Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. PreAdolescent CardioMetabolic Associations and Correlates: PACMAC A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in School of Sport and Exercise at Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand Nicholas Castro 2018 ii Abstract Cardiovascular disease is typically associated with adults; however, atherosclerosis often initiates during preadolescence and has been linked to cardiometabolic risk factors. Preceding cardiometabolic risk factors include lifestyle factors: body fatness, physical fitness, physical [in]activity, sedentary behaviour, nutrition, and sleep. No known study has comprehensively assessed simultaneous associations among lifestyle factors with cardiometabolic risk factors in preadolescent children. A multicentred cross-sectional study design was utilised to investigate lifestyle factor associations with cardiometabolic risk factors in a sample of 392 children aged 8 to 10 years. Participants were recruited from primary schools located in the Wellington, Canterbury, and Otago regions in New Zealand. Data collection was carried out over 5 days between 09:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. at each location. The first objective assessed the associations among physical fitness, physical [in]activity, sedentary behaviour, nutrition, and sleep with body fatness indicators (body fat percentage, fat mass index, body mass index, and waist-to-hip ratio). Results indicated nutrition independently associated with body fat percentage (p < 0.05), whereas cardiorespiratory fitness significantly associated with all four body fatness indicators (p < 0.05). The second objective assessed the associations among body fatness, physical fitness, physical [in]activity, sedentary behaviour, nutrition, and sleep with cardiometabolic factors (blood pressure, cholesterol, vascular, and carbohydrate- metabolic). Results indicated body fat percentage associated with the blood pressure factor (p < 0.05); sedentary minutes, social jetlag, and Fruit and Vegetables pattern associated with the cholesterol factor (all p < 0.05); sedentary minutes and Processed iii Food pattern associated with the vascular factor (both p < 0.05); and cardiovascular fitness (V̇O₂max) and handgrip strength associated with the carbohydrate-metabolic factor (both p < 0.001). Accordingly, body fatness, physical fitness, nutrition, and sleep all associated with at least one cardiometabolic factor. Cardiorespiratory fitness associated with cardiometabolic health and was the key finding in Objective 1; therefore, physical fitness may be the most important lifestyle factor. However, as nutrition, sleep, sedentary behaviour, and body fatness also associated with cardiometabolic health, it appears one specific lifestyle factor does not entirely explain cardiometabolic health in preadolescent children, and thus a multimodal approach for health is required for this population. iv Preface The foundation for this research originated from my passion for working with children in afterschool programs and wanting to make a difference in their health and wellbeing. The PreAdolescent CardioMetabolic Associations and Correlates (PACMAC) study design came about due to the decline of children’s overall health in New Zealand and worldwide, indicating the need to examine the importance of lifestyle factors with cardiometabolic health. I believe improving the overall health and wellbeing of children will require a multifaceted approach; the PACMAC study represents the preliminary phase. Conceptualization Based on my experience working with children in various settings (academic, athletic, and social), along with researching outcomes from previous paediatric studies, it became clear which influential lifestyle factors should be included. In discussion with my supervisory team, we formatted a list of research questions and together determined a study design detailing the most productive, safe, reliable, and noninvasive way to collect data in a school setting. Based on the preferred study design, preadolescent children aged 8 to 10 years seemed to represent the most likely target age for reliable data, yet would be young enough (prepubertal) to minimise sex differences. Ethics One of my first PhD responsibilities was to attain ethical approval. I submitted my ethics application to the Massey University Human Ethics Committee. During the risk assessment process, the PACMAC study was categorised as high risk and invasive given that the methods included a standard finger prick procedure to collect biochemical markers and that the study population was preadolescent children. Therefore, I was required to seek approval from the New Zealand Health and Disability Ethics v Committee (HDEC). I received approval from the HDEC on June 26, 2014 (HDEC:14/CEN/83). Data Collection For the data collection process, I recruited each principal, teacher, participant, and parent or guardian that participated in this study. Additionally, I designed and formatted standard operating procedure guidelines for each study measurement, set up the data collection stations, and recruited and trained research assistants at each location. Furthermore, during the week of data collection in the schools I led activities that focused on the importance of being active, eating healthy, and getting the proper amount of sleep. School staff were very appreciative of all the health information I provided to the participants and their families in return for participating in the study. Data Analysis and Management Regarding the analysis and interpretation, each day I calculated and verified each participant’s measurement means (height, weight, waist circumference, hip circumference, blood pressure, augmentation index pressure, and pulse rate), and then transferred the calculated data from the data collection forms to an Excel spreadsheet. Next, I formatted and entered all the data into the SPSS program. For statistical analysis and interpretation, I was assisted by my supervisors, a mentor (Dr. Paula Skidmore), and a certified statistician. Writing The writing of this thesis is my work. I received extensive feedback from my supervisors while writing the literature review through multiple editing processes. The statistical analysis, results, and discussion sections I wrote after robust discussion of the results with my supervisors. vi Publications The PACMAC study protocol has been already published and the following papers based on my research have been published or are in progress. My contribution to each paper is itemised in Table 1. Table 1 Contributions to Publications Publications Conceptual- ization Study Design Recruit- ment Data Collection Data Analysis Writing Paper 1 X N/A N/A N/A N/A X Paper 2 X X X X X X Paper 3 X X X Paper 4 X X X Paper 5 X X X 1. Castro, N., Lambrick, D. M., Faulkner, J., Lark, S., Williams, M. A., & Stoner, L. (2013). Decreasing the cardiovascular disease burden in Māori children: The interface of pathophysiology and cultural awareness. Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis, 20, 833-834. doi:10.5551/jat.20198 2. Castro, N., Faulkner, J., Skidmore, P., Williams, M., Lambrick, D. M., Signal, L., . . . Stoner, L. (2014). Pre-adolescent cardio-metabolic associations and correlates: PACMAC methodology and study protocol. BMJ Open, 4(e005815), 1-9. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005815 3. Stoner, L., Castro, N., Signal, L., Skidmore, P., Faulkner, J., Lark, S., … Harrex, H. (2018). Sleep and adiposity in preadolescent children: The importance of social jetlag. Childhood Obesity, 14, 158-164. doi:10.1089/chi.2017.0272 vii 4. Stoner, L., Weatherall, M., Skidmore, P., Castro, N., Lark, S., Faulkner, J., & Williams, M. A. (2017). Cardiometabolic risk variables in preadolescent children: A factor analysis. Journal of the American Heart Association, 6(e007071). doi:10.1161/JAHA.117.007071 5. Stoner, L., Castro, N., Skidmore, P., Lark, S., Faulkner, J., & Williams, M. A. (2018). Fitness and fatness are both associated with cardiometabolic health in 8-10- year-old New Zealand children. Manuscript in preparation. viii Acknowledgements This thesis would not have been possible without the support of many individuals and organizations, which cannot be done justice with a few words, however, I will endeavour to do so. My entire PhD was funded by Education New Zealand and Massey University, and this study would not have been possible without their support. Thank you to the staff and participants at the primary schools that participated in my study: Scots College, St. Patrick’s, Crofton Downs, St. Bernadette’s, Green Island, Holy Cross, Springston, Rāwhiti, and Yaldhurst. I really enjoyed data collection. Dr. Lee Stoner, from the first day I arrived in New Zealand you were there supporting and mentoring me, which has been essential to my growth and development during my PhD journey. So much appreciated, Lee. Dr. Sally Lark and Dr. James Faulkner, thanks for all the time you devoted to the PACMAC study. Sally, for keeping the team down-to-earth when things got hectic. James, for the time you took to counsel me and for the constructive criticism. Dr. Michael Hamlin, thanks for the V̇O₂max knowledge and for the support you and your family provided when I was collecting data in the Canterbury region. Dr. Paula Skidmore, thanks for mentoring me, for the support you provided when I was collecting data in the Otago region, and for all the principal component analysis work you did for the PACMAC study. To all my family and loved ones, I say thank you with all my heart for always believing in me and supporting this small-town boy from Blythe, California. To my partner Inge, thanks for always being encouraging and my biggest supporter. I could not have completed this PhD without your unconditional love. Ethical approval for this study was received from the regional HDEC (14/CEN/83). ix List of Publications Castro, N., Faulkner, J., Skidmore, P., Williams, M., Lambrick, D. M., Signal, L., . . . Stoner, L. (2014). Pre-adolescent cardio-metabolic associations and correlates: PACMAC methodology and study protocol. BMJ Open, 4(e005815), 1-9. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005815 Castro, N., Lambrick, D. M., Faulkner, J., Lark, S., Williams, M. A., & Stoner, L. (2013). Decreasing the cardiovascular disease burden in Māori children: The interface of pathophysiology and cultural awareness. Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis, 20, 833-834. doi:10.5551/jat.20198 Stoner, L., Castro, N., Signal, L., Skidmore, P., Faulkner, J., Lark, S., Williams, M. A., Muller, D., & Harrex, H. (2018). Sleep and adiposity in preadolescent children: The importance of social jetlag. Childhood Obesity, 14, 158-164. doi:10.1089/chi.2017.0272 Stoner, L., Weatherall, M., Skidmore, P., Castro, N., Lark, S., Faulkner, J., & Williams, M. A. (2017). Cardiometabolic risk variables in preadolescent children: A factor analysis. Journal of the American Heart Association, 6(e007071), 1-10. doi:10.1161/JAHA.117007071 Manuscript in Preparation Stoner, L., Castro, N., Skidmore, P., Lark, S., Faulkner, J., & Williams, M. A. (2018). Fitness and fatness are both associated with cardiometabolic health in 8-10-year- old New Zealand children. x Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................. ii Preface .............................................................................................................................. iv Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................ viii List of Publications .......................................................................................................... ix List of Tables .................................................................................................................. xv List of Figures ................................................................................................................ xvi List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................... xvii Definition of Terms ........................................................................................................ xix CHAPTER 1—INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 1 1.0 Circumstances and Statement of the Problem ............................................ 1 1.1 Objectives of Research................................................................................ 2 1.2 Outline of Thesis ......................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER 2—LITERATURE REVIEW ........................................................................ 4 2.0 Cardiometabolic Health .............................................................................. 4 2.0.1 Background .......................................................................................... 4 2.0.2 Evaluating Cardiometabolic Health ..................................................... 9 Applied cardiometabolic health assessments .......................................... 15 2.1 Body Fatness ............................................................................................. 15 2.1.1 Background ........................................................................................ 15 2.1.2 Evaluating Body Fatness .................................................................... 21 Applied body fatness assessments .......................................................... 24 2.2 Physical Fitness ......................................................................................... 25 2.2.1 Background ........................................................................................ 25 2.2.2 Evaluating Physical Fitness ............................................................... 29 Applied physical fitness assessments ...................................................... 32 2.3 Physical [In]activity and Sedentary Behaviour ......................................... 32 2.3.1 Background ........................................................................................ 32 Physical [in]activity physiological pathways to CVD ............................ 33 Sedentary behaviour physiological pathways to CVD ........................... 35 2.3.2 Evaluating Physical [In]activity and Sedentary Behaviour ............... 37 Objective measures ................................................................................. 38 xi Subjective measures ................................................................................ 41 Applied physical [in]activity and sedentary behaviour assessment ........ 43 2.4 Nutrition .................................................................................................... 43 2.4.1 Background ........................................................................................ 43 Carbohydrate ........................................................................................... 44 Protein ..................................................................................................... 50 Lipids ...................................................................................................... 52 Fruits and vegetables ............................................................................... 53 2.4.2 Evaluating Nutrition ........................................................................... 55 Applied nutritional assessment ............................................................... 56 2.5 Sleep .......................................................................................................... 56 2.5.1 Background ........................................................................................ 56 2.5.2 Evaluating Sleep ................................................................................ 58 Objective measures. ................................................................................ 58 Self-report measures. .............................................................................. 60 Applied sleep assessment. ....................................................................... 61 2.6 Summary ................................................................................................... 61 2.6.1 Applied Measures Analysis ............................................................... 62 CHAPTER 3—METHODOLOGY ................................................................................ 64 Pre-Adolescent Cardiometabolic Associations and Correlates: PACMAC Methodology and Study Protocol ................................................. 64 3.0 PACMAC Study Protocol ......................................................................... 64 3.0.1 Research Study Objectives................................................................. 66 3.1 Methodology ............................................................................................. 66 3.1.1 Study Design ...................................................................................... 66 3.1.2 Study Participants and Recruitment ................................................... 67 3.1.3 Cultural Sensitivity ............................................................................ 67 3.2 Data Collection and Analysis .................................................................... 68 3.2.1 Demographics .................................................................................... 68 3.2.2 Cardiometabolic Health ..................................................................... 69 3.2.3 Adiposity and Anthropometrics ......................................................... 69 3.2.4 Physical Fitness .................................................................................. 69 3.2.5 Physical Activity ................................................................................ 70 3.2.6 Nutrition ............................................................................................. 70 xii 3.2.7 Sleep ................................................................................................... 70 3.3 Quality Control ......................................................................................... 71 3.3.1 Development of Protocols .................................................................. 71 3.3.2 Training of Research Assistants ......................................................... 71 3.3.3 Data Collection .................................................................................. 73 3.3.4 Data Cleaning ..................................................................................... 73 3.4 Sample Size Calculations .......................................................................... 73 3.5 Statistical Analysis .................................................................................... 74 3.5.1 Principal Component Analysis .......................................................... 74 Food frequency questionnaire principal components analysis ............... 75 Cardiometabolic principal components analysis..................................... 78 3.5.2 Univariate Analysis ............................................................................ 80 3.5.3 Multivariate Analysis ......................................................................... 80 3.6 Dissemination of Findings ........................................................................ 81 3.7 Discussion ................................................................................................. 82 CHAPTER 4—RESEARCH OBJECTIVE 1 ................................................................. 83 Associations With Adiposity in Preadolescent Children: Fitness, Physical [In]activity, Sedentary Behaviour, Nutrition, and Sleep .................. 83 4.0 Background ............................................................................................... 83 4.1 Methodology ............................................................................................. 84 4.1.1 Recruitment and Participants ............................................................. 85 4.1.2 Study Design ...................................................................................... 85 4.2 Data Collection and Analysis .................................................................... 88 4.2.1 Demographics .................................................................................... 88 4.2.2 Adiposity and Anthropometrics ......................................................... 88 4.2.3 Physical Fitness .................................................................................. 89 4.2.4 Physical [In]activity and Sedentary Behaviour .................................. 91 4.2.5 Nutrition ............................................................................................. 92 4.2.6 Sleep ................................................................................................... 93 4.3 Statistical Analysis .................................................................................... 94 4.4 Results ....................................................................................................... 95 4.4.1 Univariate Models .............................................................................. 95 4.4.2 Multivariate Models ........................................................................... 95 4.5 Discussion ................................................................................................. 98 xiii 4.5.1 Comparison With Other Studies ........................................................ 99 4.5.2 Limitations and Strengths of This Study ......................................... 102 4.5.3 Research Implications ...................................................................... 103 4.6 Conclusion .............................................................................................. 104 CHAPTER 5—RESEARCH OBJECTIVE 2 ............................................................... 105 Associations with Cardiometabolic Health in Preadolescent Children: Fatness, Fitness, Physical [In]activity, Sedentary Behaviour, Nutrition, and Sleep ....................................................................................................... 105 5.0 Background ............................................................................................. 105 5.1 Methodology ........................................................................................... 106 5.1.1 Recruitment and Participants ........................................................... 106 5.1.2 Study Design .................................................................................... 108 5.2 Data Collection and Analysis .................................................................. 109 5.2.1 Demographics .................................................................................. 109 5.2.2 Cardiometabolic Health .................................................................. 110 5.2.3 Adiposity and Anthropometrics ...................................................... 111 5.2.4 Physical Fitness ............................................................................... 113 5.2.5 Physical [In]activity and Sedentary Behaviour ................................ 114 5.2.6 Nutrition ........................................................................................... 115 5.2.7 Sleep ................................................................................................ 116 5.3 Statistical Analysis .................................................................................. 117 5.4 Results ..................................................................................................... 118 5.4.1 Cardiometabolic Factor Correlations and Analysis ......................... 118 5.4.2 Univariate Models ............................................................................ 119 5.4.3 Multivariate Models ......................................................................... 119 5.5 Discussion ............................................................................................... 124 5.5.1 Comparison With Other Studies ...................................................... 124 5.5.2 Limitations and Strengths of This Study ......................................... 127 5.5.3 Research Implications ...................................................................... 128 5.6 Conclusion .............................................................................................. 129 CHAPTER 6—GENERAL DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS ........................... 130 6.0 Summary of Findings .............................................................................. 130 6.0.1 Objective 1 ....................................................................................... 130 6.0.2 Objective 2 ....................................................................................... 134 xiv 6.0.3 Implications ...................................................................................... 138 6.0.4 Future Directions, Limitations, and Strengths ................................. 139 6.1 Conclusion .............................................................................................. 140 References ..................................................................................................................... 141 Appendices Appendix A. PACMAC Questionnaire ........................................................ 195 Appendix B. Standard Operating Protocols ................................................. 220 Appendix C. Study Invitation Letter ........................................................... 229 Appendix D. Participant Paperwork ............................................................. 230 Appendix E. Factor Loadings of Food Items Grouped into Three Identified Dietary Patterns in New Zealand Children ........................... 235 xv List of Tables Table 1. Contributions to Publications ............................................................................ vi Table 2. Sources and Functions of Key Adipokines ........................................................ 18 Table 3. Physiological Benefits of Physical Fitness ....................................................... 27 Table 4. Function of Micronutrients ............................................................................... 47 Table 5. Standard Operating Protocol Foundations ...................................................... 72 Table 6. Cardiometabolic Patterns ................................................................................. 79 Table 7. Participant Data Description: Categorical Variables ........................................ 87 Table 8. Participant Data Description: Continuous Variables ........................................ 91 Table 9. Linear Association Between Body Fatness and Lifestyle Factors .................... 96 Table 10. Participant Data Description: Categorical Variables .................................... 108 Table 11. Participant Data Description: Continuous Variables .................................... 111 Table 12. Linear Association Between Cardiometabolic Health and Lifestyle Behaviours ........................................................................................................ 121 Table 13. Cardiometabolic Patterns ............................................................................. 123 xvi List of Figures Figure 1. Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). ................................................................ 5 Figure 2. The progression of atherosclerosis.. .................................................................. 6 Figure 3. The progression of cardiovascular disease (CVD). ........................................... 9 Figure 4. The role of inflammation and lipotoxicity on obesity ..................................... 16 Figure 5. Body fatness assessments. ............................................................................... 21 Figure 6. Dietary intake .................................................................................................. 46 Figure 7. PACMAC measuring methods. ....................................................................... 63 Figure 8. Study protocol. ................................................................................................ 66 Figure 9. Component plots with factor diagrams from principal component analysis (PCA) with varimax orthogonal rotation. ........................................................... 76 Figure 10. Scree plot of eigenvalues of the 21 food groups from the principal component analysis (PCA). ................................................................................ 77 Figure 11. Participant recruitment. ................................................................................. 86 Figure 12. Scree plot of eigenvalues of the 21 food groups from the principal component analysis (PCA). ................................................................................ 93 Figure 13. V̇O₂max and body fat percent linear quadratic and cubic analysis. ................. 98 Figure 14. Participant recruitment. ............................................................................... 107 Figure 15. Scree plot of eigenvalues of the 21 food groups from principal component analysis (PCA). ................................................................................................. 116 Figure 16. Component plots with factor diagrams from principal component analysis (PCA) with varimax orthogonal rotation. ......................................................... 120 xvii List of Abbreviations AIx = Augmentation Index Pressure BIA = Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis BMI = Body Mass Index CVD = Cardiovascular Disease CDC = Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CBP = Central Blood Pressure CSHQ = Child Sleep Habits Questionnaire DBP = Diastolic Blood Pressure FMI = Fat Mass Index FMD = Flow-Mediated Dilation HbA1c = Glycosylated Haemoglobin HR = Heart Rate HRM = Heart Rate Monitors HDL-C = High Density Lipoproteins LDL-C = Low Density Lipoproteins 20-MST = Maximal multistage 20-metre shuttle run test MOE = Ministry of Education MOH = Ministry of Health NCD(s) = Noncommunicable disease(s) OECD = Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development PEDALS FFQ = Physical Activity, Exercise, Diet, And Lifestyle Study Food Frequency Questionnaire PACMAC = PreAdolescent CardioMetabolic Associations and Correlates PCA = Principal Components Analysis xviii PWA = Pulse Wave Analysis PWV = Pulse Wave Velocity SBP = Systolic Blood Pressure TC = Total Cholesterol TG = Triglycerides WC = Waist Circumference WHtR = Waist-to-Height Ratio WHR = Waist-to-Hip Ratio WHO = World Health Organization YPAQ = Youth Physical Activity Questionnaire xix Definition of Terms Cardiometabolic health factors = Blood pressure, cholesterol, vascular, and carbohydrate-metabolic Cardiometabolic risk factors/cardiometabolic complications = obesity, hypertension, hyperglycaemia, and hyperlipidaemia Lifestyle factors/modifiable lifestyle factors = Body fatness, physical fitness, physical [in]activity, sedentary behaviour, nutrition, and sleep Physical activity = Active behaviours resulting in an increased energy expenditure Physical fitness = Cardiorespiratory fitness and muscular fitness Physical [in]activity = Physical activity and physical inactivity Physical inactivity = Achieving less than the recommended amount of daily physical activity Sedentary behaviour = Low energy expenditure for long periods of time V̇O₂max = Maximal oxygen uptake 1 CHAPTER 1—INTRODUCTION 1.0 Circumstances and Statement of the Problem Whereas cardiovascular disease (CVD) is typically associated with middle or old age, the atherosclerotic process often initiates early in childhood, and is occurring at an increasing rate (Bridger, 2009; Cote, Harris, Panagiotopoulos, Sandor, & Devlin, 2013; Dobashi, 2016; Sorensen et al., 1994; Stoner, Lambrick, Faulkner, & Young, 2013). In children, early onset of atherosclerosis has been linked to cardiometabolic risk factors such as obesity, and worldwide obesity statistics have nearly tripled since 1975 (World Health Organization [WHO], 2017c). Additionally, in 2016, over 340 million children and adolescents (aged 5 to 19 years) globally were overweight or obese (WHO, 2017c). Overweight and obese children are at increased risk of developing cardiometabolic complications, which could lead to noncommunicable diseases (NCDs; Anderson et al., 2015; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2015b; Ministry of Health [MOH], 2015b; Ogden et al., 2016; WHO, 2017b, 2017c), and NCDs kill 40 million people each year (WHO, 2017b). Furthermore, various lifestyle factors have shown associations with cardiometabolic risk factors; however, it is unknown which lifestyle factor(s) correlate(s) most strongly with cardiometabolic health. The prevalence of childhood obesity is a significant public health concern (S. A. Ali, Ali, Suhail, Tikmani, & Bano, 2016). In New Zealand, childhood obesity increased from 8% in 2006-07 to 12% in 2016-17 (MOH, 2015b), and in 2014, overweight and obesity prevalence in New Zealand children (aged 5 to 17 years) was the third highest worldwide (Anderson et al., 2017; Kelly & Swinburn, 2015; Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development [OECD], 2014). Although frequently cited causes of obesity include: lower than ideal physical fitness (Cohen et al., 2011; Czyż et al., 2017; 2 Stratton et al., 2007), insufficient daily physical activity (O. Ali et al., 2014; Dumuid et al., 2018; WHO, 2017d), sedentary behaviour (Carson, Hunter, et al., 2016; Carson, Tremblay, Chaput, & Chastin, 2016; Griffiths et al., 2016; Healy & Owen, 2010), unhealthy diet (Harrex et al., 2017; WHO, 2015, 2017a), and inadequate sleep (Davison et al., 2017; Sayin & Buyukinan, 2016; Skidmore et al., 2013), no known study has comprehensively assessed the simultaneous associations among these lifestyle factors with cardiometabolic health in preadolescent children. Consequently, uncertainty emerges as to which lifestyle factor(s) associate(s) more strongly with cardiometabolic risk factors, making it difficult to determine the ideal public health intervention and prevention strategy required for improving cardiometabolic health in children. Most public resources are aimed towards the fight against obesity; however, in children the lifestyle factor(s) that associate(s) more strongly with obesity have not been definitively identified. Therefore, additional research analysing the associations among lifestyle factors (body fatness, physical fitness, physical [in]activity, sedentary behaviour, nutrition, and sleep) with cardiometabolic health is essential. Overall, obesity is an outcome of a number of factors and addressing the disease is not the final goal; improving and maintaining cardiometabolic health is the primary objective. Findings from this study will add to the body of knowledge that informs health professionals and health policy writers regarding health and wellness of children and possibly make a positive impact on the deteriorating health of New Zealand children. 1.1 Objectives of Research The overall aim of this thesis was to examine simultaneously the associations among lifestyle factors (body fatness, physical fitness, physical [in]activity, sedentary behaviour, nutrition, and sleep) with cardiometabolic health in New Zealand preadolescent 3 children aged 8 to 10 years. Accordingly, the study was undertaken in primary schools across three regions in New Zealand (Wellington, Canterbury, and Otago) specifically to examine these questions: 1. What are the associations among physical fitness, physical [in]activity, sedentary behaviour, nutrition, and sleep with body fatness in preadolescent children? (Objective 1, Chapter 4) 2. What are the associations among body fatness, physical fitness, physical [in]activity, sedentary behaviour, nutrition, and sleep with cardiometabolic health in preadolescent children? (Objective 2, Chapter 5) 1.2 Outline of Thesis This thesis is divided into six chapters and presented as a hybrid thesis displaying traits of thesis by publication and a traditional monograph approach. This first chapter (Chapter 1) introduces the thesis and presents the study rationale. Chapter 2 presents a review of the literature on cardiometabolic health, body fatness, physical fitness, physical [in]activity, sedentary behaviour, nutrition, and sleep. Chapter 3 is my study protocol paper, which was published in the BMJ Open under the title, “Pre-Adolescent Cardiometabolic Associations and Correlates: PACMAC Methodology and Study Protocol” (Castro et al., 2014). Chapter 4 (Objective 1) and Chapter 5 (Objective 2) were written as research papers and will be submitted for publication after the completion of my PhD. The final chapter (Chapter 6) summarises the findings, implications, future direction, and general conclusions of this thesis. It should be noted that Chapter 4 and Chapter 5 were written as research papers for publication and are based on similar data sets; therefore, the background and methodological sections of these two chapters will have some duplication. 4 CHAPTER 2—LITERATURE REVIEW The following chapter provides an overview of the literature relating to cardiometabolic health and lifestyle factors: body fatness, physical fitness, physical [in]activity, sedentary behaviour, nutrition, and sleep. Many lifestyle factors contribute to cardiometabolic complications; however, uncertainty emerges as to which lifestyle factor(s) associate(s) more strongly with cardiometabolic risk factors in children. This literature review provides an overview of each of the listed lifestyle factors and cardiometabolic risk factors in children, followed by a rationale and evidence supporting the measuring methods applied in this study. 2.0 Cardiometabolic Health 2.0.1 Background Poor cardiometabolic health refers to a group of NCDs that encompass both cardiac and metabolic conditions. Moreover, cardiometabolic risk factors tend to cluster, creating complications that increase the probability of developing an NCD such as CVD (see Figure 1; Ahrens et al., 2014; Bridger, 2009; Trandafir, Frasinariu, Corciovă, Boiculese, & Moscalu, 2017). Of all NCDs, CVD encompasses the highest mortality rates and annually more people die from CVD than any other cause (Frieden & Jaffe, 2018; Trandafir et al., 2017; WHO, 2017a). Additionally, in 2015 it was projected that 17.7 million people would die from CVD, representing 31% of all global deaths (WHO, 2017a). While CVD is typically associated with middle or old age, the atherosclerotic process (see Figure 2) often initiates early in childhood, within the first and second decades of life, and is occurring at an increasing rate (Sorensen et al., 1994; Stoner et al., 2013; Trandafir et al., 2017). 5 Figure 1. Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). Vascular disease is a combination of vascular injury and vascular repair outcomes including: inflammation, oxidative stress, immune dysfunction, vasoconstriction (constriction of blood vessels), increased vascular permeability, and thrombosis, or clotting of the blood (Stein et al., 2008; Vanhoutte, Shimokawa, Tang, & Feletou, 2009). Collectively, vascular disease consists of circulatory system disorders such as endothelial dysfunction, which can lead to atherosclerosis (Stein et al., 2008). Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory progress that initiates from built-up fatty substances inside the artery channels (Beauloye et al., 2007; Kenney, Wilmore, & Costill, 2015). The fatty substances are referred to as plaque or atheroma and are made up of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) Cardiometabolic Risk Factors • Obesity • Hypertension • Hyperglycaemia • Hyperlipidaemia Overview • NCDs are also known as chronic diseases, which result from a combination of genetics, physiological, environmental, and lifestyle risk factors. Modifiable Lifestyle Factors • Body fatness • Physical fitness • Physical [in]activity • Sedentary behaviour • Nutrition • Sleep Main Types of NCD • CVD • Type 2 Diabetes • Cancers • Chronic respiratory diseases 6 Figure 2. The progression of atherosclerosis. Adapted from Vascular Diseases for the Non-Specialist: An Evidence-Based Guide by T. P. Navarro, A. Dardik, D. Junqueira, and L. Cisneros (Eds.), 2017, p. 37. Copyright 2017 by Springer. calcium, lipoproteins, cholesterol, inflammatory cells, fibrin, and other cellular waste substances, although low density lipoproteins (LDL-C) remain the most important component of atherosclerotic plaque accumulation (Navarro et al., 2017; Ross & Glomset, 1976; Sorensen et al., 1994; Stoner, Lambrick, et al., 2014). The progression of 7 atherosclerotic plaque buildup begins with LDL-C accumulation in the blood vessel intima (Navarro et al., 2017; Ross & Glomset, 1976; Sorensen et al., 1994; Stoner, Lambrick, et al., 2014; Tedgui & Mallat, 1999). This accumulated LDL-C becomes oxidised by free radicals and through glycation, which in turn initiates the recruitment of monocytes- macrophages (Kenney et al., 2015; Tedgui & Mallat, 1999). Modified LDL-C consumed by macrophage scavenger receptors is transformed into foam cells (Navarro et al., 2017; Tedgui & Mallat, 1999). This process results in the formation of a fibrous cap containing smooth muscle cells, which permits stabilization of the plaque (Kenney et al., 2015; Navarro et al., 2017; Ross & Glomset, 1976; Sorensen et al., 1994; Stoner, Lambrick, et al., 2014; Tedgui & Mallat, 1999). These substances accumulate over time within the artery walls, narrowing the lumen of the artery, which reduces blood flow through the vessel and thus influences/elevates blood pressure (Beauloye et al., 2007; Ross & Glomset, 1976). Collectively, restricted blood flow has a detrimental effect on the functioning of the heart, brain, kidneys, arms, legs, and pelvis (Ahrens et al., 2014; Bridger, 2009; Trandafir et al., 2017). Endothelial dysfunction precedes atherosclerosis (Bonetti, Lerman, & Lerman, 2003; Davignon & Ganz, 2004). Endothelial cells are a thin layer of cells that line the inside of blood vessels (Bonetti et al., 2003; Davignon & Ganz, 2004). These cells form a smooth protective layer between the blood circulating through the artery in the lumen and the vascular smooth muscle known as the endothelium (Bonetti et al., 2003; Davignon & Ganz, 2004; Kenney et al., 2015). When the endothelium is functioning properly, it produces molecules (nitric oxide, endothelin, and prostaglandin) that provide a protective barrier between toxic substances in the blood and the vessel wall, which in turn helps regulate vascular relaxation, blood clotting, and immune function, so that blood elements 8 and the vascular smooth muscle remain normal (Bonetti et al., 2015; Davignon & Ganz, 2004; Kenney et al., 2015). However, endothelial dysfunction occurs when endothelial cells become disrupted by oxidised free radicals, causing excessive oxidative stress (Davignon & Ganz, 2004; Galley & Webster, 2004; Sprague, Chesler, & Magness, 2010). The disrupted endothelial cells interfere with the normal release and regulation of nitric oxide (Bonetti et al., 2003; Charakida et al., 2005; Davignon & Ganz, 2004), which obstructs the endothelial cells’ ability to dilate properly, causing an imbalance between the narrowing and widening of blood vessels (Bonetti et al., 2003; Charakida et al., 2005; Davignon & Ganz, 2004; Galley & Webster, 2004). In addition, the amount of shear stress stimulus on the intima layer of vessel walls also plays a role in regulating nitric oxide (Davignon & Ganz, 2004; Galley & Webster, 2004; Sprague et al., 2010). Cardiometabolic risk factors that lead to endothelial dysfunction, then atherosclerosis, and subsequently to CVD include: excessive accumulation and storage of adipose tissue in the body (obesity), elevated levels of LDL-C and plasma homocysteine in the bloodstream (hyperlipidaemia), too much glucose in the bloodstream (hyperglycaemia), and excessive blood pressure on the artery wall (hypertension) exerting shear stress on the vulnerable endothelium (see Figure 3; Kenney et al., 2015; Ross & Glomset, 1976; Sorensen et al., 1994; Widmer & Lerman, 2014; WHO, 2017a, 2017b). Preceding cardiometabolic risk factors are modifiable lifestyle factors including but not limited to: excessive body fatness (Bridger, 2009; Trandafir et al., 2017), lower than ideal physical fitness (Cohen et al., 2011; Czyż et al., 2017; Stratton et al., 2007), insufficient daily physical activity (O. Ali et al., 2014; Dumuid et al., 2018; WHO, 2017d), sedentary behaviour (Carson, Hunter, et al., 2016; Carson, Tremblay, et al., 2016; Griffiths et al., 2016; Healy & Owen, 2010), unhealthy diet (Harrex et al., 2017; WHO, 2015, 2017a), and 9 inadequate sleep (Davison et al., 2017; Sayin & Buyukinan, 2016; Skidmore et al., 2013). However, no known study has examined simultaneously the associations among the listed lifestyle factors with cardiometabolic risk factors in preadolescent children. Consequently, uncertainty remains as to which lifestyle factor(s) associate more strongly with cardiometabolic risk factors in preadolescent children. Figure 3. The progression of cardiovascular disease (CVD). 2.0.2 Evaluating Cardiometabolic Health In preadolescent children, cardiometabolic health can be assessed utilising a collection of approaches including: anthropometric indicators (for further information, see section 2.1.2 on evaluating body fatness), pulse wave analysis (PWA), pulse wave velocity (PWV), flow-mediated dilation (FMD), and cardiometabolic biochemical markers. The following paragraphs elaborate on the indicated cardiometabolic assessment methods and 10 present evidence supporting the evaluating procedures chosen for this study over other approaches. Procedures for gauging blood pressure were chosen based on their noninvasive nature and the study’s setting. Blood pressure gauged from the upper arm brachial artery is termed peripheral blood pressure (diastolic DBP, systolic SBP), whereas central blood pressure (CBP) is gauged from the aorta, which is the largest artery through which the heart pumps blood (Hirata, Kawakami, & O'Rourke, 2006). Central blood pressure is the resistance the heart encounters while attempting to pump blood throughout the body. When CBP is elevated, the heart must work harder, which could lead to heart failure. As a result, CBP has been shown to predict hypertension and potential cardiometabolic complications (Hirata et al., 2006; Roman et al., 2007). Central blood pressure can be gauged noninvasively by utilising PWA and PWV. Pulse wave analysis assesses SBP, DBP, CBP, heart rate (HR), and augmentation index pressure (AIx; Stoner, Credeur, Dolbow, & Gater, 2015). The mentioned indicators are estimated by analysing a generated CBP waveform (Stoner et al., 2015). Initially, the pulse pressure wave is formed from the combination of the incident wave (systolic) and waves reflected back from the perimeter (diastolic; J. I. Davies & Struthers, 2003). Then this waveform is transmitted through the arterial wall, generating a corresponding aortic pulse pressure waveform (augmentation pressure), which can be measured and examined on a digital device (J. I. Davies & Struthers, 2003; Stoner et al., 2015). A study carried out on New Zealand children (aged 8 to 10 years; n = 57) found that PWA is an appropriate assessment of cardiometabolic risk in children (Stoner, Lambrick, et al., 2014). However, researchers analysed a small sample size in a laboratory setting; therefore, the results do not allow for accurate comparison to a study design with a sample size of 392 preadolescent 11 children. Yet, PWA is deemed an appropriate assessment method as it investigates the arterial tree mechanisms, including CBP and arterial wave reflection (AIx), and elevated AIx has been identified as a CVD risk predictor (Stoner, Lambrick, et al., 2014). Furthermore, PWA is a simple, noninvasive, valid, and reliable measurement of cardiometabolic risk, particularly in large paediatric epidemiological studies (Hirata et al., 2006; Stoner et al., 2013; Stoner, Lambrick, et al., 2014). However, to my knowledge, there are currently no standard PWA values for assessing a large group of preadolescent children in an uncontrolled field-based environment. Therefore, further paediatric research is necessary in evaluating PWA with other recognised techniques such as PWV and FMD with the intention of establishing reliable standards for applying PWA in preadolescent children (Stoner et al., 2013; Stoner, Lambrick, et al., 2014). Pulse wave velocity identifies functional changes in the large arteries by analysing the rate at which pressure waves transmit through the vessel (Hirata et al., 2006; McCloskey et al., 2014; Stoner et al., 2015). The velocity of the wave is determined by the time needed for the waveform to pass between two points a measured distance apart (pulse wave distance; McCloskey et al., 2014; Stoner et al., 2015). These readings are frequently obtained on the carotid and femoral arteries, which represent the aortoiliac pathway (Hirata et al., 2006; Reusz et al., 2010). Pulse wave velocity is the most widely accepted method to assess arterial stiffness in children and adolescents by the American Heart Association Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, and Obesity in Youth committee (Thurn et al., 2015; Urbina et al., 2009). A studied carried out on German children, adolescents, and young adults (aged 8 to 22 years; n = 1445) found that PWV can help identify arterial stiffness and predict cardiometabolic risk in children and adolescents (Elmenhorst et al., 2015). In this study, data were collected in a school setting from a predominantly Caucasian population; 12 participants only rested for 5 to 10 minutes before blood pressure was assessed. If a measured blood pressure was elevated, the value was excluded (n = 578) from the analyses, thus the results from this study do not provide an accurate sample of blood pressure numbers collected in a school setting (Elmenhorst et al., 2015). Another study carried out on American children and adolescents (aged 4 to 18 years, n = 159) found that increased PWV was associated with body fatness and hypertension (Kulsum‐Mecci et al., 2017). Also in this study, the majority of the participants were Caucasian; therefore, the outcomes from these results may not allow a meaningful conclusion to be drawn for any other racial or ethnic group. Furthermore, it is necessary to point out a few limitations associated with most of the PWV data analysed in children including: the majority of the previous data examined were collected from Caucasian children (Elmenhorst et al., 2015; Kulsum‐Mecci et al., 2017; McCloskey et al., 2014; Thurn et al., 2015), various studies utilised dissimilar markers to assess PWV (e.g., some studies assessed carotid artery to radial artery while others assessed carotid artery to femoral artery; J. I. Davies & Struthers, 2003, Elmenhorst et al., 2015; McCloskey et al., 2014; Thurn et al., 2015), and to my knowledge, there are currently no standardised values for assessing children. Consequently, additional research is required to better understand the relationship among PWV and cardiometabolic risk factors in preadolescent children from all backgrounds, with the intention of establishing reliable standards for implementing PWV in paediatric research. Flow-mediated dilation is the assessment of blood flow by examining endothelial (dys)function and quantifying the percentage increase in the brachial artery diameter in response to blood flow (Ras, Streppel, Draijer, & Zock, 2013; Stoner et al., 2015). By expression, FMD can be defined as the dilation of an artery following an increase in luminal blood flow and internal wall shear stress (Thijssen et al., 2011). A dysfunctional 13 endothelium has been proven to precede and predict cardiometabolic complications and subsequently CVD (Ras et al., 2013; Stoner et al., 2015; Thijssen et al., 2011). A systematic review that examined 23 studies including 14,753 subjects (aged 40 to 80 years) across the globe, found that FMD can predict cardiometabolic risk factors and subsequently CVD (Ras et al., 2013). This study review analysed a large sample; however, all the participants were adults. Therefore, the results reported in this systematic review are not comparable to studies with samples of preadolescent children aged 8 to 10 years. A study carried out on obese German children (aged 11 to 16; n = 96) found that FMD is a consistent and significant marker of identifying early signs of CVD risk in obese children (Meyer, Kundt, Steiner, Schuff-Werner, & Kienast, 2006). However, in this study, the participants were already obese; therefore, the study participants did not represent a population of children of all body types. Additionally, a study carried out on children (aged 6 to 17 years; n = 43) with chronic kidney disease found that children with chronic kidney disease had an increased occurrence of reduced FMD of the brachial artery (A. C. Wilson et al., 2008). In this study, the participants were not free of disease, so do not resemble a population of normative data. Flow-mediated dilation is highly valid and considered the gold standard assessment for endothelial function, however this assessment method is also highly technical, requires a skilled operator (Stoner et al., 2015), and is impractical for large paediatric studies. Additionally, there is limited research available analysing cardiometabolic function in healthy preadolescent children utilising FMD, and to my knowledge, there are currently no standardised values for this age group. Therefore, additional paediatric research is essential to enhance the knowledge surrounding FMD and cardiometabolic health and to establish FMD as a reliable assessment method for endothelial (dys)function in preadolescent children. 14 Cardiometabolic biochemical markers are utilised to assess cardiometabolic risk factors associated with blood chemistry. Blood is collected utilising a venepuncture or finger prick. The venepuncture method punctures a vein with a needle, usually in the arm, whereas a finger prick pokes the tip of a finger drawing minimal blood. Collection of blood markers by venepuncture is invasive and impractical in preadolescent children, whereas blood marker collection by finger prick is simple, valid, reliable, and practical for large paediatric epidemiological studies. There is abundant paediatric research that validates high blood glucose levels (hyperglycaemia) and high levels of fat in the blood (hyperlipidaemia) as metabolic risk factors that predict cardiometabolic complications, and subsequent CVD into adulthood (Ahrens et al., 2014; Li et al., 2016; Sardinha et al., 2016; Trandafir et al., 2017). A study review carried out on European children (aged 2 to 10 years; n = 18,745) found that biochemical markers can be a significant indicator of early signs of metabolic disease in children (Ahrens et al., 2014). Another study carried out on European children (aged 8 to 17 years; n = 4255) discovered that biochemical markers provide a more accurate and consistent evaluation of cardiometabolic risk in children when compared to anthropometric indicators (Sardinha et al., 2016). Additionally, a study carried out on obese Romanian children (aged 8 to 14 years; n = 78) using biochemical markers found that early identification and treatment of cardiometabolic risk is important to reduce and prevent CVD into adulthood (Trandafir et al., 2017). However in this study, the participants were obese, thus do not provide a standard example of children of all body types. Cardiometabolic blood markers are a significant aspect of examining and monitoring cardiometabolic health in children. However, additional research is essential to better understand the relationship among lifestyle factors with cardiometabolic biochemical markers in preadolescent children. 15 Applied cardiometabolic health assessments. In this study, cardiometabolic health was assessed utilising PWA and cardiometabolic biochemical markers: SBP, DBP, CBP, HR, AIx, total cholesterol (TC), high density lipoproteins (HDL-C), LDL-C, triglycerides (TG), serum glucose, and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c). For further information, see section 5.2 in Chapter 5. 2.1 Body Fatness 2.1.1 Background Childhood obesity continues to escalate as a global epidemic and a significant public health concern (Ajala, Mold, Boughton, Cooke, & Whyte, 2017; S. A. Ali et al., 2016; Czyż et al., 2017; W. H. Dietz, 2004; Sayin & Buyukinan, 2016). Worldwide obesity statistics have nearly tripled since 1975 (WHO, 2017c). In 2016, over 340 million children and adolescents (aged 5 to 19 years) globally were overweight or obese (WHO, 2017c). Furthermore, in New Zealand, childhood obesity increased from 8% in 2006-07 to 12% in 2016-17 (MOH, 2015b), and in 2014, overweight and obesity prevalence in New Zealand children was the third highest worldwide (Anderson et al., 2017; Kelly & Swinburn, 2015; OECD, 2014). Obesity is a condition characterised by excessive accumulation and storage of adipose tissue in the body (S. A. Ali et al., 2016; WHO, 2017c). This adipose tissue accumulates when energy intake (nutrition) exceeds energy expenditure (physical activity and exercise), resulting in a positive energy balance over time (Romieu et al., 2017). There are two types of adipose tissue in the body: brown and white (DeClercq, Taylor, & Zahradka, 2008; Stoner, Gaffney, Wadsworth, & Page, 2014). Brown adipose tissue is involved in thermogenesis (DeClercq et al., 2008), whereas white adipose tissue is the main energy reservoir storing fat, hormones, and cytokines to be distributed to cells to help 16 regulate metabolism and insulin effectiveness and to be utilised for energy when necessary (DeClercq et al., 2008; Redinger, 2007). The development and functioning of white adipose tissue is impacted by various cells (vascular cells, fibroblasts, lymphocytes, pre-adipocytes, and macrophages [Ouchi, Parker, Lugus, & Walsh, 2011; Wang & Nakayama, 2010]). As outlined in Figure 4, white adipose tissue is significant to cardiometabolic dysfunction as it initiates the pathological mechanisms associated with obesity, including lipotoxicity and inflammatory responses (DeClercq et al., 2008; Redinger, 2007). Figure 4. The role of inflammation and lipotoxicity on obesity. Adapted from “The Pathophysiology of Obesity and Its Clinical Manifestations,” by R. N. Redinger, 2007, Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 11, p. 856. Copyright 2007 by Gastro-Hep Communications. 17 White adipose tissue executes several functions and has been identified as a key component of the metabolic system (Trayhurn & Wood, 2004). Along with the pivotal role of lipid storage, its major function is stockpiling various hormones and proteins referred to as adipokines (Ouchi et al., 2011; Trayhurn & Wood, 2004). Adipokines consist of billions of cells that perform pro- and anti-inflammatory actions such as assisting with body fatness regulation and the storage of triacylglycerol in fat deposits as energy reserves (Nakamura, Fuster, & Walsh, 2011; Ouchi et al., 2011; Redinger, 2007). However, abnormal production and/or secretion of adipokines can contribute to the pathogenesis of obesity related complications (Ouchi et al., 2011; Trayhurn & Wood, 2004). This occurs because the expansion of fat cells initiates an undesired molecular and cellular variation of the metabolic process, which triggers secretion of adipokines by white adipose tissue, which is identified as an inflammatory response as shown in Figure 4 (Ouchi et al., 2011; Redinger, 2007; Wang & Nakayama, 2010). Adipocytes, macrophages, fibroblasts, lymphocytes, neutrophils, and precursor, foam, endothelial, and immune cells all contribute to the release of adipokines (Fasshauer & Blüher, 2015; Ouchi et al., 2011; Rabe, Lehrke, Parhofer, & Broedl, 2008). Table 2 provides a summary of the sources and functions of key adipokines (Ouchi et al., 2011; Rabe et al., 2008). The release of adipokines could lead to pathological cardiometabolic complications, which disrupt endothelial cells (thrombosis, plaque, atheroma), result in a dysfunctional endothelium, and ultimately lead to atherosclerotic disease (Ouchi et al., 2011; Redinger, 2007; Wang & Nakayama, 2010). For further information on endothelial dysfunction, see section 2.0.1 for background on cardiometabolic health. 18 Table 2 Sources and Functions of Key Adipokines Adipokine Primary source(s) Binding partner or receptor Function Adiponectin Adipocytes Adiponectin receptors 1 and 2, T-cadherin, calreticulin–CD91 Insulin sensitiser Anti-inflammatory Leptin Adipocytes Leptin receptor Appetite control through the central nervous system Secreted frizzled-related protein 5 Adipocytes WNT5a Suppression of pro- inflammatory WNT signalling Resistin Peripheral blood mononuclear cells Unknown Promotes insulin resistance and inflammation through interleukin-6 and tumour necrosis factor secretion from macrophages Retinol binding protein 4 Liver, adipocytes, macrophages Retinol (vitamin A), transthyretin Implicated in systemic insulin resistance Lipocalin 2 Adipocytes, macrophages Unknown Promotes insulin resistance and inflammation through tumour necrosis factor secretion from adipocytes Angiopoietin-like protein 2 Adipocytes, other cells Unknown Local and vascular inflammation Tumour necrosis factor Stromal vascular fraction cells, adipocytes Tumour necrosis factor receptor Inflammation, antagonism of insulin signalling Interleukin-6 Adipocytes, stromal vascular fraction cells, liver, muscle Interleukin-6 receptor Changes with source and target tissue Interleukin-18 Stromal vascular fraction cells Interleukin -18 receptor, Interleukin-18 binding protein Broad-spectrum inflammation Chemokine ligand 2 Adipocytes, stromal vascular fraction cells Chemokine ligand 2 Monocyte recruitment Chemokine ligand 5 Stromal vascular fraction cells (macrophages) Chemokine ligand 2 Antagonism of insulin signalling through the Janus kinase - signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway Nicotinamide phosphoribosyl transferase Adipocytes, macrophages, other cells Unknown Monocyte chemotactic activity 19 Obesity is also associated with lipotoxicity, which is a metabolic disorder resulting from the accumulation of fat in nonadipose tissue (Engin, 2017). Lipotoxicity is the failure of the excessive buildup of fat in cell cytoplasm to combine into lipid droplets, which causes an increase of circulating fatty acids and may result in toxic levels of fatty acids within nonadipose tissue (Engin, 2017). Some previous research has indicated that storing fatty acid as TG inside fat cells protects against fatty acid toxicity. If not stored, free fatty acids would circulate unmonitored within the blood vessels and produce oxidative stress by spreading throughout the body (Engin, 2017). The excessive storage of fat that causes obesity ultimately triggers the release and circulation of fatty acids from lipolysis, which is stimulated by the supportive state of obesity. The discharge of free fatty acids then triggers lipotoxicity, creating oxidative stress to the cytoplasm of cells and mitochondria (Engin, 2017). This excessive accumulation of fat results in an imbalance between the amount of lipids produced and lipids utilised, which is responsible for the processes associated with cellular dysfunction and metabolic disease in many organs (e.g., heart, liver, pancreas) throughout the body (Redinger, 2007; Van Herpen & Schrauwen- Hinderling, 2008). Adipose tissue also stores and releases active compounds such as free fatty acids into the blood circulation; consequently, elevated levels of free fatty acids are frequently associated with obesity (Boden, 2008; M. D. Jensen, 2006). Ordinarily, released free fatty acids travel to cells to be used as energy; however, when introduced in large amounts, they can increase internal glucose production rates and cause insulin resistance (Boden, 2008; M. D. Jensen, 2006). The free fatty acids released from TG also obstruct lipogenesis, which impedes the clearance of serum triacylglycerol levels that then contributes to the development of hyperlipidaemia (Boden, 2008; Redinger, 2007). Additionally, the secretion of free fatty 20 acids by endothelial lipoprotein lipase from accumulated serum TG within elevated lipoproteins causes lipotoxicity, resulting in insulin receptor dysfunction (M. D. Jensen, 2006; Redinger, 2007). This subsequently results in insulin resistance, which can lead to hyperglycaemia (M. D. Jensen, 2006; Redinger, 2007). Furthermore, free fatty acids also reduce usage of insulin-stimulated muscle glucose, which can also lead to a hyperglycaemic state. (M. D. Jensen, 2006; Redinger, 2007). Collectively, these circumstances lead to a cascade of cardiometabolic pathophysiological complications such as sustained insulin resistance, hyperglycaemia, hyperlipidaemia, hypertension, and obesity, which can create a cluster effect and increase the risk of developing a dysfunctional endothelium and subsequently atherosclerosis (Galley & Webster, 2004; Redinger, 2007). Consequently, obesity has been identified as one of the most significant cardiometabolic risk factors in children (P. Dietz, Hoffmann, Lachtermann, & Simon, 2012; Sayin & Buyukinan, 2016). Preceding cardiometabolic risk factors are modifiable lifestyle factors linked to childhood obesity prevalence, which include: lower than ideal physical fitness (Cohen et al., 2011; Czyż et al., 2017; Stratton et al., 2007), insufficient daily physical activity (O. Ali et al., 2014; Dumuid et al., 2018; WHO, 2017d), sedentary behaviour (Carson, Hunter, et al., 2016; Carson, Tremblay, et al., 2016; Griffiths et al., 2016; Healy & Owen, 2010), unhealthy diet (Harrex et al., 2017; WHO, 2015, 2017a), and inadequate sleep (Davison et al., 2017; Sayin & Buyukinan, 2016; Skidmore et al., 2013). However, uncertainty exists as to whether body fatness or another lifestyle factor associates more strongly with cardiometabolic risk factors in preadolescent children. 21 2.1.2 Evaluating Body Fatness Body fatness can be evaluated multiple ways; the most common methods include: bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), skinfold calliper, hydrostatic weighing, DEXA scan, and anthropometric indicators (see Figure 5). The following paragraphs elaborate on the field-based anthropometric indicators commonly implemented in assessing preadolescent children including: body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), waist- to-height ratio (WHtR), waist circumference (WC), and BIA. Also presented are current circumstances supporting the evaluating procedures applied in this study over other approaches (Gaya et al., 2017). Figure 5. Body fatness assessments. Assessing Body Fatness Anthropometric (BMI, WHR, WHtR, WC) PROS • Practical • Easy to administer • Cost and time efficient CONS • Variability of results dependent on measurer skill level • No consistent cutoff points and guidelines for preadolescent children Hydrostatic Weighing PROS • Considered the GOLD standard • Very accurate CONS • Expensive • Embarrassing (pool attire) • Time consuming (offsite location) • Impractical BIA PROS • Practical • Easy to administer • Cost and time efficient CONS • Variability of results dependent on degree of hydration • Testing environment (room temperature) DEXA Scan PROS • Very accurate • Identifies fat locations CONS • Expensive • Time consuming (offsite location) • Embarrassing (must go see a general practitioner) • Impractical Skinfold Callipers PROS • Accurate (when skilled at measuring) • Repeatable CONS • Variability of measurement (same exact spot needs to be measured each time) • Embarrassing (bare skin) • Skilled professional required 22 Anthropometry refers to the study of human body measurements. Thus, anthropometric indicators assess the size, shape, and composition of the human body and are commonly applied to examine healthiness in children (Gaya et al., 2017). Body mass index is calculated as the ratio of body weight in kilograms divided by height squared in metres (kg/m²) and is the most common anthropometric indicator applied to determine total body composition in children (Ajala et al., 2017; Nambiar, Truby, Abbott, & Davies, 2009; Weber, Leonard, & Zemel, 2012). However, BMI has some limitations as the results are based on body weight and not differentiated by fat mass and muscle mass. Additionally, BMI does not account for fat distribution, whereas alternative anthropometric indicators (WHR, WHtR, WC) do (Javed et al., 2015; Sardinha et al., 2016). Furthermore, there are no consistent validated anthropometric cutoff points and guidelines (CDC, 2015a; International Obesity Task Force, 2015; WHO, 2011) for classifying body size and weight status in preadolescent children (MOH, 2015a). Still, there are advantages associated with anthropometric indicators including their being time efficient, noninvasive, and practical for large paediatric epidemiological studies. Studies carried out on Australian and New Zealand children (aged 5 to 17 years; n = 3597; n = 172) found that BMI was not an appropriate measurement of body fatness in children and adolescents (Nambiar et al., 2009; Rush, Puniani, Valencia, Davies, & Plank, 2003). However, one of the studies found anthropometric indicators (WHtR, WC) to be dependable gauges of body fatness because they account for body fat distribution (Nambiar et al., 2009). Moreover, various studies have revealed that BMI (Abarca-Gómez et al., 2017; O. Ali et al., 2014; N. S. O. Jensen, Camargo, & Bergamaschi, 2016), WHR (Roy & Sharma, 2016; Seidell, 2010), WHtR (Kahn, Imperatore, & Cheng, 2005; Savva et al., 2000), and WC (N. S. O. Jensen et al., 2016; Savva et al., 2000) have all been shown to be appropriate preliminary indicators of 23 body fatness in children (Sardinha et al., 2016). Nevertheless, uncertainty still remains as to the significance of BMI when compared to other anthropometric indicators (MOH, 2015a; Sardinha et al., 2016). Overall, BMI is an indicator for body size whereas the other anthropometric indicators (WHR, WHtR, WC) are gauges of body fat distribution (Nambiar, Hughes, & Davies, 2010), and collectively these anthropometric measurements are a good estimate of body fatness in paediatric research (O. Ali et al., 2014; Hara, Saitou, Iwata, Okada, & Harada, 2002; N. S. O. Jensen et al., 2016; Nambiar et al., 2010). Bioelectrical impedance analysis is utilised to estimate body composition, particularly the amount of body fat in comparison to lean body mass (Rush et al., 2003). Initially, the instrument sends an electric signal through the body, which estimates the amount of fluid and tissue (Kushner, 1992; Kyle et al., 2004a). When compared, lean tissue is mostly water whereas fatty issue has minimal water; therefore, the flow resistance of the electric current is utilised to calculate body fat and lean body mass (Kyle et al., 2004a). A study review carried out for 10 years on Brazilian children (aged 7 to 10 years; n = 47,726) found that BIA is a reliable indicator of body fatness when more accurate techniques such as the DEXA scan are not feasible (N. S. O. Jensen et al., 2016). One major limitation in this review was that various BIA devices were utilised across the 27 different studies, therefore, there is no consistency in the results when attempting to determine which BIA device is more reliable when measuring body fat percentage in children (N. S. O. Jensen et al., 2016). An additional study review carried out on German, Austrian, and Swiss children and adolescents (aged 3 to 16 years; n = 3327) found that BIA and BMI were similar with regard to association and reliability of cardiometabolic risk factors in overweight children and adolescents; however, this same study also indicated that BIA is the more appropriate fatness indicator for predicting CVD risk in overweight or obese children into their 24 adolescent years as compared to BMI (Bohn et al., 2015). Conversely, some BIA research has shown inconsistencies with degree of hydration, warmth of testing environment, and reliability in severely obese individuals (Hendel, Gotfredsen, Højgaard, Andersen, & Hilsted, 1996; Kyle et al., 2004b) Ultimately, BIA is an effective assessment of body fatness as it differentiates between body fat and lean body mass. However, BIA does not account for the effects of height and body proportion (Weber et al., 2012), whereas other anthropometric indicators are gauges of body fat distribution (Rush et al., 2003). Therefore, BIA assessment used in conjunction with additional anthropometric measurements provides a more comprehensive estimation of body fatness in paediatric research. Although implemented less frequently in large paediatric epidemiological studies, clinical methods such as skinfold callipers, DEXA scan, and hydrostatic weighing are the most accurate assessments of body fatness based on reliability and validity when compared to anthropometric indicators (N. S. O. Jensen et al., 2016). However, there are also limitations associated with these clinical methods including that they are costly, time- consuming (offsite location), potentially embarrassing, and require a skilled professional. Additionally, they lack paediatric reference values and are impractical for large paediatric epidemiological field-based studies (Javed et al., 2015). In comparison, field-based assessments like BMI, WHR, WHtR, WC and BIA have shown evidence of effectiveness as pre-screening estimates of body fatness (N. S. O. Jensen et al., 2016; Sardinha et al., 2016), and are practical for large paediatric epidemiological studies. Applied body fatness assessments. In this study, body fatness was assessed utilising: body fat (%), fat mass (kg), fat mass index (FMI, fat mass/m2), WHR, and BMI (kg/m2). To measure body fat (%) and fat mass (kg), BIA was utilised. To calculate the anthropometric indices (BMI and WHR), height, weight, WC, and hip circumference were 25 measured using the WHO’s 2007 WC and WHR report (WHO, 2011). To calculate BMI, age and sex-specific BMI z scores were calculated using the WHO growth guidelines (De Onis et al., 2007; WHO, 2018a) and BMI values (overweight and nonoverweight) were categorised using the International Obesity Task Force’s (2015) sex and age-dependent cutoff points (Cole & Lobstein, 2012). For further information, see the data analysis sections in Chapters 4 and 5, sections 4.2 and 5.2, respectively. 2.2 Physical Fitness 2.2.1 Background The terms physical fitness, physical exercise, and physical activity are frequently used interchangeably in the field of health and wellness (Caspersen, Powell, & Christenson, 1985). Physical activity is any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscles that leads to energy expenditure (Caspersen et al., 1985; Castillo Garzón, Ortega, & Ruiz, 2005). Physical exercise refers to physical activity or energetic movements that are planned, structured, efficient, and calculated in the sense that improving and/or sustaining physical fitness is the primary objective (Caspersen et al., 1985; Castillo Garzón et al., 2005). For further information on physical activity, see section 2.3.1 for background on physical [in]activity and sedentary behaviour. Physical fitness, on the other hand, is the ability to carry out tasks with vigour and alertness without undue fatigue to full capacity of physiological potential (Caspersen et al., 1985; Castillo Garzón et al., 2005). Physical fitness is reliant on cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness as both are significant components of physical fitness progression and sustainability (Ortega, Ruiz, Castillo, & Sjöström, 2008; Ruiz et al., 2016). Cardiorespiratory fitness is defined as the ability of the circulatory and respiratory systems to supply oxygen to exercising muscles during sustained physical activity (D. Lee, Artero, Sui, & Blair, 2010; Ruiz et al., 2016). Muscular 26 fitness (strength and endurance) is the ability of the muscle to carry out exertion against resistance and to continue to perform physical movement without fatiguing (Froberg & Andersen, 2005; Ortega et al., 2008; J. J. Smith et al., 2014). Among adults, elevated levels of physical fitness and consistent engagement in physical activity have been shown to decrease the risk of developing cardiometabolic complications (LaMonte et al., 2005; Press, Freestone, & George, 2003; Schmidt, Magnussen, Rees, Dwyer, & Venn, 2016). In children, higher levels of physical fitness have been associated with healthier cardiometabolic profiles and labelled a significant marker of cardiometabolic functioning into adulthood (Cohen et al., 2011; Hamlin et al., 2014; Howe et al., 2016; Leong et al., 2015; Stratton et al., 2007). Significant improvements in the physiological functioning of the body in response to consistent exercise and improved fitness levels include: increased HDL-C and insulin sensitivity, and reduced body weight, blood pressure, inflammation, and LDL-C levels (Lavie et al., 2015; Myers, 2003; D. L. Smith & Fernhall, 2011). For a complete list of the physiological benefits of physical fitness see Table 3 (Lavie et al., 2015; Myers, 2013). Ultimately, consistent physical activity and physical exercise have been shown to improve and sustain physical fitness levels, which contributes to multiple beneficial outcomes for the cardiovascular system, metabolism, and overall functioning of the body (LaMonte et al., 2005; Press et al., 2003; Schmidt et al., 2016). Physical exercise produces a greater need to supply oxygen to the active tissues with the aim of maintaining the production of adenosine triphosphate required to support continued muscle contraction (Lavie et al., 2015; Myers, 2003; D. L. Smith & Fernhall, 2011). Simultaneously, there is also the need to release built-up carbon dioxide created as a consequence of intensified cellular respiration (Lavie et al., 2015; Myers, 2003; D. L. 27 Smith & Fernhall, 2011). In the initial cardiac response, consistent physical exercise increases whole body oxygen consumption in accordance with exercise intensity (Press et al., 2003; D. L. Smith & Fernhall, 2011). This upsurge in oxygen intake subsequently improves myocardial contraction and its electrical consistency, along with increasing stroke volume at rest and during exercise; this leads to a higher maximal cardiac output and oxygen extraction (Lavie et al., 2015; Myers, 2003; Press et al., 2003; D. L. Smith & Fernhall, 2011). These outcomes lead to significant improvements in the physiological functioning of the heart, which is evident both in a lower resting heart rate and at any given level of submaximal cardiac output (Lavie et al., 2015; Press et al., 2003). Table 3 Physiological Benefits of Physical Fitness Decreases/Reductions Increases/Improvements • Reduced blood pressure • Decreased myocardial oxygen demands • Reduced visceral adiposity • Reduced blood and plasma viscosity • Reduced systemic inflammation • Reduction in LDL-C • Reduction in TC • Reduction in glucose levels • Increased insulin sensitivity • Increased exercise tolerance • Improved heart rate variability • Improved endothelial function • Increased capillary density • Increased mitochondrial density • Improved sleep • Increased HDL-C • Maintenance of lean mass Regular cardiovascular workouts increase the HR; therefore, force of contraction increases while exercising, which enhances the heart’s ability to supply oxygen-rich blood to the muscles (D. L. Smith & Fernhall, 2011). Cardiac output is a product of stroke volume and HR, and stroke volume increases during exercise, which increases the rate of circulation (Lavie et al., 2015; D. L. Smith & Fernhall, 2011). In the course of exercising, 28 there is a redistribution of cardiac output with a substantial percentage of output directed to the skin and skeletal muscles (80%) compared with being at rest (20%; Lavie et al., 2015; D. L. Smith & Fernhall, 2011). The percentage of cardiac output supplying the heart is the same; however, the overall amount of blood transported to the heart is greater during exercise compared to being at rest (Lavie et al., 2015; Myers, 2003; Press et al., 2003; D. L. Smith & Fernhall, 2011). As a result, during exercise, blood flow increases to the tissues that are extremely active and decreases to the tissues that are less active (e.g., visceral organs; Lavie et al., 2015; D. L. Smith & Fernhall, 2011). Consequently, this increased blood flow improves shear stress, and enhanced shear stress leads to increased nitric oxide production and bioavailability (Di Francescomarino, Sciartilli, Di Valerio, Di Baldassarre, & Gallina, 2009; Sherman, 2000). Additionally, regular physical activity and exercise lowers inflammatory factors such as plasma fibrinogen concentrations, c-reactive proteins, and white cell count (Di Francescomarino et al., 2009; Press et al., 2003; Sherman, 2000). For further information on the functioning of the endothelium and inflammatory responses, see section 2.0.1 for background on cardiometabolic health and section 2.1.1 on body fatness. Various metabolic adaptations occur in relation to exercise and post-exercise recovery, such as stimulation of lipid oxidation (Froberg & Andersen, 2005; Press et al., 2003). Additionally, alterations in the transport of blood lipids include a higher ratio of HDL-C to LDL-C transferred and increased lipoprotein lipase activity (Froberg & Andersen, 2005; Press et al., 2003). The increase of this pancreatic enzyme enhances the usage of circulating triacylglycerol as energy, which increases the clearing of unwanted circulating lipids even at rest (Froberg & Andersen, 2005; Press et al., 2003). Furthermore, the activation of this enzyme also speeds up the conversion of the very-low-density protein 29 to HDL-C (Froberg & Andersen, 2005; Press et al., 2003). For further information on lipoprotein activity, see section 2.4.1 for background on nutrition. Lastly, consistent exercise enhances sensitivity of the liver, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissue to the actions of insulin (Froberg & Andersen, 2005; Press et al., 2003). Subsequently, there are reductions in fasting insulin levels and the insulin response to glucose, which are associated with increases in the disposal rate for glucose (Froberg & Andersen, 2005; Press et al., 2003). For further information on insulin and glucose, see section 2.1.1 for background on body fatness and section 2.4.1 for background on nutrition. Physical fitness levels that do not meet the Cooper Institute (2014) FitnessGram® cutoff points for children (Howe et al., 2016; Zhu et al., 2010), along with insufficient daily physical activity per MOH (2015c) guidelines, sedentary behaviour (Cohen et al., 2011; Glynn, Emmett, & Rogers, 2005; Hjorth et al., 2013), unhealthy diet (Emmett & Jones, 2015; Harrex et al., 2017; Howe et al., 2016), inadequate sleep (X. Chen, Beydoun, & Wang, 2008; Hjorth et al., 2013; Skidmore et al., 2013), and excessive body fatness (Bridger, 2009; Trandafir et al., 2017) have all been linked to cardiometabolic risk factors (Cohen et al., 2011; Hjorth et al., 2013; Stratton et al., 2007). However, uncertainty exists as to whether physical fitness or another lifestyle factor associates more strongly with cardiometabolic risk factors in preadolescent children. 2.2.2 Evaluating Physical Fitness In preadolescent children, physical fitness (cardiorespiratory and muscular) is commonly assessed utilising V̇O₂max and muscular strength measuring methods. Frequently, V̇O₂max is estimated utilising the maximal multistage 20-metre shuttle run test (20-MST), whereas muscular strength is commonly assessed utilising a handgrip strength test. The following paragraphs elaborate on the indicated physical fitness assessment methods in 30 addition to presenting evidence supporting the evaluating procedures applied in this study over other approaches. The most widely used indicator of cardiorespiratory fitness is maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O₂max; Noonan & Dean, 2000). V̇O₂max can be objectively assessed in a laboratory setting or by utilising field-based methods such as the 20-MST (Hamlin et al., 2014; Ramírez-Vélez, Silva-Moreno, et al., 2017). In a laboratory setting, V̇O₂max is assessed utilising a progressive run test or a cycle test to exhaustion (Hamlin et al., 2014; Ramírez- Vélez, Silva-Moreno, et al., 2017). However, in preadolescent children there are several limitations associated with assessing V̇O₂max in a laboratory setting including cost, time, requirement for sophisticated equipment and trained technicians, and impracticality for large paediatric epidemiological studies. Alternatively, field-based tests like the 20-MST can be implemented to measure cardiorespiratory fitness (Hamlin et al., 2014). In children, the 20-MST is one of the most common field-based tests utilised to assess cardiorespiratory fitness, specifically V̇O₂max (Hamlin et al., 2014; Melo et al., 2011). The 20-MST consists of participants running between two lines set 20-metres apart with a beginning speed of 8.5 km/h-1, which increases by 0.5 km/h-1 at every completed level (Hamlin et al., 2014; Howe et al., 2016; Léger & Lambert, 1982). In accordance with the Cooper Institute (2014) FitnessGram® cutoff points, a “healthy cardiorespiratory fitness zone” is reported if girls achieve a V̇O₂max equal to or greater than 39 and boys achieve a V̇O₂max equal to or greater than 42 (Howe et al., 2016; Zhu et al., 2010). A V̇O₂max below those cutoff points is categorised as “needs improvement fitness zone” for both sexes (Cooper Institute, 2014; Howe et al., 2016; Zhu et al., 2010). A study carried out on New Zealand children (aged 8 to 13 years; n = 53) determined 20-MST is a consistent field- 31 based assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness (Hamlin et al., 2014). The most significant limitation associated with this study was all the participants were from one school and similar in age, body size, and socioeconomic status, therefore only representing a limited sample from the population of New Zealand children. Nonetheless, further studies have confirmed the 20-MST as a valid and reliable field-based test for cardiorespiratory fitness in children (Hamlin et al., 2014; Howe et al., 2016; Léger & Lambert, 1982), and the most commonly utilised cardiorespiratory fitness assessment method in large paediatric epidemiological studies (Ortega et al., 2008). A handgrip dynamometer is utilised to measure handgrip strength, which is an indicator of muscular fitness (Leong et al., 2015). The handgrip strength test involves being seated with shoulders adducted and neutrally rotated, elbow flexed to 90 degrees, and wrist in a neutral position. Participants squeeze the dynamometer handle as hard as possible for three or more seconds, providing a score for each hand. In accordance with the Camry EH101 manual, participants’ handgrip strength is characterised as weak, normal, or strong based on the sex-specific cutoff points. A study carried out on Columbian children and adolescents (aged 10 to 17 years; n = 1950) utilising a handgrip strength dynamometer found that muscular strength had a direct correlation with cardiometabolic risk (Ramírez- Vélez, Peña-Ibagon, et al., 2017) However, in this study, the majority of the participants were teenagers. Teenagers will have larger hands as compared to preadolescents, and as hand size strongly influences handgrip strength results (Ramírez-Vélez, Peña-Ibagon, et al., 2017), the results from this study are not comparable to a study where the participants are preadolescent children aged 8 to 10 years. Another study carried out on European adolescents (aged 12 to 17 years; n = 1053) utilising a handgrip strength dynamometer suggested that enhancing muscular strength could reduce cardiometabolic risk in children; 32 however, hand size, sex, ethnicity, and maturity must be accounted for when analysing the beneficial effects muscular strength has on reducing cardiometabolic risk in children of different ages (Jimenéz-Pavón et al., 2011). Applied physical fitness assessments. The 20-MST and handgrip strength tests have been shown to be reliable indicators of cardiorespiratory fitness and muscular fitness. Additionally, the 20-MST and the handgrip strength test are easy to administer, time efficient, noninvasive, popular in school settings, and practical for large paediatric epidemiological studies. Therefore, in this study, cardiorespiratory fitness was measured utilising the 20-MST and muscular fitness was measured utilising the handgrip strength test. For further information, see the data analysis sections in Chapters 4 and 5, sections 4.2 and 5.2, respectively. 2.3 Physical [In]activity and Sedentary Behaviour 2.3.1 Background More than 80% of the world's adolescent population is not sufficiently active (WHO, 2017d, 2018b). Furthermore, 1.6 million deaths annually can be attributed to insufficient physical activity (WHO, 2017d, 2018b). Over the last four decades, accumulated evidence indicates physical inactivity and/or sedentary behaviour in individuals considerably increases the risk of developing coronary heart disease when compared to individuals who have lived an active lifestyle (Da Silva et al., 2018; Ding et al., 2016; I. M. Lee et al., 2012; Liu & Manson, 2001; Pate et al., 1995; Press et al., 2003; Warren et al., 2010). Physical inactivity is one of the major modifiable risk factors of coronary heart disease (WHO, 2017d, 2018b). In the past, the terms physical inactivity and sedentary behaviour have been used interchangeably. However, being physically inactive signifies not meeting daily physical 33 activity guidelines, whereas being sedentary refers to very low energy expenditure behaviour for an extended period of time (González, Fuentes, & Márquez, 2017; Van der Ploeg & Hillsdon, 2017). Thus, physical inactivity and sedentary behaviour are dissimilar concepts with different definitions, each with its specific health hazards, and therefore need to be addressed independently (González et al., 2017; Van der Ploeg & Hillsdon, 2017). Physical [in]activity physiological pathways to CVD. The MOH (2015c) physical activity guidelines for children and young people aged 5 to 17 years state that an accumulation of at least 1 hour a day of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, with incorporation of vigorous-intensity activities and muscle and bone strengthening activities at least 3 days a week, is the minimal requirement. Physical activity is characterised by the United States’ National Institutes of Health (2016) as any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscle resulting in an increased energy expenditure, including aerobic activities (e.g., bicycling and dancing), muscle strengthening activities (e.g., gymnastics and push- ups), bone strengthening activities (e.g., jumping rope and skipping), and stretching (e.g., daily stretching and yoga; Caspersen et al., 1985; González et al., 2017). To determine the intensity of physical activity the metabolic equivalent method can be applied. Therefore, physical activity intensities are categorised as light-intensity (< 3 metabolic equivalents), moderate-intensity (3-6 metabolic equivalents), and vigorous-intensity (> 6 metabolic equivalents; Caspersen et al., 1985; González et al., 2017; Sheldrick, Tyler, Mackintosh, & Stratton, 2018). In children, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity has been shown to have a positive effect on multiple systems (Faigenbaum & Myer, 2012; Lieberman, 2013; Stoner, Matheson, Hamlin, & Skidmore, 2016). This includes the neuromuscular (promoting skeletal muscle fibre growth), musculoskeletal (straightening and thickening bones), and 34 cardiovascular systems (the arterial system becoming more elastic; Faigenbaum & Myer, 2012; Lieberman, 2013; Stoner, Matheson, et al., 2016). Moreover, adequate levels of physical activity have been shown to have a positive association with cognition, which is linked to motor skills and locomotor movements such as walking, running, throwing, lifting, skipping, etc. (Chaddock-Heyman et al., 2013; Sibley & Etnier, 2003). Cognitive growth, along with motor skill and movement development, sets the foundation for being active and exercising to become fit and sustain a healthy fitness level into adulthood (Chaddock-Heyman et al., 2013; Sibley & Etnier, 2003). In adults, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity has been shown to improve physical fitness levels and has a direct effect on peak physical fitness levels (Booth, Roberts, & Laye, 2012; Nocon et al., 2008; Press et al., 2003). Furthermore, sustained high levels of physical fitness have multiple positive effects on cardiometabolic conditions such as hypertension, hyperglycaemia, hyperlipidaemia, and obesity (Booth et al., 2012; Nocon et al., 2008; Press et al., 2003). For further information on physiological benefits of physical fitness, see section 2.2.1 for background on physical fitness. Overall, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity is associated with multiple progressive cardiometabolic outcomes (González et al., 2017; Van der Ploeg & Hillsdon, 2017). In contrast, light-intensity physical activity (<3 metabolic equivalents) has not been shown to improve physical fitness levels (González et al., 2017; Van der Ploeg & Hillsdon, 2017). Physical inactivity is defined as achieving less than the recommended amount of moderate and vigorous activity on a daily basis per physical activity guidelines (MOH, 2015c). There are detrimental consequences for not meeting the daily physical activity recommendations. In children, not meeting the daily moderate-to-vigorous activity requirements could result in detrimental outcomes for biological development of cognitive 35 functioning and the neuromuscular, musculoskeletal, and cardiovascular systems (Faigenbaum & Myer, 2012; Lieberman, 2013; Sibley & Etnier, 2003). In adults, physical inactivity has been shown to have a direct correlation with type 2 diabetes and obesity (González et al., 2017; Van der Ploeg & Hillsdon, 2017). Obesity also has been shown to have positive correlations with additional cardiometabolic complications such as hypertension, hyperglycaemia, and hyperlipidaemia (Booth et al., 2012; Nocon et al., 2008; Press et al., 2003). For further information on physiological effects of obesity, see section 2.1.1 for background on body fatness. Clearly, physical inactivity is a determinant for overall health and wellness (González et al., 2017; Van der Ploeg & Hillsdon, 2017). Furthermore, recent evidence has shown that both physical inactivity and sedentary behaviour contribute to the global burden of chronic diseases (González et al., 2017; Van der Ploeg & Hillsdon, 2017). Therefore, although physical inactivity and sedentary behaviour are dissimilar concepts, both need to be addressed; however, this should be done independent of the other (González et al., 2017; Van der Ploeg & Hillsdon, 2017). Sedentary behaviour physiological pathways to CVD. Countries like New Zealand and Canada have characterised sedentary behaviour as a major risk factor of CVD in addition to developing and implementing sedentary lifestyle recommendations (Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology [CSEP], n.d.; MOH 2015a, 2015c, 2017; Tremblay et al., 2011). The recommendations state that school-aged and young people (aged 5 to 17 years) should not have more than 2 hours per day of recreational screen time and should limit sitting for extended periods (CSEP, n.d.; MOH 2015a, 2015c, 2017; Tremblay et al., 2011). Sedentary behaviour is characterised as any waking behaviour characterised by an energy expenditure below or equal to 1.5 metabolic equivalents for long periods of time including: sitting, lying, reading, doing homework, playing video 36 games, or operating an electronic device while stationary (MOH, 2015a; Van der Ploeg & Hillsdon, 2017). At present in children there is minimal re