Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJackson, Ashleigh
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-01T21:47:29Z
dc.date.available2017-06-01T21:47:29Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10179/11123
dc.description.abstractBackground: Collection of information that reflects the dietary intake of infants is challenging. Food frequency questionnaires are commonly used to assess habitual dietary intake, as they are quick and easy to administer. Food frequency questionnaires are used within many studies to assess this aspect of an infant’s diet, yet very few have been validated. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the relative validity and reproducibility of a complementary food questionnaire designed to assess food group intake in infants aged 9-12 months. Methods: Participants were a convenience sample of caregivers of infants aged 9-12 months who completed the complementary food questionnaire (CFQ) at baseline (CFQ-1) and four weeks later (CFQ-2) to assess reproducibility. A 4-day weighed food record (4DWFR) was completed between these assessments to determine the validity of CFQ-1. Foods appearing in the 4DWFR were classified into the same 49 food items as the CFQ. Foods from both the 4DWFR and the CFQ were further classified into main food groups (breads and cereals; fruits; vegetables; dairy products; meat and protein; and occasional foods). Agreement between the two methods for intake of main food groups (frequency and grams eaten) was assessed using paired t-tests, correlation coefficients, cross-classification, the weighted κ statistic and Bland and Altman analysis. Results: For grams of food groups consumed, validity correlations ranged from 0.15 (fruit) to 0.65 (vegetables), with an average correlation of 0.36. Correlations were significant for all food groups with the exception of fruit. Correct classification into the same tertile from the CFQ-1 and 4DWFR ranged from 38.7% (vegetables) to 65.2% (breads and cereals). Misclassification into opposite tertiles ranged from 2.0% (occasional foods) to 16.3% (vegetables). Reproducibility correlations were significant for all six food groups and ranged from 0.37 (fruit) to 0.84 (occasional foods), with an average correlation of 0.58. When comparing CFQ-1 and CFQ-2, participants correctly classified into the same tertile ranged from 48.9% (meat and protein) to 72.6% (breads and cereals). Misclassification ranged from 3.9% (breads and cereals) to 11.8% (meat and protein). Conclusion: The feeding assessment tool appears to have reasonable validity and good reproducibility for assessing complementary food group intake in infants aged 9-12 months. The CFQ could be used in future research as a simple way to assess complementary food group intake, where it is not feasible or appropriate to employ weighed food records.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMassey Universityen_US
dc.rightsThe Authoren_US
dc.subjectInfantsen_US
dc.subjectNutritionen_US
dc.subjectEvalutionen_US
dc.subjectNew Zealanden_US
dc.subjectAssessmenten_US
dc.subjectDieten_US
dc.subjectInfanten_US
dc.subjectQuestionnaireen_US
dc.subjectValiden_US
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AREAS::Domestic science and nutritionen_US
dc.titleDetermining the validity and reproducibility of a feeding assessment tool to assess complementary food group intake in New Zealand infants aged 9-12 months : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in Nutrition and Dietetics, Massey University, Albany, New Zealanden_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineNutrition and Dieteticsen_US
thesis.degree.grantorMassey Universityen_US
thesis.degree.levelMastersen_US
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Science (MSc)en_US


Files in this item

Icon
Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record