2026-09-24T01:58:53Zhttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/server/oai/requestoai:mro.massey.ac.nz:10179/24142025-11-11T14:09:00Zcom_10179_294col_10179_296
DSpace at Massey University
author
McGovern, Derek John
author
McGovern, Derek John
2011-06-12T23:48:55Z
2011-06-12T23:48:55Z
2011
http://hdl.handle.net/10179/2414
Q112887194
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q112887194
Few twentieth-century plays have been adapted into as many media as Bernard Shaw’s
Pygmalion. First performed on stage in 1913, it was published in book form (1916),
turned into a series of screenplays and films (1934–38), modified for a stage musical (My
Fair Lady, 1956) and for a film musical (My Fair Lady, 1964). In addition, the original
text was revised in 1939 and 1941.
This thesis examines the ways in which the play’s core themes have been reworked for
these adaptations through a nexus of interpreters’ and adapters’ intentions, the formal
conventions of the various media, and the interventions of Shaw himself.
Throughout his screenplay and (stage) textual revisions, Shaw strove to emphasise the
anti-romantic nature of the original play and its central concerns of class, independence,
and transformation. On the stage, in Shaw’s retelling of the Pygmalion myth, the point
was not that the “creator” (Higgins) and “creation” (Eliza) fall in love, but rather that the
latter achieves independence from her autocratic Pygmalion. Marriage between the two,
Shaw declared, was unthinkable. To his dismay, however, audiences and critics alike
inferred otherwise, often influenced by the interventions of the play’s interpreters. So via
his prose sequel of 1916 and his 1934–38 screenplay, Shaw emphasised a marital future
for Eliza with Freddy Eynsford Hill (a minor character in the original play) in an attempt
to satisfy these expectations of romance without compromising Eliza’s or Higgins’s
independence. Despite this, filmmakers continued to imply a Higgins–Eliza romance,
whereupon Shaw responded by changing the ending of his stage text and aggrandising
Freddy’s role for his 1941 “definitive” version. Ultimately, however, this damaged the
original play’s structural and tonal unity.
Oddly enough, the musical adaptations of Pygmalion that appeared after Shaw’s death
were more successful in portraying Freddy as a credible romantic foil to Higgins. My
Fair Lady differs significantly from Shaw’s Pygmalion, however, by suggesting that
Higgins’s independence undergoes a transformation as profound as Eliza’s.
This thesis explores the life cycle of Pygmalion and the tensions of authorship caused by
adaptations, and, in particular, Shaw’s attempts to assert his own conception of the text,
and others’ determination to modify it.
The Author
My Fair Lady
George Bernard Shaw
Romance in literature
Authorship
Adaptations
Eliza undermined : the romanticisation of Shaw's Pygmalion : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English at Massey University, Turitea campus, New Zealand
Thesis
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
URL
https://mro.massey.ac.nz/bitstreams/b1c5ea4f-1f0f-459b-b0ad-00bdd25757f6/download
File
MD5
c7ccbe08439ae2b4e5da06a27da6aa2a
1663609
application/pdf
02_whole.pdf
URL
https://mro.massey.ac.nz/bitstreams/0cdf938f-ccba-4554-bde7-5ed8ce680049/download
File
MD5
c0495b6e8902cf3c85434aa352dd4931
157416
application/pdf
01_front.pdf
URL
https://mro.massey.ac.nz/bitstreams/54cc4c7a-bdda-4cea-a8ee-e792c2939741/download
File
MD5
5e6533119ec378aad5469288b3de18b1
953870
text/plain
02_whole.pdf.txt
URL
https://mro.massey.ac.nz/bitstreams/815b013f-6c35-403f-881b-d65ceae157ab/download
File
MD5
1b21305304ec145a825c10fa976cfa74
11134
text/plain
01_front.pdf.txt