Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. A LEEP Forward: Biodiversity Futures for New Zealand A thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Master of Resource and Environmental Planning at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. Keith Wallace Calder 2007 ii We do not believe that resource management is inherently destructive, but so far the record of its effects on biodiversity is rather bleak. (Noss & Cooperrider 1994:131) Biodiversity decline is New Zealand’s most pervasive environmental issue (Conclusion 2. The State of New Zealand’s Environment report 1997:10.6) In the cloistered tradition of scientific specialization, most ecologists think of the world narrowly, as a system of natural environments beleaguered by human activity. They live, as Aldo Leopold put it, in a world of wounds. They have reason to think this way. Today, less than 10% of the earth’s surface remains in a mostly unchanged state, and only 4% has been set aside in natural reserves. In their own speciality, planners and landscape designers tend to stay in their larger and wholly different world. For them, the bulk of the land has been given over to humanity; and now, they say, people must redesign it to their liking. Neither view, taken to the exclusion of the other, is viable any longer... A few…have come to focus on the intellectually rich domain of overlap between the two fields. The result of their deliberate intermediacy is the new discipline of landscape ecology. (Edward O. Wilson Foreword to Land Mosaics (Forman 1995). iii ABSTRACT Loss of indigenous biodiversity continues in New Zealand. Despite admirable goals in the NZBS 2000 to the contrary, efforts at improved biodiversity conservation have been insufficient to halt loss of significant amounts of indigenous forest and wildlife habitat. Increasing numbers of native species are moving towards critically endangered and extinction. Whatever we are doing in New Zealand, it is not effective enough. The aim of this study is to firstly identify factors contributing to the failure, “to halt the decline of indigenous biodiversity” in New Zealand and to then consider opportunities to overcome these barriers. In considering opportunities, this study then reviews the emerging discipline of landscape ecology as an answer to, at least, some of those factors and the recurring calls from New Zealand ecologists for a more integrated and holistic approach to biodiversity conservation. Recent advances in the planning framework and particularly provisions for biodiversity conservation in England are explored as a model of practical application of landscape ecological principles to land-use planning. From this review, the study proposes a new ‘LEEP’ model for strategic biodiversity conservation that produces a regional-scale spatial conservation map and accompanying policy and implementation guide. Together they provide an integrated and holistic approach to restoring or creating functional landscapes that also recognises and provides for human activities and development. Application of the LEEP model is demonstrated through a case study of the Wellington region. Benefits and potential uses of the map and policy outputs are canvassed. Interviews with leading New Zealand and international ecologists provide an assessment of the current status of landscape ecology and interviewees also act as an expert ‘test panel’ against which the Wellington maps and guides produced from the ‘LEEP’ model are assessed. Finally, suggestions are provided for development of the new model and future research needs towards fuller and more effective implementation of this approach to biodiversity conservation in the New Zealand context. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks go to my supervisor, Dr. Jo Rosier, who not only guided my study but provided the enthusiasm and encouragement towards completion on the several occasions when my own resolve was ebbing. I am also grateful to her, Dr Mark Bellingham and Dr Reed Noss who together provided the inspiration and example for this particular topic. Thanks are due also to the many colleagues and acquaintances in the conservation and planning community who have willingly provided inspiration, encouragement and comments on my work as it developed. Particular mention to those who agreed to be informally interviewed as part of the input to my research and accepted me into their work place and sometimes their homes. Their enthusiasm for my work remains contagious. Thanks go to John Gibson, GIS Coordinator at Greater Wellington Regional Council (now DOC Hokitika), who enthusiastically developed and produced the land cover base maps. Also, Roger Smith of Geographx NZ Ltd, Wellington who produced the series of maps of past and present indigenous vegetation cover for New Zealand and the Wellington region for me, free of cost. I am also very grateful to the staff at Karori Wildlife Sanctuary who have not only supported my work, but also permitted time for study and supervision and accommodated the many occasions when I have either been absent from work or been less available than I might otherwise. They are the true conservation heroes that are forging part of the future securing New Zealand’s unique indigenous biodiversity and inspiring generations of active and armchair conservationists. I hope my work makes a difference and eventually complements theirs. Finally to my family – Janet, Ian, Grant and Megan – apologies for the inconvenience and thanks for the tolerance as I chase my dreams. For the almost daily occasions when I was locked away in the study, researching and writing, when I might have spent more time with you, I will always be grateful. v LIST OF FIGURES 1. Historic Loss of New Zealand Indigenous Forest Cover 2. Original Principles for the Design of Nature Reserves 3. Standard Conceptual Layout of an Ideal Biosphere Reserve 4. A Multiple-Use Model (MUM) 5. A Model Regional Ecological Network 6. North America – An Example of A Proposed Continental-Scale Network 7. A Proposed Regional Reserve Network for Florida 8. East of England Regional biodiversity Map 9. Yorkshire and Humber Region Habitat Density Map 10. Yorkshire and Humber Region Biodiversity Conservation Map 11. The Artificial Symmetry of the Boundary of Egmont National Park Wellington Regional Maps 12. Indigenous Vegetation Loss in the Wellington Region 13. Base Land Cover Map of the Wellington Region 14. Regional Ecological Network for the Wellington Region 15. Strategic Biodiversity Conservation Map for the Wellington Region 16. South Wairarapa Area – Potential Ecolink 17. South Wairarapa Area – Potential Development of an Ecolink vi LISTOF DIAGRAMS 1. Structure of Thesis 2. Structure of Chapter Two 3. Structure of International Literature Review of Landscape Ecology 4. Defragmentation Tools 5. Structure of Section on English Biodiversity Planning 6. Planning Framework for Biodiversity Conservation in England 7. Development of Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) 8. Structure of New Zealand Literature Review 9. The LEEP Model for Strategic Biodiversity Conservation Planning in New Zealand 10. Flow Chart of Inputs and Outputs of the LEEP Model 11. Application of the LEEP Model to a New Zealand Context 12. Inputs to a Strategic Biodiversity Conservation map for the Wellington Region vii LIST OF TABLES 1. Reasons for Lack of Biodiversity Policy Implementation in New Zealand 2. Common Types of Ecological Linkages 3. Types of Connectivity Function 4. Environmental Services and Six Area of Public Policy Influenced by Natural Corridors 5. Five Main Types of Edge Effect 6. Four Essential Elements of a Regional Ecological Network 7. International Distribution of Known Ecological Networks 8. Categories of International Ecological Network Initiatives 9. Protection, Management and Restoration Guidelines for Three Categories of Land 10. Options for Countering Habitat Fragmentation 11. Policy Principles Guiding Biodiversity Conservation in England 12. Information and Evidence – Good Practice Summary from England 13. Good Practice Principles for Opportunity Mapping 14. Policy Framework for Terrestrial and Coastal/Estuary O bjectives 15. Policy Framework for Riverine Objectives 16. Comparison of Landscape Ecology and English Biodiversity Conservation Models 17. Values Underpinning the Significance of Landscape Ecology for Conservation 18. Four Basic Ecological Landscape Elements 19. Design Rules for Functional Ecological Landscapes 20. Good Practice Principles for Strategic Biodiversity Conservation Maps 21. Potential Uses of the Strategic Biodiversity Conservati on Map 22. Land Use Classes for the Base Map 23. Biodiversity ‘Zone’ Characteristics, Function and Management 24. Policy Guide – Conservation Zone Policy Development and Implementation 25. Sample Policy and Implementation Guide for South Wairarapa Ecolinkage Development 26. Agencies and Responsibilities for Implementation of the LEEP Model 27. Checklist – Good Practice Principles for Strategic Biodiversity Conservation Maps 28. Funding Sources for Community and Private Conservation and Ecore storation TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv LIST OF FIGURES v LIST OF DIAGRAMS vi LIST OF TABLES vii CHAPTER ONE - INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Statement of the Problem 1 1.3 Significance of this Research 8 1.4 Aim of Study 9 1.5 Methodology 10 1.6 Limits of Study 12 1.7 Structure of Thesis 14 CHAPTER TWO – INTERNATIONAL LITERATURE REVIEW 16 2.1 Introduction 16 2.2 Landscape Ecology 16 2.2.1 Introduction 16 2.2.2 Landscape Ecology and Reserve Design 18 2.2.3 Ecological Networks 25 2.2.4 Ecological Networks – A Global Perspective 28 2.2.5 Network Management Considerations 33 2.2.6 Landscape Ecology and Land-Use Planning 34 2.2.7 The Current Status of Landscape Ecology - Interviews 36 2.2.8 Conclusions – Moving Beyond Reserves 39 2.3 English Planning Model of Biodiversity Conserv ation 41 2.3.1 Introduction 41 2.3.2 Planning Framework 41 2.3.3 Key Characteristics 42 2.3.4 Opportunity Mapping 51 2.3.5 Examples – Case Studies 53 2.4 Conclusions 58 CHAPTER THREE – NEW ZEALAND CONTEXT 60 3.1 Introduction 60 3.2 Historical Beginnings 61 3.3 Recent New Zealand Literature 63 3.4 Department of Conservation 66 3.5 New Zealand Biodiversity Strategy 2000 68 3.6 National Policy Statement on Biodiversity 71 3.7 NZBS – Five Year Review 72 3.8 Resource Management Act 1991 73 3.9 Ongoing Disquiet - Further New Zealand Work 73 3.10 New Zealand Biodiversity and Climate Change 76 3.11 Conclusions 78 CHAPTER FOUR - THE NEW ‘LEEP’ MODEL 79 4.1 Introduction 79 4.2 The ‘LEEP’ Model 79 4.3 Comparisons - Fundamental Elements & ‘Philosophies’ 80 4.4 Landscape Ecology – Spatial Components 82 4.5 Landscape Design Rules 84 4.6 English Planning Model – Maps and Good Practice Principles 87 4.7 Model Flow Chart 88 4.8 Uses of Maps and Implementation Guide 89 4.9 Summary 92 CHAPTER FIVE - CASE STUDY – WELLINGTON REGION 93 5.1 Introduction 93 5.2 Wellington Regional Context 93 5.3 Application of the ‘LEEP’ Model – Seven Steps 95 5.4 Example – Application of LEEP Model to Priority Location 107 5.5 Implication for Agency Responsibilities 110 5.6 Wellington Application Checklist 111 5.7 Funding Sources 113 5.8 Conclusions 115 CHAPTER SIX - CONCLUSIONS 117 6.1 The Importance of the ‘LEEP’ Model 117 6.2 Evolution into the Future 119 6.3 The Contribution of this Thesis 121 6.4 Future Research and Application of the LEEP Model 122 6.5 Conclusion 124 REFERENCES 127 ACRONYMS 140 APPENDICES 142 Appendix A Wellington Planning Document Review A1 Appendix B Interview Summary A15 Appendix C Landscape Ecology Supplementary Literature Review A32 Appendix D International Ecological Network Projec ts A54 Appendix E English Biodiversity Planning Documents A55 Appendix F English Information Sources A59 Appendix G English Opportunity Mapping Locations A65 Appendix H English Opportunity Mapping Supplementary Details A66 Appendix I LEEP Model ‘Test Panel’ A73 Appendix J Base Land Cover Map Of Wellington Region A74 Appendix K Regional Ecological Network For Wellington Region A75 Appendix L Strategic Biodiversity Conservation Map For Wellington Region A76 Appendix M Strategic Spatial Policy And Objectives For Biodiversity Map A77