Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. tJ...b -- &t?Cl EFFECT OF WALKING EXTRA DISTANCES ON THE PERFORMANCE OF GRAZING DAIRY COWS IN EARLY LACTATION A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Agricultural Science Department of Animal Science, Massey University Palmerston North, New Zealand SUMATE PRATUMSUWAN 1994 ii ABSTRACT Two groups, each of 1 3 Friesian cows in early lactation, were fed and managed identically throughout the experimental period of 4 weeks ( 1 3th September- lOth October, 1 993), except that the control group (CT) walked directly from the paddock to the milking shed and back to the paddock (average 1 .5 km per day), whereas the walk group (WK.) walked approximately 6 km more per day than the control group (total 7.5 km per day). During walking, all cows were moved at the average walking speed of 55 m/min. The aim of the study was to examine the effects of walking extra distances on the performance of grazing dairy cows in early lactation. A common daily herbage allowance (30-40 kgDM/cow/day) was given to both groups grazed in the same paddock, on equal areas separated by an electric fence. Milk production and composition, somatic cell counts, liveweight and condition score, reproductive performance and grazing behaviour were measured and analysed. Herbage intake was estimated directly using a rising plate pasture meter and indirectly using chromic oxide technique (slow release chromium capsules; CAPTEC NZ., Ltd). The average dry matter intakes, as assessed by the pasture meter, were similar for the er and the WK group being 1 6. 1 and 1 6.5 kgDM/cow/day, respectively. Average daily yields of milk and milk solids for both groups were 25 litres/cow and 1 .9 kg/cow, respectively. There were no significant differences in milk yields, milk composition, somatic cell counts (SCC), or changes in liveweight and condition score iii between the two groups. However, the WK. group did produce slightly less milk solids (by 2 to 3%), and had slightly higher SCC than the er group. No adverse effects on reproductive performance of cows in the WK group were observed. Although the WK group spent less time on the pasture by about 1 .5 hour per day, there was no significant difference in time spent grazing (GT) between both groups. Nevertheless, the WK. group spent significantly less time standing (P CHAPTER 4 RESULTS 32 4. 1 CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF THE HERBAGE 32 4.2 HERBAGE INTAKE 33 4.3 ANIMAL PERFORMANCE 34 4.3. 1 Yields of Milk, Milk fat, Milk Protein and Lactose 35 4.3.2 Milk Composition 37 4.3 .3 Somatic Cell Counts 38 4.3.4 Liveweight and Body Condition Score '5.) 4.3 . 5 Reproductive Performance 4.4 GRAZING BEHAVIOUR CHAPTER 5 DISCUSSION 5. 1 EFFECT OF WALKING ON HERBAGE INTAKE 5. 1 . 1 Herbage Mass and Herbage Allowance 5. 1 .2 Herbage Intake 5.2 EFFECT OF WALKING ON ANIMAL PERFORMANCE 5.2 . 1 Milk Production and Composition 5.2.2 Liveweight and Body Condition Score 5.2.3 Calculation for Energy Balance 5.2.4 Reproductive Performance 5.3 EFFECT OF WALKING ON SOMA TIC CELL COUNTS 5.4 GRAZING BEHAVIOUR 5. 5 ANIMAL HEALTH CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSION BffiLIOGRAPHY vii .:U 41 42 42 42 43 tfl tfl 52 53 55 56 57 57 61 LIST OF TABLES Table 2. 1 Published values for energy expenditure for walking in cattle Table 3 . 1 Climatological data during the experimental period Table 3.2 Data for the cows at the start of the experiment Table 4.1 Data for chemical analyses of the herbage viii 3 21 23 32 Table 4.2 Mean values for herbage measurements, allowance and apparent intake (measured by the pasture meter) 33 Table 4.3 Mean values for daily yields of milk, milk fat, milk protein and lactose 36 Table 4.4 Mean values for the concentration of milk fat, milk protein and lactose 37 Table 4.5 Mean values for somatic cell counts 38 Table 4.6 Mean values for the final liveweight, final condition score, liveweight change and condition score change '5:) Table 4.7 Data for some characteristics of reproductive performance 4) Table 4.8 Mean values for time spent in various activities of grazing behaviour 41 Table 5. 1 Calculated energy balance for the two treatment groups 54