Browsing by Author "Manning MJ"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- ItemBallistic modeling and pattern testing to prevent separation of New Zealand fertilizer products(American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 18/06/2015) Grafton MCE; Yule IJ; Robertson BG; Chok SM; Manning MJIn recent years twin disc centrifugal spreaders have become larger with some manufacturers claiming to be able to spread fertilizer products as far as 60 m. To achieve wider spread widths, the fertilizer particle exit velocity off the disc has increased, as a result the ballistic qualities of the product becomes more critical. This case study uses data-mined information from Ravensdown Fertiliser Co-op Ltd, a major fertilizer supplier. This article examines and researches products used by arable and grassland farmers and studies the effect of changes in product characteristics on spread bout width from these newer spreaders. Ballistic modeling, based on particle density, size, and shape was used to test the distance fertilizer particles travel at various velocities. Fertilizer particle velocities were measured by high speed photometry using both common fertilizers and common spreaders found in New Zealand. Spreading equipment was pattern tested using the New Zealand Spreadmark method. Ballistic modeling of particles proved appropriate in ideal conditions. Fertilizer manufacturers believe that spreader operators often fail to take account of physical characteristics of products being spread and target the widest bout width possible. This can lead to an in-field Coefficient of Variation (CV) which is much greater than 15% and leads to sub-optimal utilization of fertilizer, where variations in particle size distribution occur. Similar situations have been experienced when spreading fertilizer blends; where blends previously spread successfully, at narrower bout widths now separate. Ballistic models could provide bout width recommendations for products and blends, for a range of applicators and reduce crop striping.
- ItemEstablishing a risk profile for New Zealand pastoral farms(Versita, 22/09/2017) Grafton MCE; Manning MJIn this paper, the risk profile of two pastoral production systems in New Zealand are examined. All farmers must manage and mitigate a multitude of risks. Traditionally, a farm budget is solely undertaken to satisfy a lending institution. Limited variance analysis takes place, usually for output prices and inputs such as: interest rates, energy costs, and fertiliser. The authors of this paper use “@Risk”, a risk profiling plug-in tool for Microsoft Excel to demonstrate how farm budgets can be more relevant to farmers. Many risk factors that affect farm financial performance, such as climate and commodity prices, are not controlled by the farmer. Wet summers help hill country sheep and beef pastoral farmers, as more grass growth occurs, which thereby reduces the cost of production and increases revenue, as more stock is finished. Whereas in drought years income falls as stock must be sold prior to finishing, in severe droughts capital stock may also be sold. Input costs also rise as pasture weed invasion occurs; health issues such as rye grass staggers may also add cost. Monte Carlo simulations on model farm budgets for a North Island sheep and beef property and a Canterbury dairy farm help demonstrate the risk profile of each farm type.