Browsing by Author "Corner-Thomas R"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- ItemBody condition scoring of sheep: intra- and inter-observer variability(New Zealand Society of Animal Production (INC), 2020) Corner-Thomas R; Sewell AM; Kemp P; Wood BA; Gray DI; Morris ST; Blair HT; Kenyon PRBody condition scoring (BCS) is a hands-on tool that farmers can use to make decisions about their animal feeding and management. BCS, however, is a subjective measure of the muscle and fat cover of the lumbar spine. Observers, therefore, may show variability in scores both across time and from other observers. This study aimed to determine the intra- and inter-observer variation of both farmers and research technicians as part of a learning exercise of a farmer-learning group based at Massey University between 2011 and 2015. Nineteen farmers and three research technicians condition scored 45 mixed-age ewes on two consecutive days. Data from both farmers and technicians were analysed to determine the intra- and inter-observer variability using a weighted kappa. The results indicate that the majority of farmers and technicians had ‘excellent’ agreement (21 of the 22 observers had kappa values greater than 0.75) between days. Similarly, among pairs of observers the agreement was also ‘excellent’ (212 of 231 comparisons had kappa values greater than 0.75). The distribution of scores that contributed to each median condition score, however, indicated that lower scores (1, 1.5 and 2) has less variability than did higher scores (2.5 or greater). These results suggest that BCS is a robust farm-management tool that can be used with a high degree of repeatability. Keywords: body condition scoring; intra-observer variability, inter-observer variability.
- ItemMethane emissions intensity in grazing dairy cows fed graded levels of concentrate pellets(Taylor and Francis Group, 2024-05-03) Bosher T; Della Rosa MM; Khan MA; Sneddon N; Donaghy D; Jonker A; Corner-Thomas R; Handcock R; Sneddon NThe current New Zealand greenhouse gas inventory predictions assume that dairy cows consume pasture only, but the use of supplemental feeds, including concentrates, on New Zealand dairy farms has increased greatly in recent decades. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of feeding graded levels of concentrates on methane (CH4) emissions in lactating dairy cows within a pastoral system. Early lactation dairy cows (n = 72) were allocated (n = 18 per treatment) to receive 0, 2, 4 and 6 kg dry matter (DM) of treatment concentrates per day during milking. The cows grazed pasture ad libitum and CH4 emissions were measured in the paddocks using automated emissions monitoring systems called ‘GreenFeed’. Gross CH4 emissions (g/d) were similar for cows across the four dietary treatments, while CH4 emissions intensity (g/kg fat and protein corrected milk production (FPCM) and milk solids production) linearly decreased with increasing concentrate inclusion in the diet (P < 0.02). The CH4 intensity decreased linearly (r2 = 0.42) and quadratically (r2 = 0.53) with increasing FPCM production.
- ItemThe Behaviour of Sheep around a Natural Waterway and Impact on Water Quality during Winter in New Zealand(MDPI (Basel, Switzerland), 2023-04-25) Bunyaga A; Corner-Thomas R; Draganova I; Kenyon P; Burkitt L; Giuseppe PAccess of livestock, such as cattle, to waterways has been shown to be a cause of poor water quality due to pugging damage and excretion entering the water. In New Zealand, regulations require that cattle, deer, and pigs are excluded from accessing waterways, but there are no such requirements for sheep. The current study utilised 24 h video cameras, global positioning system units, and triaxial accelerometers to observe the interaction of Romney ewes (n = 40) with a natural waterway. Ewes were either restricted (week 1) or given access to a reticulated water trough (week 2). Proximity data showed that ewes spent more time within 3 m of the waterway when the trough was unrestricted than when restricted (14.1 ± 5.7 and 10.8 ± 5.1 min/ewe/day, respectively; p < 0.05). Ewes travelled shorter distances on the steeper areas of paddock than flatter areas. Similarly, ewes showed a spatial preference for the flat and low sloped areas of the paddock. Concentrations of suspended sediment and total phosphorus were higher during access to a reticulated water trough which coincided with the week with more rainy days. Phosphorus and E. coli concentrations in the stream water samples were the above recommended Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council water quality guidelines, especially after rainy days, but did not appear to be directly related to sheep activity. Overall, the results suggest that during winter, ewes interacted very little with the waterway and were thus unlikely to influence the levels of nutrient and pathogens in the waterway.
- ItemThe Effect of Age of Dam and Birth Rank on the Reproductive Performance of Ewes as One- and Two-Year-Olds.(2021-03-10) Pettigrew E; Hickson R; Morris S; Kenyon P; Corner-Thomas R; Haslin E; Blair HCurrently, 30-43% of New Zealand sheep farmers breed their ewe lambs, but few retain the offspring as replacements for their flock. No difference in lamb production as a yearling among singletons and twins born to ewe lambs and twins born to mature ewes has been reported, provided the ewe lambs had reached the 60-65% of their likely mature weight prior to breeding at seven to eight months of age. The aim of this experiment was to determine the lamb production from singletons and twins born to ewe lambs and twins born to mature ewes during their first two years of lambing. The experiment included 8-month-old ewes born as twins to mature ewes (M2, n = 135), singletons born to ewe lambs (L1, n = 135), and twins born to ewe lambs (L2, n = 88), bred during the same period to the same rams, over two years. The efficiency of lamb production (total litter weight at weaning divided by the pre-breeding weight of the ewe, for all ewes presented for breeding) after two years of production was not significantly different (p > 0.05) among the groups (0.40 ± 0.02, 0.39 ± 0.02, and 0.39 ± 0.03, for M2, L1, and L2, respectively).