Browsing by Author "Burlingame B"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Global protein sustainability and the United Nations, through to the 2030 agenda
    (Frontiers Media S.A., 2024-10-15) Burlingame B; Moltedo A; Cafiero C; Hendriks W
    Organizations and initiatives concerned with food security and nutrition have long positioned protein, together with dietary energy, as the keystone for life itself. Indeed, the word protein, derived from the Greek proteios, means ‘of primary importance’. There is a long history of attention to, and controversies over, proteins in UN processes, beginning in the 1930s and continuing to this day. The importance of protein for agriculture, health, food security and nutrition is reflected in the data collected and presented in the statistical databases of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAOSTAT), available per commodity, per country and over an extensive time series. Protein features directly and indirectly in all 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), which constitute the United Nations 2030 Agenda. Most directly involved is SDG 2. The short title for SDG 2 is ‘zero hunger’. The long title offers more detail: end hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Multi-scalar policy uptake of the six-dimensional food security framework
    (Elsevier Ltd, 2025-11-01) Clapp J; Moseley WG; Termine P; Burlingame B
    In 2022, along with colleagues, we proposed a six-dimensional food security framework in a Food Policy viewpoint article that argued for the need to expand the commonly cited four pillar approach (availability, access, utilization and stability) by adding two additional dimensions: agency and sustainability. The proposal was not just for a new conceptual framework for scholarly analysis, but also for its application in policy settings. Over three years later, we are humbled to see widespread uptake of our call to embrace agency and sustainability as dimensions of food security in multiple tyles of policy settings at different scales. This brief policy comment outlines the growing recognition and application of the six-dimensional framework for food security in policy contexts from the global to the local level. We are hopeful that the growing application of this idea will help to make improvements in the global quest to end hunger.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Partnerships for the Sustainable Development Goals: a call for more science
    (Frontiers Media S.A., 2024-04-11) Berry EM; Burlingame B; le Coutre J; Nikolaou CK
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Proposing a unified Mediterranean diet score to address the current conceptual and methodological challenges in examining adherence to the Mediterranean diet
    (Frontiers Media S.A., 2025-09-12) Hwalla N; Trichopoulou A; Delarue J; Adinolfi F; Brighenti F; Burlingame B; Capone R; Dernini S; El Moujabber M; González-Gross M; Vecchio Y; Massouh N; Naja F; Pederiva C
    A plethora of studies has documented the benefits of the Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) for both human and environmental health. At the core of these investigations lies the assessment of adherence to it. In this manuscript, we aim to examine existing original scores used to assess adherence to the MedDiet and propose a framework for a unified score to address current challenges and complement the existing scores. A literature search was conducted to identify original MED scores, excluding those derived from earlier scores. A total of nineteen original scores were identified and examined. At the conceptual level, across existing scores, the following issues were identified: inconsistencies in food items, lack of holistic lifestyle approaches with focus on food-based components, limited cultural specificity, absence of sustainability evaluations, and regional focus solely on economically developed countries. At the methodological level, the majority of scores were based on cutoffs set by the population-specific distributions of dietary intake. Such cutoffs may be in discordance with the dietary recommendations of the different food groups considered. In addition, the definition of “adherence” is inconsistent across the scores, making the interpretation and comparability of the prevalence of adherence another methodological challenge. As a result, a framework for a Unified Mediterranean diet Score (UMEDS) is proposed. This framework consists of 10 food groups (whole grains, fruits, vegetables, dairy products, fish, legumes, olive oil, nuts and seeds, poultry, and red meat). These food groups are the common denominators of a traditional Mediterranean diet. In addition to the food-related components, the UMEDS also addresses physical activity, sleep, conviviality, and culture-specific food consumption (mainly composite dishes based on olive oil). For each of these items, evidence-based cut-offs were proposed. The total score for the UMEDS ranges from 0 to 22 with higher scores indicating a higher adherence (≤12 poor adherence, 13–17 moderate adherence, ≥18 good adherence). By integrating key components of dietary intake, lifestyle habits, and cultural practices, the UMEDS provides a comprehensive unified approach that aligns with global health guidelines and reflects the true spirit of the Mediterranean diet, rooted in food, lifestyle, culture, lifestyle, and traditional knowledge and practices.