• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Massey Documents by Type
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Massey Documents by Type
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The evolution of attitudes and approaches to occupational health and safety in New Zealand

    Icon
    View/Open Full Text
    01_front.pdf (1.179Mb)
    02_whole.pdf.pdf (47.16Mb)
    Export to EndNote
    Abstract
    The contemporary expression "excellence" in Occupational Health and Safety is mere rhetoric without a genuine commitment by the parties to positive attitudes involving a meaningful desire to protect the worker. Regretfully, attitudes require stimulation and encouragement to ensure positive growth. One important catalyst for growth is a sympathetic political ideology. In a general sense, New Zealand enjoyed a sympathetic political ideology with the Liberal Government between 1891-1912. The legislation enacted during the first five years of the Liberal Administration was significant and far reaching. The legislative innovations witnessed the face of Industrial Relations being dramatically altered, the embryonic origins of the Department of Labour, the re-focusing of the Trade Union movement and a structure developed for the fledgling Inspectorate. During this era, New Zealand's political ideology was a mixture of socialism, liberalism and pluralism, and was coined as "the social laboratory" by a sceptical international audience. The legislative enthusiasm of the Liberal Administration was followed by a variety of political ideological that were essentially lacklustre in their focus upon Occupational Health and Safety. The casualty was the luckless worker confronted by a bewildering array of legislation that was confusing, heavily prescriptive and very often duplicating. Attitudes of the Inspectorate were confused due to the ill-defined focus and low morale. The Labour Government that was swept into power in July 1984 lacked a real political reforming conviction to alter the status quo and it was not until the National Government came to power in 1990 that dramatic change occurred. The National administration subscribing to a laissez faire doctrine scuttled a century's worth of prescriptive legislation and leaving the worker to fend for himself in a market driven environment, alienated from the hitherto trade union representative by the marginalisation focus of the Employment Contracts Act 1991. As such, the worker can be excused for interpreting the concept of "excellence" with some degree of scepticism.
    Date
    1995
    Author
    Henderson, Barry
    Rights
    The Author
    Publisher
    Massey University
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10179/5828
    Collections
    • Theses and Dissertations
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Copyright © Massey University
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | Copyright Take Down Request | Massey University Privacy Statement
    DSpace software copyright © Duraspace
    v5.7-2020.1
     

     

    Tweets by @Massey_Research
    Information PagesContent PolicyDepositing content to MROCopyright and Access InformationDeposit LicenseDeposit License SummaryTheses FAQFile FormatsDoctoral Thesis Deposit

    Browse

    All of MROCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Copyright © Massey University
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | Copyright Take Down Request | Massey University Privacy Statement
    DSpace software copyright © Duraspace
    v5.7-2020.1