated ageing at 24 h and 48 h were labelled as H-AA1 and H-AA2, respectively. Determination of bioactive contents All liquid smoke samples were analysed for total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), ferric reducing antioxidant power assay (FRAP) and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl- hydrazyl scavenging activity (DPPH). Firstly, liquid smoke samples were diluted in distilled water to a concentration of 10 mg/mL. Folin-Ciocalteu assay was used to determine TPC values with gallic acid standards [20]. An aluminium chloride method was used to determine TFC values with quercetin standards [21]. FRAP assays were conducted with trolox standards [22]. DPPH scavenging capacity was deter- mined with trolox standards [21]. The 96 well plates were incubated in the dark for 60 min at room temperature before the measurement with an ultra- violet–visible (UV) microplate reader (EnSpire 2300, Perki- nElmer). The absorbance values were measured at 765 nm for TPC, 510 nm for TFC, 593 nm for FRAP and 517 nm for DPPH. Bioactive capacities were expressed as milligram of standard equivalent per gram of liquid smoke: TPC—mg GAE/g, TFC—mg QE/g, FRAP—mg TE/g and DPPH—mg TE/g. The detailed procedures of these analysis methods were provided in the Supplementary data. Composition analysis Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS) analysis of liquid smoke samples was conducted to identify volatile compounds following a previous study with minor modifi- cation [23]. Liquid smoke samples were diluted in distilled water to a concentration of 250 mg/mL. The solutions were then mixed with dichloromethane at a volume ratio of 1:2 (solution: dichloromethane), and the mixtures were agitated at 200 rpm for 6 h. The dichloromethane extracts were fil- tered by 0.2 µm syringe filters before the analysis. The GC–MS instrument (Shimadzu QP-5000) was equipped with a DB-5HT column. Dichloromethane extract (1 μL) was injected at an injection temperature of 280 °C. The oven temperature was increased from 50 to 250 °C using a 20 °C/min heating rate, and was held at 250 °C for 5 min. Helium gas was used as the carrier with a flow rate of 3 mL/min. Mass spectra were operated in electron ionisa- tion mode at 70 eV, and the mass range was 50–300 amu for acquisition. Volatile compounds were identified by compar- ing the mass spectra with those in the library NIST and by comparing the data results with previous studies [18, 24, 25]. Their relative abundances were expressed as the peak area percentages of total ionisation chromatogram (TIC). These results were semi-quantitative since calibrating ion abundances to concentration was not practical considering many identified compounds (Table 2). Instead, peak area percentages of these compounds were used to illustrate the general trends of each compound but not to indicate their actual concentrations. Principal component analysis GC–MS results in this study were further analysed using principal component analysis (PCA) to classify liquid smoke samples. Principal component analysis can reduce the exper- imental data dimension by transforming a large set of inter- related variables into principal components. It makes the interpretation of complex data straightforward, such as the changes of liquid smoke chemical composition by various factors. Fresh liquid smokes and the aged samples with dif- ferent conditions were set as the observations. The peak area percentages of the compounds detected by GC–MS were set as the variations. The effects of ageing conditions on the chemical composition were examined. A MATLAB toolbox with MATLAB R2020a software was used to conduct PCA [26]. The toolbox gave visualising results including plots of scores and loadings. Table 1 Liquid smoke samples labelling and description Label Wood type Ageing method Ageing time K-Fresh Kanuka Freshly produced Non K-SA Kanuka Ambient storage 18 months K-AA1 Kanuka Accelerated ageing at 80 °C 24 h K-AA2 Kanuka Accelerated ageing at 80 °C 48 h H-Fresh Hickory Freshly produced Non H-SA Hickory Ambient storage 18 months H-AA1 Hickory Accelerated ageing at 80 °C 24 h H-AA2 Hickory Accelerated ageing at 80 °C 48 h 1314 European Food Research and Technology (2022) 248:1311–1319 1 3 Table 2 Identified volatile compounds by GC–MS analysis with the average percentages of relative peak area (Standard deviations of the aver- age percentages are presented in Table S1 in Supplementary data) Compound name Chemical group K-F K-SA K-AA1 K-AA2 H-F H-SA H-AA1 H-AA2 1-Phenylcyclohexanecarboxylic acid Acids1 1.4 2.1 2.3 2.3 1.4 2.0 1.9 1.8 Pentadecanoic acid Acids2 0.5 1.4 2.0 2.0 0.5 1.9 2.1 2.2 Octadecanoic acid Acids3 0.3 0.8 1.2 1.3 0.2 1.0 0.8 1.3 Butanal Carbonyls1 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.7 1.9 1.9 4-Methyl-5H-furan-2-one Carbonyls10 1.3 1.2 1.7 1.7 1.4 1.1 1.6 1.6 3-Tert-butylfuran-2,5-dione Carbonyls11 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.9 2-cyclopenten-1-one, 3-ethyl-2-hydroxy- Carbonyls12 1.1 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.5 1.3 1.3 2-Methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one Carbonyls2 2.3 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.7 2(5H)-Furanone Carbonyls3 5.7 6.7 6.1 6.0 6.1 5.4 6.1 6.0 5-Methyl-2(5H)-furanone Carbonyls4 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.3 3-Methyl-2-cyclopenten-1-one Carbonyls5 2.9 1.9 2.5 2.1 3.2 2.9 3.2 3.0 2(5H)-Furanone, 3-methyl- Carbonyls6 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.3 2-Furanone, 2,5-dihydro-3,5-dimethyl- Carbonyls7 0.9 0.6 1.5 1.5 0.8 1.3 1.3 1.4 1,2-Cyclopentanedione, 3-methyl- Carbonyls8 5.8 7.0 5.9 6.5 6.8 7.7 7.2 7.6 2-cyclopenten-1-one 2 3-dimethyl- Carbonyls9 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.8 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.1 butanoic acid, 3-hydroxy-, methyl Esters1 0.9 1.8 1.6 2.5 1.1 1.4 1.2 1.8 Sulphurous acid, isobutyl 2-methyl- Esters2 1.0 1.2 1.0 0.9 1.3 1.3 1.2 0.9 2-Hydroxyisocaproic acid, methyl ether, methyl ester Esters3 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.7 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 2,5-Dimethoxytetrahydrofuran Esters4 1.3 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1,2-Ethanediol, 1,2-di-2-furanyl- Furans1 1.0 0.9 1.2 1.2 0.8 1.5 1.2 1.0 Acetylfuran Furans2 0.9 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3 3,5-Dimethoxy-4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid Phenols1 1.8 1.8 0.9 1.5 1.3 1.9 0.8 1.0 Phenol, 2,3-dimethyl- Phenols10 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.1 2,3-Dihydroxybenzaldehyde Phenols11 0.7 0.8 1.1 0.6 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 Creosol Phenols12 6.8 5.8 4.5 3.9 5.0 3.7 3.9 3.4 Catechol Phenols13 4.0 4.5 4.8 5.0 3.5 4.2 4.4 4.4 1,3-Benzenediol, 2-methyl- Phenols14 3.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 3.7 2.0 1.8 1.6 Phenol, 4-ethyl-2-methoxy- Phenols15 3.9 4.9 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.1 3.6 3.6 Phenol, 2,6-dimethoxy- Phenols16 7.9 7.3 7.1 7.1 9.0 9.0 8.7 8.5 Phenol, 2-methoxy(2-propenyl)- Phenols17 1.3 1.4 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 4-Ethylthiophenol Phenols18 1.2 0.7 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 Vanillin Phenols19 2.1 2.3 3.0 2.9 2.0 1.6 2.3 2.1 3,5-Dimethoxy-4-hydroxycinnamic acid Phenols2 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.5 0.9 0.8 trans-Isoeugenol Phenols20 1.0 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.9 1.2 0.8 0.9 3,5-Dimethoxy-4-hydroxytoluene Phenols21 3.2 0.8 0.8 0.7 4.3 2.6 2.3 2.2 Apocynin Phenols22 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.5 1.2 1.5 1.7 2,4-Di-tert-butylphenol Phenols23 0.7 1.5 1.7 1.4 0.6 1.2 1.5 1.3 3,4,5-Trimethoxytoluene Phenols24 1.2 0.6 0.6 0.3 1.4 1.6 1.1 1.0 3,5-Dimethyl-4-hydroxybenzaldehyde Phenols25 2.4 1.7 3.0 3.0 2.4 1.8 2.6 2.5 4-Acetyl-2,6-dimethoxyphenyl acetate Phenols26 2.3 2.0 2.5 2.6 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.2 Benzenepropanol, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxy- Phenols3 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.1 1.1 0.8 0.9 Sinapyl alcohol Phenols4 0.8 1.4 1.6 1.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 Phenol Phenols5 1.4 0.7 1.4 1.3 2.1 1.3 2.1 2.1 Phenol, 3-methyl- Phenols6 2.0 1.9 2.1 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 Phenol, 3-methyl- Phenols7 1.9 1.0 1.7 1.6 2.5 1.8 2.4 2.3 Phenol, 2-methoxy- Phenols8 11.7 10.7 9.9 9.6 7.4 7.4 7.0 6.9 Maltol Phenols9 0.7 1.0 0.8 0.9 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.9 1315European Food Research and Technology (2022) 248:1311–1319 1 3 Statistical analysis All the analyses in this study were conducted in triplicate, and the results were presented as mean values ± standard deviation (n = 3). Analysis of variance was performed using SPSS 9.05 (Chicago, USA). The difference between means was analysed using Duncan’s test, and statistical significance was considered at p < 0.05. Results and discussion Liquid smoke ageing treatments Figure 2 shows the yields of kānuka and hickory liquid smokes after separating tar in storage and accelerated treat- ments. These ageing treatments all caused tar forming and led to mass loss of liquid smoke to different extents. It was observed that the changes in the yield of kānuka and hickory liquid smokes had the same trend under these age- ing treatments. The highest yield (97.8 wt.%) was obtained when the kānuka and hickory liquid smokes subjected to 18 months storage at ambient temperature (K-SA and H-SA). The kānuka and hickory liquid smokes thermally treated at 80 °C for 24 h had the second highest yield of 97.4 and 97.0 wt%, respectively. Thermal treatment at 80 °C for 48 h led to further yield decreases to 96.5 wt.% for kānuka liquid smoke and 95.9 wt.% for hickory liquid smoke. The high yields of liquid smoke indicated the mass loss in ageing treatments was minor. The reduction of liquid smoke yield indicated the increase of tar forming over the ageing period. The results in Fig. 2 revealed accelerated ageing was a severer ageing treatment than storage ageing because of more formed tar. A previous study on accelerated ageing of pyrolysis oil reported that an increase of thermal treatment temperature or time could cause the growth of tar formation due to the polymerisation of phenolics with aldehydes [13]. It was also reported that the stability of thermally treated samples could be essen- tially improved because active compounds are transformed to tar [27]. It was also noted in Fig. 2 that tar formtion was minor (2.2–4.1 wt.%) in all ageing treatments, although sta- tistical significance was found among them. Presumably, it may cause changes of bioactive contents due to the loss of phenolics to different extents in tar forming. Effects on bioactive contents and activities Figure 3 shows TPC values for fresh and aged liquid smoke samples. TPC is an important indicator of the antioxidant capacity, antimicrobial ability, and flavouring intensity of liquid smoke [28]. In addition, phenolic compounds are the most abundant functional groups in liquid smoke. Regard- ing kānuka liquid smokes, fresh sample presented the high- est value of 54.3 mg GAE/g. Storage ageing decreased the TPC value to 49.1 mg GAE/g, and accelerated ageing further reduced it to 44.2 mg GAE/g. The decrease in TPC value was also observed in the results of hickory liquid smokes. The TPC of hickory liquid smoke decreased from 62.8 mg GAE/g for the fresh sample to 42.5 mg GAE/g for ther- mally treated for 48 h. A previous study by a pyrolysis–gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis showed storage ageing for 35 months at ambient temperature led to approxi- mately 50% decrease of phenolics in liquid smoke [12]. Figure 3 also shows the TFC values of the fresh and aged liquid smoke samples. Flavonoids are another important group of compounds presented in liquid smoke contribut- ing to the antioxidant and antimicrobial activities [29]. The fresh liquid smoke showed the highest values of 60.2 mg QE/g for kānuka and 58.2 mg QE/g for hickory. The values were decreased after ageing treatments, while storage age- ing led to slightly more reduction than accelerated ageing. It implied that flavonoids were relatively stable under ther- mal treatment than phenolics, because phenolics had more chemically active sidechains, such as hydroxy. Figure 4 shows the antioxidant capacities of fresh and aged liquid smoke samples in terms of FRAP and DPPH. Ferric reducing power and free radical scavenging activity are significant indicators of the potential antioxidant capac- ity for liquid smoke [30]. A previous study showed that syringol, catechol and 3-methoxycatechol were the impor- tant contributors to the antioxidant capacity [31]. Fresh kānuka and hickory liquid smokes both presented the highest values of FRAP at around 73 mg TE/g. Storage and accel- erated ageing treatments all decreased the FRAP value to Fig. 2 Liquid smoke yields after different ageing treatments. Error bars correspond to standard deviations of the mean (n = 3). The columns with the same letters indicate no significance at p < 0.05. K-Fresh (freshly produced liquid smoke from Kanuka wood); K-SA (Kanuka liquid smoke ambient stored for 18  months); K-AA1 (Kanuka liquid smoke accelerated aged for 24  h); K-AA2 (Kanuka liquid smoke accelerated aged for 48  h); H-Fresh (freshly produced liquid smoke from Hickory wood); H-SA (Hickory liquid smoke ambient stored for 18 months); H-AA1 (Hickory liquid smoke accel- erated aged for 24 h); H-AA2 (Hickory liquid smoke accelerated aged for 48 h) 1316 European Food Research and Technology (2022) 248:1311–1319 1 3 the same extent in the range of 50.3–59.0 mg TE/g with no statistically significant difference. DPPH results confirmed the negative effect of ageing treatment on liquid smoke anti- oxidant activity. Effects on chemical composition GC–MS results of the fresh and aged liquid smoke sam- ples are presented in Table 2 with the relevant abundance of each identified compound. The standard deviations of the average percentages are presented in Table S1 in Sup- plementary data. These compounds are grouped into acids, furans, carbonyls, esters and phenols based on their chemical functionality. Phenols were the major compounds, as shown in Table 2. The most abundant phenol in all the samples were Phenols8 (phenol, 2-methoxy-), which is also known as guaiacol, and Phenols12 (creosol). The comparison of area percentages of Phenols8 and Phenols12 indicated storage Fig. 3 TPC (a) and TFC (b) val- ues of liquid smoke after ageing treatments. Error bars corre- spond to standard deviations of the mean (n = 3). The columns with the same letters indicate no significance at p < 0.05. K-Fresh (freshly produced liquid smoke from Kanuka wood); K-SA (Kanuka liquid smoke ambient stored for 18 months); K-AA1 (Kanuka liquid smoke acceler- ated aged for 24 h); K-AA2 (Kanuka liquid smoke acceler- ated aged for 48 h); H-Fresh (freshly produced liquid smoke from Hickory wood); H-SA (Hickory liquid smoke ambient stored for 18 months); H-AA1 (Hickory liquid smoke acceler- ated aged for 24 h); H-AA2 (Hickory liquid smoke acceler- ated aged for 48 h) Fig. 4 FRAP and DPPH values of liquid smoke after ageing treatments. Error bars corre- spond to standard deviations of the mean (n = 3). The columns with the same letters indicate no significance at p < 0.05. K-Fresh (freshly produced liquid smoke from Kanuka wood); K-SA (Kanuka liquid smoke ambient stored for 18 months); K-AA1 (Kanuka liquid smoke acceler- ated aged for 24 h); K-AA2 (Kanuka liquid smoke acceler- ated aged for 48 h); H-Fresh (freshly produced liquid smoke from Hickory wood); H-SA (Hickory liquid smoke ambient stored for 18 months); H-AA1 (Hickory liquid smoke acceler- ated aged for 24 h); H-AA2 (Hickory liquid smoke acceler- ated aged for 48 h) 1317European Food Research and Technology (2022) 248:1311–1319 1 3 ageing caused the loss and accelerated ageing led to a further reduction. This trend agreed with the results of liquid smoke bioactive content andantioxidant capacity. Carbonyls and furans are contributors to food colouring and texture changes, and they present synergistic effects on food aroma and flavour along with phenols [32]. As shown in Table 2, the important carbonyls were Carbonyls3 (2(5H)-Furanone), and Carbonyls8 (1,2-cyclopentanedione, 3-methyl-), and the furans shared relatively low peak per- centages. It was observed that the percentages of carbonyls and furans were slightly increased after ageing treatments or kept steady, suggesting carbonyls and furans were relatively stable during ageing. Acids and esters were also identified by GC–MS, as shown in Table 2. Although their peak percentages were low, their presence are essential to enrich liquid smoke sensory profile [32]. The results showed that peak percentages of the long-chain organic acids were increased by ageing treat- ments, while the percentages of esters were just fluctuated at very low values. It would be worthy to note that light molec- ular weight acids such as acetic acid were important com- pounds of liquid smoke [3]. They were not detected in this study because dichloromethane extraction before GC–MS analysis could not recover these polar compounds [33]. Principal component analysis Principal component analysis of liquid smoke chemical com- position from GC–MS results generated scores plot shown in Fig. 5 and loadings plot in Fig. 6. Principal component 1 (PC1) accounted for 38.61% of the variation among the age- ing treatment, and principal component 2 (PC2) accounted for 26.63%. The scores plot shows how the liquid smoke samples were different to each other by their relative loca- tions [34]. A long distance of the samples from each other means a large variation in their chemical compositions. The loadings plot shows the contributions of the functional com- pounds (Table 2) to the variation in the liquid smoke sam- ples [34]. A compound located away from the coordinate origin indicates the importance of its contribution to PC1 and PC2 with a positive or negative correlation defined by the scores plot. The two samples, K-AA1 and K-AA2, were clustered in the scores plot (Fig. 5), likewise samples H-AA1 and H-AA2. It revealed that accelerated ageing treatment for 24 h had a similar effect on liquid smoke chemical compo- sition as the ageing for 48 h. In other words, a heating time longer than 24 h did not have a significant influence, which is in agreement with the trends found from the results of bioactive contents and activities in Figs. 2 and 3. The rest of samples were scattered in the plot indicating the differ- ences in their chemical composition. Therefore, wood type and storage ageing were important factors for the resultant liquid smoke. The loadings plot in Fig. 6 showed PC1 was positively correlated to phenols located on the right side, including Phenols21 (3,5-dimethoxy-4-hydroxytoluene) and Phe- nols24 (3,4,5-trimethoxytoluene). The decrease of their peak percentages (Table 2) strongly contributed to the shift of liq- uid smoke samples to the left side on the scores plot (Fig. 5). Fig. 5 Scores plot of PC1 and PC2 for principal component analysis of liquid smoke volatile compounds. K-Fresh (freshly produced liq- uid smoke from Kanuka wood); K-SA (Kanuka liquid smoke ambi- ent stored for 18 months); K-AA1 (Kanuka liquid smoke accelerated aged for 24  h); K-AA2 (Kanuka liquid smoke accelerated aged for 48 h); H-Fresh (freshly produced liquid smoke from Hickory wood); H-SA (Hickory liquid smoke ambient stored for 18 months); H-AA1 (Hickory liquid smoke accelerated aged for 24 h); H-AA2 (Hickory liquid smoke accelerated aged for 48 h) Fig. 6 Loadings plot of PC1 and PC2 for principal component analy- sis of liquid smoke volatile compounds 1318 European Food Research and Technology (2022) 248:1311–1319 1 3 It explains that aged liquid smokes were always located on the left side of fresh samples. Table 2 also suggests that age- ing treatment leads to the loss of Phenols21 and Phenols24. Conclusion Ageing of fast pyrolysis liquid smoke was conducted by storage at ambient temperature for 18 months and thermal treatment at 80 °C for 24 h or 48 h. This study demonstrated that thermal treatment could be a novel approach to acceler- ate the liquid smoke ageing process. Storage ageing led to tar forming with a yield of approximately 2.2 wt.%, while thermal treatments slightly increased the tar yield up to 4.1 wt.%. Bioactive content (TPC and TFC values) of liquid smoke were decreased by all the ageing treatments, while it was found that flavonoids were possibly more stable than phenolics under thermal treatment. Thermal treatment did not cause a further significant decrease of the antioxidant capacities in terms of FRAP and DPPH that storage age- ing. GC–MS analysis revealed that the loss of guaiacol and creosol during ageing were primarily responsible for the decreases of liquid smoke bioactive content and activities. PCA revealed thermal treatment for 24 h was sufficient to age liquid smoke. The liquid smoke chemical composition was strongly influenced by wood type and ageing conditions. Further study should investigate the effects of liquid smoke ageing on the antimicrobial activity and sensory profile. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplemen- tary material available at https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00217- 022- 03976-2. Acknowledgements The authors acknowledge the University of Auck- land FRDF Grant 3719621. Funding Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions. Declarations Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no known com- peting financial interests or personal relationships that could have ap- peared to influence the work reported in this paper. Compliance with ethics requirements This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attri- bution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adapta- tion, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creat iveco mmons. org/ licen ses/ by/4. 0/. References 1. Surboyo MDC, Arundina I, Rahayu RP et al (2019) Potential of distilled liquid smoke derived from coconut (Cocos nucifera L) shell for traumatic ulcer healing in diabetic rats. Eur J Dent 13:271–279. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1055/s- 0039- 16935 27 2. Šimko P (2005) Factors affecting elimination of polycyclic aro- matic hydrocarbons from smoked meat foods and liquid smoke flavorings. Mol Nutr Food Res 49:637–647. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ mnfr. 20040 0091 3. Montazeri N, Crapo CA, Oliveira ACM et al (2012) Chemical characterization of commercial liquid smoke products. Food Sci Nutr 1:102–115. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ fsn3.9 4. Xin X, Dell K, Udugama IA et al (2020) Transforming biomass pyrolysis technologies to produce liquid smoke food flavouring. J Clean Prod. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jclep ro. 2020. 125368 5. Lingbeck JM, Cordero P, O’Bryan CA et al (2014) Functionality of liquid smoke as an all-natural antimicrobial in food preser- vation. Meat Sci 97:197–206. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. meats ci. 2014. 02. 003 6. Gul O, Dervisoglu M, Mortas M et al (2015) Evaluation of poly- cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Circassian cheese by high-per- formance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. J Food Compos Anal 37:82–86. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jfca. 2014. 07. 004 7. Grand View Research (2019) Liquid Smoke Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Application (Meat Products, Sauces, Dairy Products, Pet Food), By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2019-2025. https:// www. grand viewr esear ch. com/ indus try- analy sis/ liquid- smoke- marke t#: ~: text= Indus try Insights, to remain a favorable factor. Accessed 1 Sep 2020 8. Alsbou E, Helleur B (2014) Accelerated aging of bio-oil from fast pyrolysis of hardwood. Energy Fuels 28:3224–3235. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ ef500 399n 9. Oasmaa A, Fonts I, Pelaez-Samaniego MR et al (2016) Pyroly- sis oil multiphase behavior and phase stability: a review. Energy Fuels 30:6179–6200. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ acs. energ yfuels. 6b012 87 10. Simon R, de la Calle B, Palme S et al (2005) Composition and analysis of liquid smoke flavouring primary products. J Sep Sci 28:871–882. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ jssc. 20050 0009 11. Guillen MD, Manzanos MJ (1996) Some changes in an aqueous liquid smoke flavouring during storage in polythene receptacles. Zeitschrift für Leb und Forsch 202:24–29 12. Mun SP, Ku CS (2010) Pyrolysis GC-MS analysis of tars formed during the aging of wood and bamboo crude vinegars. J Wood Sci 56:47–52. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10086- 009- 1054-0 13. Meng J, Moore A, Tilotta D et al (2014) Toward understanding of bio-oil aging: accelerated aging of bio-oil fractions. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2:2011–2018. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ sc500 223e 14. Balat M (2011) An overview of the properties and applications of biomass pyrolysis oils. Energy Sources Part A Recover Util Envi- ron Eff 33:674–689. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 15567 03090 32289 14 15. Maga JA (2018) Smoke in food processing, 1st edn. CRC Press 16. Essien SO, Baroutian S, Dell K, Young B (2019) Value-added potential of New Zealand mānuka and kānuka products: A review. Ind Crops Prod 130:198–207. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. indcr op. 2018. 12. 083 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-022-03976-2 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1693527 https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.200400091 https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.200400091 https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125368 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.02.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.02.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2014.07.004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2014.07.004 https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/liquid-smoke-market#:~:text=Industry https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/liquid-smoke-market#:~:text=Industry https://doi.org/10.1021/ef500399n https://doi.org/10.1021/ef500399n https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01287 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01287 https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200500009 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-009-1054-0 https://doi.org/10.1021/sc500223e https://doi.org/10.1080/15567030903228914 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.12.083 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.12.083 1319European Food Research and Technology (2022) 248:1311–1319 1 3 17. Xin X, Ghoreishi K, An G et al (2021) The effect of liquid smoke obtained from fast pyrolysis of a hardwood on physical properties and shelf life of cheddar cheese. Eur Food Res Technol. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00217- 021- 03915-7 18. Xin X, Bissett A, Wang J et al (2021) Production of liquid smoke using fluidised-bed fast pyrolysis and its application to green lipped mussel meat. Food Control 124:107874. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. foodc ont. 2021. 107874 19. Elliott DC, Oasmaa A, Meier D et al (2012) Results of the IEA round robin on viscosity and aging of fast pyrolysis bio-oils: long- term tests and repeatability. Energy Fuels 26:7362–7366. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ ef301 607v 20. Munir MT, Kheirkhah H, Baroutian S et al (2018) Subcritical water extraction of bioactive compounds from waste onion skin. J Clean Prod 183:487–494 21. Essien S, Young B, Baroutian S (2020) Subcritical water extrac- tion for selective recovery of phenolic bioactives from kānuka leaves. J Supercrit Fluids 158:104721 22. Kheirkhah H, Baroutian S, Quek SY (2019) Evaluation of bio- active compounds extracted from Hayward kiwifruit pomace by subcritical water extraction. Food Bioprod Process 115:143–153 23. Guillén MD, Ibargoitia ML (1998) New components with poten- tial antioxidant and organoleptic properties, detected for the first time in liquid smoke flavoring preparations. J Agric Food Chem 46:1276–1285. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ jf970 952x 24. Taruna Syah I, Darmadji P, Pranoto Y (2016) Microencapsulation of refined liquid smoke using maltodextrin produced from broken rice starch. J Food Process Preserv 40:437–446. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ jfpp. 12621 25. Petzold G, Gianelli MP, Bugueño G et al (2014) Encapsulation of liquid smoke flavoring in ca-alginate and ca-alginate-chitosan beads. J Food Sci Technol 51:183–190. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s13197- 013- 1090-z 26. Ballabio D (2015) A MATLAB toolbox for Principal Component Analysis and unsupervised exploration of data structure. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 149:1–9. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. chemo lab. 2015. 10. 003 27. Hilten RN, Das KC (2010) Comparison of three accelerated aging procedures to assess bio-oil stability. Fuel 89:2741–2749. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. fuel. 2010. 03. 033 28. Singleton VL, Orthofer R, Lamuela-Raventós RM (1999) [14] Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and anti- oxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent. In: Abelson JN, Simon MI (eds) Methods in enzymology, vol 299. Academic Press, pp 152–178. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ S0076- 6879(99) 99017-1 29. Tarawan VM, Mantilidewi KI, Dhini IM et al (2017) Coconut shell liquid smoke promotes burn wound healing. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med 22:436–440 30. Liu X, Sun H, Gao P et al (2018) Antioxidant properties of com- pounds isolated from wood vinegar by activity-guided and pH- gradient extraction. J Wood Chem Technol 38:313–323. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 02773 813. 2018. 14888 73 31. Loo AY, Jain K, Darah I (2008) Antioxidant activity of com- pounds isolated from the pyroligneous acid, Rhizophora apiculata. Food Chem 107:1151–1160 32. Maga JA (1987) The flavor chemistry of wood smoke. Food Rev Int 9129:139–183. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 87559 12870 95408 10 33. Guillen MD, Sopelana P, Partearroyo MA (2000) Polycyclic aro- matic hydrocarbons in liquid smoke flavorings obtained from dif- ferent types of wood. Effect of storage in polyethylene flasks on their concentrations. J Agric Food Chem 48:5083–5087. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1021/ jf000 371z 34. Xin X, Pang S, de Miguel MF, Torr KM (2019) The effect of bio- mass pretreatment on catalytic pyrolysis products of pine wood by Py-GC/MS and principal component analysis. J Anal Appl Pyrol 138:145–153. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jaap. 2018. 12. 018 Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-021-03915-7 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-021-03915-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.107874 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.107874 https://doi.org/10.1021/ef301607v https://doi.org/10.1021/ef301607v https://doi.org/10.1021/jf970952x https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.12621 https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.12621 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-013-1090-z https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-013-1090-z https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.10.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.10.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2010.03.033 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2010.03.033 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(99)99017-1 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(99)99017-1 https://doi.org/10.1080/02773813.2018.1488873 https://doi.org/10.1080/02773813.2018.1488873 https://doi.org/10.1080/87559128709540810 https://doi.org/10.1021/jf000371z https://doi.org/10.1021/jf000371z https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2018.12.018 The effects of ageing treatment on bioactive contents and chemical composition of liquid smoke food flavourings Abstract Introduction Materials and methods Materials Liquid smoke preparation and ageing Determination of bioactive contents Composition analysis Principal component analysis Statistical analysis Results and discussion Liquid smoke ageing treatments Effects on bioactive contents and activities Effects on chemical composition Principal component analysis Conclusion Acknowledgements References