We present the analysis of a microlensing event KMT-2022-BLG-0086 of which the overall light curve is not described by a binary-lens single-source (2L1S) model, which suggests the existence of an extra lens or an extra source. We found that the event is best explained by the binary-lens binary-source (2L2S) model, but the 2L2S model is only favored over the triple-lens single-source (3L1S) model by Δχ² ≃ 9. Although the event has noticeable anomalies around the peak of the light curve, they are not enough covered to constrain the angular Einstein radius θE, thus we only measure the minimum angular Einstein radius E,min. From the Bayesian analysis, it is found that that the binary lens system is a binary star with masses of (m1, m2) = (0.46⁺0.25 _^0.35 M , 0.75⁺0.55 _^0.67 M ) at a distance of DL = 5.87⁺1.79 _^1.21 kpc, while the triple lens system is a brown dwarf or a massive giant planet in a low-mass binary-star system with masses of (m1, m2, m3) = (0.43⁺0.35 _^0.41 M , 0.056⁺0.047 _^0.055 M , 20.84⁺17.04 _^20.20 MJ) at a distance of DL = 4.06⁺3.28 _^1.39 kpc, indicating a disk lens system. The 2L2S model yields the relative lens-source proper motion of μrel ≥ 4.6 mas yr⁻¹ that is consistent with the Bayesian result, whereas the 3L1S model yields μrel ≥ 18.9 mas yr⁻¹, which is more than three times larger than that of a typical disk object of ∼6 mas yr⁻¹ and thus is not consistent with the Bayesian result. This suggests that the event is likely caused by the binary-lens binary-source model.

	views
KMT-2022-BLG-0086: Another Binary-lens Binary-source Microlensing Event	0

	views
July 2025	0
August 2025	0
September 2025	0
October 2025	0
November 2025	0
December 2025	0
January 2026	0

	views
502646 PDF.pdf	2

Statistics for KMT-2022-BLG-0086: Another Binary-lens Binary-source Microlensing Event

Total visits

Total visits per month

File Visits