Marques MDKerr JRWilliams MNLing MMcLennan J2021-102021-10PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2021, 30 (7), pp. 854 - 8670963-6625https://hdl.handle.net/10179/16671Public opinion regarding scientific developments such as genetically modified food can be mixed. We suggest such science-based technological innovations are rejected by some because they are perceived to be advanced as part of a conspiracy. In nationally representative samples (Australia n = 1011; New Zealand n = 754), we report the associations between five conspiracism facets and anti-science attitudes. Results indicate broad public opposition to genetically modified food and use of nuclear power, but more acceptance of renewable power, potable recycled water, 5G networks, and childhood vaccinations. There were small to moderate associations between the rejection of scientific innovations and conspiracism. Multivariate models estimating unique associations of conspiracism facets with anti-science attitudes suggested several novel and important relationships, particularly for childhood vaccination, genetically modified food, and 5G networks. We discuss the importance of examining factors such as conspiracism in understanding what may motivate and sustain rejection of scientific evidence-based claims about socially contentious technological innovations.854 - 867conspiracismGM foodpublic opinionscience attitudes and perceptionsvaccinationsJournal article10.1177/096366252110070134444581361-6609Massey_Dark1302 Curriculum and Pedagogy1903 Journalism and Professional Writing2202 History and Philosophy of Specific Fields