Browsing by Author "Lühmann D"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Disentangling the relationship of subjective cognitive decline and depressive symptoms in the development of cognitive decline and dementia
    (Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association, 2023-05) Kleineidam L; Wagner M; Guski J; Wolfsgruber S; Miebach L; Bickel H; König H-H; Weyerer S; Lühmann D; Kaduszkiewicz H; Luppa M; Röhr S; Pentzek M; Wiese B; Maier W; Scherer M; Kornhuber J; Peters O; Frölich L; Wiltfang J; Lewczuk P; Hüll M; Ramirez A; Jessen F; Riedel-Heller SG; Heser K
    Introduction Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and depressive symptoms (DS) frequently co-occur prior to dementia. However, the temporal sequence of their emergence and their combined prognostic value for cognitive decline and dementia is unclear. Methods Temporal relationships of SCD, DS and memory decline were examined by latent difference score modeling in a high-aged, population-based cohort (N = 3217) and validated using Cox-regression of dementia-conversion. In 334 cognitively unimpaired SCD-patients from memory-clinics, we examined the association of DS with cognitive decline and with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers. Results In the population-based cohort, SCD preceded DS. High DS were associated with increased risk of dementia conversion in individuals with SCD. In SCD-patients from memory-clinics, high DS were associated with greater cognitive decline. CSF Aß42 predicted increasing DS. Discussion SCD typically precedes DS in the evolution to dementia. SCD-patients from memory-clinics with DS may constitute a high-risk group for cognitive decline. Highlights Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) precedes depressive symptoms (DS) as memory declines. Emerging or persistent DS after SCD reports predict dementia. In SCD patients, more amyloid pathology relates to increasing DS. SCD patients with DS are at high risk for symptomatic progression.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Driving status and health-related quality of life among the oldest old: a population-based examination using data from the AgeCoDe–AgeQualiDe prospective cohort study
    (Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2021-11) Hajek A; Brettschneider C; Lühmann D; van den Bussche H; Wiese B; Mamone S; Weyerer S; Werle J; Leve V; Fuchs A; Röhr S; Stein J; Bickel H; Mösch E; Heser K; Wagner M; Scherer M; Maier W; Riedel-Heller SG; Pentzek M; König H-H
    Background It is almost unknown whether the driving status is associated with HRQOL among individuals in highest age. Aims Based on a multicenter prospective cohort study, the objective of this study was to examine whether the driving status is associated with health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among the oldest old in Germany. Methods Cross-sectional data from follow-up wave 9 (n = 544) were derived from the “Study on Needs, health service use, costs and health-related quality of life in a large sample of oldest-old primary care patients (85+)” (AgeQualiDe). Average age was 90.3 years (± 2.7; 86 to 101 years). The current driver status (no; yes) was used in our analysis. The EuroQoL EQ-5D questionnaire was used to assess HRQOL in this study. Results Regression analysis showed that being a current driver was associated with the absence of problems in ‘self-care’ [OR 0.41 (95%-CI 0.17 to 0.98)], and ‘usual activities’ [OR 0.48 (0.26 to 0.90)], whereas it was not significantly associated with problems in ‘pain/discomfort’ [OR 0.82 (0.47 to 1.45)] and ‘anxiety/depression’ [OR 0.71 (0.36 to 1.39)]. Being a current driver was marginally significantly associated with the absence of problems in ‘mobility’ [OR 0.60 (0.34 to 1.06)]. While being a current driver was not associated with the EQ-VAS in the main model, it was positively associated with the driving status (β = 5.00, p < .05) when functional impairment was removed from the main model. Discussion Our findings provide first evidence for an association between driving status and HRQOL among the oldest old. Conclusions Future longitudinal studies are required to evaluate a possible causal relationship between driving status and HRQOL in very old individuals.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Effects of APOE e4-allele and mental work demands on cognitive decline in old age: Results from the German Study on Ageing, Cognition, and Dementia in Primary Care Patients (AgeCoDe)
    (John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 2021-01) Rodriguez FS; Roehr S; Pabst A; Kleineidam L; Fuchs A; Wiese B; Lühmann D; Brettschneider C; Wolfsgruber S; Pentzek M; van den Bussche H; König H-H; Weyerer S; Werle J; Bickel H; Weeg D; Maier W; Scherer M; Wagner M; Riedel-Heller SG
    Objectives Previous studies have observed protective effects of high mental demands at work on cognitive functioning and dementia risk. However, it is unclear what types of demands drive this effect and whether this effect is subject to a person's genetic risk. We investigated to what extent eight different types of mental demands at work together with the APOE e4 allele, a major risk gene for late-onset Alzheimer's disease, affect cognitive functioning in late life. Methods/Design The population-based German Study on Ageing, Cognition, and Dementia in Primary Care Patients (AgeCoDe, n = 2 154) followed cognitively healthy individuals aged 75 years and older in seven assessment waves. Cognitive functioning was assessed via the mini-mental status examination. Results Mixed-effects modeling (adjusted for education, gender, marital status, stroke, depression, and diabetes) indicated that participants who had an occupational history of working in jobs with high compared to low demands in “Language & Knowledge”, “Pattern detection”, “Information processing”, and “Service” had a slower cognitive decline. APOE e4-allele carriers had an accelerated cognitive decline, but this decline was significantly smaller if they had a medium compared to a low level of demands in contrast to non-carriers. Conclusions Our longitudinal observations suggest that cognitive decline could be slowed by an intellectually enriched lifestyle even in risk gene carriers. Fostering intellectual engagement throughout the life-course could be a key prevention initiative to promote better cognitive health in old age.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    GPs’ awareness of car driving among oldest patients: exploratory results from a primary care cohort
    (Royal College of General Practitioners, 2021-04) Leve V; Pentzek M; Fuchs A; Bickel H; Weeg D; Weyerer S; Werle J; König H-H; Hajek A; Lühmann D; van den Bussche H; Wiese B; Oey A; Heser K; Wagner M; Luppa M; Röhr S; Maier W; Scherer M; Kaduszkiewicz H; Riedel-Heller SG; for the AgeCoDe/AgeQualiDe Study Group
    Background Increasingly more very old people are active drivers. Sensory, motor and cognitive limitations, and medication can increase safety risks. Timely attention to driving safety in the patient–doctor relationship can promote patient-centred solutions. Aim To explore the following questions: do GPs know which patients drive a car? Is fitness to drive addressed with patients? Design & setting Cross-sectional data from patient interviews and GP survey in the ninth follow-up phase of a prospective primary care cohort (the German Study on Ageing, Cognition and Dementia in Primary Care Patients (AgeCoDe) and the Study on Needs, Health Service Use, Costs and Health-Related Quality of Life in a large sample of ‘oldest-old’ primary care patients (≥85 years; AgeQualiDe)) . Method The sample consisted of patients in the age group ≥85 years and their GPs. Independent reports were gathered on driving activity from the GP and the patient, and information was gained from GPs on whether driving ability was discussed with the patient. Statistical analyses included validity parameters and bivariate characterisation of subgroups (non-parametric significance tests, effect size). Results Self-reports of 553 patients were available (69.5% female; mean age 90.5 years; 15.9% drive a car). For 427 patients, GP data were also available: GPs recognised 67.1% correctly as drivers and 94.9% as non-drivers. GPs said that they had discussed fitness to drive with 32.1% of potentially driving patients. Among drivers who were not recognised and with whom driving had not been discussed, there were more patients with a low educational level. Conclusion The GP’s assessment of driving activity among very old patients showed moderate sensitivity and good specificity. Driving ability was seldom discussed. Asking an appropriate question during assessment could increase GPs’ awareness of older patients’ automobility.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Social Isolation and Incident Dementia in the Oldest-Old—A Competing Risk Analysis
    (Frontiers Media S.A, 2022-06) Grothe J; Röhr S; Luppa M; Pabst A; Kleineidam L; Heser K; Fuchs A; Pentzek M; Oey A; Wiese B; Lühmann D; van den Bussche H; Weyerer S; Werle J; Weeg D; Bickel H; Scherer M; König H-H; Hajek A; Wagner M; Riedel-Heller SG
    Purpose: Social isolation is considered a risk factor for dementia. However, less is known about social isolation and dementia with respect to competing risk of death, particularly in the oldest-old, who are at highest risk for social isolation, dementia and mortality. Therefore, we aimed to examine these associations in a sample of oldest-old individuals. Methods: Analyses were based on follow-up (FU) 5–9 of the longitudinal German study AgeCoDe/AgeQualiDe. Social isolation was assessed using the short form of the Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS-6), with a score ≤ 12 indicating social isolation. Structured interviews were used to identify dementia cases. Competing risk analysis based on the Fine-Gray model was conducted to test the association between social isolation and incident dementia. Results: Excluding participants with prevalent dementia, n = 1,161 individuals were included. Their mean age was 86.6 (SD = 3.1) years and 67.0% were female. The prevalence of social isolation was 34.7% at FU 5, 9.7% developed dementia and 36.0% died during a mean FU time of 4.3 (SD = 0.4) years. Adjusting for covariates and cumulative mortality risk, social isolation was not significantly associated with incident dementia; neither in the total sample (sHR: 1.07, 95%CI 0.65-1.76, p = 0.80), nor if stratified by sex (men: sHR: 0.71, 95%CI 0.28-1.83, p = 0.48; women: sHR: 1.39, 95%CI 0.77-2.51, p = 0.27). Conclusion: In contrast to the findings of previous studies, we did not find an association between social isolation and incident dementia in the oldest-old. However, our analysis took into account the competing risk of death and the FU period was rather short. Future studies, especially with longer FU periods and more comprehensive assessment of qualitative social network characteristics (e.g., loneliness and satisfaction with social relationships) may be useful for clarification.