Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPerezgonzalez, Jen_US
dc.date.available2022-05-03en_US
dc.date.issued2022-05-03en_US
dc.identifierhttps://osf.io/7pshw/en_US
dc.identifier.citation2022en_US
dc.description.abstractIn our current regime of COVID-19 testing, a question seems not to be asked: Are we inferring the best we can from our results? Or, put differently, are we testing with severity? This study thus explore the proportion of expected positives and negative cases, with an especial focus on estimating false positives in isolation and estimating false (or unknown) negatives in the remaining population. Both seems to have been chiefly ignored by Government health policy.en_US
dc.publisherOSF Preprintsen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://osf.io/7pshw/en_US
dc.rights(c) The Authoren_US
dc.subjectBayesian statisticsen_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.subjectStatistical inferenceen_US
dc.subjectSeverityen_US
dc.titleWhere are our false positives?en_US
dc.typeInternet Publication
dc.identifier.doi10.31219/osf.io/7pshwen_US
dc.identifier.elements-id454557
pubs.organisational-group/Massey University
pubs.organisational-group/Massey University/Massey Business School
pubs.organisational-group/Massey University/Massey Business School/School of Aviation
dc.identifier.harvestedMassey_Dark
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
dc.publisher.urihttps://osf.io/7pshw/en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record