Repository logo
    Info Pages
    Content PolicyCopyright & Access InfoDepositing to MRODeposit LicenseDeposit License SummaryFile FormatsTheses FAQDoctoral Thesis Deposit
    Communities & Collections
    All of MRO
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
Log In
New user? Click here to register using a personal email and password.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Herath M"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Dataset and Baseline for Automatic Student Feedback Analysis
    (European Language Resources Association (ELRA), 2022-01-01) Nilanga K; Herath M; Maduwantha H; Ranathunga S; Calzolari N; Béchet F; Blache P; Choukri K; Cieri C; Declerck T; Goggi S; Isahara H; Maegaard B; Mariani J; Mazo H; Odijk J; Piperidis S
    In this paper, we present a student feedback corpus that contains 3000 instances of feedback written by university students. This dataset has been annotated for aspect terms, opinion terms, polarities of the opinion terms towards targeted aspects, and document-level opinion polarities. We developed a hierarchical taxonomy for aspect categorisation, which covers many aspects of the teaching-learning process. We annotated both implicit and explicit aspects using this taxonomy. Annotation methodology, difficulties faced during the annotation, and the details of the aspect term categorization are discussed in detail. Using state-of-the-art techniques, we have built baseline models for the following tasks: Target oriented Opinion Extraction, Aspect Level Sentiment Analysis, and Document Level Sentiment Analysis. These models reported 64%, 75%, and 86% F1 scores (respectively) for the considered tasks. These results illustrate the reliability and usability of the corpus for different tasks related to sentiment analysis.

Copyright © Massey University  |  DSpace software copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS

  • Contact Us
  • Copyright Take Down Request
  • Massey University Privacy Statement
  • Cookie settings
Repository logo COAR Notify