Perezgonzalez JD2016-09-302016-09-2030/09/2016FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 71664-1078https://hdl.handle.net/10179/10024Dienes's (2016) article is one of the contributions to the special issue “Bayes factors for testing hypotheses in psychological research…” being published by the Journal of Mathematical Psychology. One concern I have with Dienes's article is its “one-size-fits-all” philosophy. A second concern is the reification of Bayes factors as the solution to the credibility crisis. I find it naive that a single approach is still proposed as the one and only tool for testing data. I also find it naive to assume that Bayes factors, with no clear replicability mechanism attached to them, are the ones to resolve the credibility crisis in psychology.Bayes factorssignificance testingacceptance testingmeta-analysisreplicationFisherNeyman-PearsonJeffreysCommentary: How Bayes factors change scientific practiceJournal article10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01504283023Massey_Dark1701 Psychology1702 Cognitive Sciences