Browsing by Author "Han L"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- ItemPatients perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in diabetic eye screening(Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Asia-Pacific Academy of Ophthalmology, 2022-05-01) Yap A; Wilkinson B; Chen E; Han L; Veghefi E; Galloway C; Squirrell DPurpose: Artificial intelligence (AI) technology is poised to revolutionize modern delivery of health care services. We set to evaluate the patient perspective of AI use in diabetic retinal screening. Design: Survey. Methods: Four hundred thirty-eight patients undergoing diabetic retinal screening across New Zealand participated in a survey about their opinion of AI technology in retinal screening. The survey consisted of 13 questions covering topics of awareness, trust, and receptivity toward AI systems. Results: The mean age was 59 years. The majority of participants identified as New Zealand European (50%), followed by Asian (31%), Pacific Islander (10%), and Maori (5%). Whilst 73% of participants were aware of AI, only 58% have heard of it being implemented in health care. Overall, 78% of respondents were comfortable with AI use in their care, with 53% saying they would trust an AI-assisted screening program as much as a health professional. Despite having a higher awareness of AI, younger participants had lower trust in AI systems. A higher proportion of Maori and Pacific participants indicated a preference toward human-led screening. The main perceived benefits of AI included faster diagnostic speeds and greater accuracy. Conclusions: There is low awareness of clinical AI applications among our participants. Despite this, most are receptive toward the implementation of AI in diabetic eye screening. Overall, there was a strong preference toward continual involvement of clinicians in the screening process. There are key recommendations to enhance the receptivity of the public toward incorporation of AI into retinal screening programs.
- ItemResponses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) plant growth, grain yield and quality, and soil properties to the microplastic occurrence in paddy soil(Springer, 18/05/2022) Chen S; Feng Y; Han L; Li D; Feng Y; Jeyakumar P; Sun H; Shi W; Wang HPurpose: Agricultural soil has been recognized as a major sink of microplastic, an emerging pollutant to environmental biodiversity and ecosystem. However, the impacts of microplastic on soil–plant systems (e.g., crop growth, grain yield and amino acid content, nitrogen uptake capacity, and soil properties) remain largely unknown. Methods: Four typical microplastics, i.e., polythene (PE, 200 μm), polyacrylonitrile (PAN, 200 μm), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) in diameter of 200 μm and 10 μm (PET200 and PET10), were tested to assess the consequent aforementioned responses under rice (Oryza sativa L.) paddy soil in a mesocosm experiment. Results: Microplastics multiply influenced the soil pH, NH4+-N and NO3−-N contents, which effects were depended on the rice growth stage and plastic type. Overall, microplastics significantly decreased the soil urease activity by 5.0–12.2% (P < 0.05). When exposed to PAN and PET (in both diameter of 200 μm and 10 μm), there were significantly 22.2–30.8% more grain yield produced, compared to the control (P < 0.05), which was attributing to the higher nitrogen uptake capacity of rice grain. Meanwhile, microplastics exhibited nominal influences on rice plant height, tillering number, leaf SPAD, and NDVI. The amino acids were affected by microplastic, depending on the types of plastics and amino acids. Conclusion: This study provides evidence that microplastic can affect the development and final grain yield, amino acid content, nitrogen uptake capacity of rice, and some major soil properties, while these effects vary as a function of plastic type. Our findings highlight the positive impacts that could occur when the presence of microplastics in paddy soil.