Browsing by Author "Parry M"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- ItemModelling time-inhomogeneous incomplete records of point processes using variants of hidden Markov models(Springer Nature, 2025-04-23) Shahzadi A; Wang T; Parry M; Bebbington MMany point processes such as earthquakes or volcanic eruptions have incomplete records with the degree of incompleteness varying over time. For these point processes, the number of missing events between each pair of consecutively observed events can be a random variable that may depend on time, effecting the estimation of parameters or hazard. Such incomplete point processes can be modelled by compound renewal processes where the sum of renewal processes is a random variable because of random variable number of missing events. We propose shifted compound Poisson-Gamma and time-dependent shifted compound Poisson-Gamma renewal processes. Since the number of missing events can be regarded as an unobserved process, the proposed renewal processes are introduced to use in the framework of different types of homogeneous and inhomogeneous hidden Markov models to model the time-dependent variable number of missing events between each pair of consecutively observed events of incomplete point processes. Simulation experiments are employed to check the performance of proposed renewal processes with hidden Markov models. We apply the proposed models to the large magnitude explosive volcanic eruptions database to analyze the time-dependent incompleteness and demonstrate how we estimate the completeness of the record and the future hazard rate.
- ItemSensitivity of Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction Tests for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Through Time(Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2023-01-01) Binny RN; Priest P; French NP; Parry M; Lustig A; Hendy SC; Maclaren OJ; Ridings KM; Steyn N; Vattiato G; Plank MJBACKGROUND: Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests are the gold standard for detecting recent infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Reverse transcription PCR sensitivity varies over the course of an individual's infection, related to changes in viral load. Differences in testing methods, and individual-level variables such as age, may also affect sensitivity. METHODS: Using data from New Zealand, we estimate the time-varying sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR under varying temporal, biological, and demographic factors. RESULTS: Sensitivity peaks 4-5 days postinfection at 92.7% (91.4%-94.0%) and remains over 88% between 5 and 14 days postinfection. After the peak, sensitivity declined more rapidly in vaccinated cases compared with unvaccinated, females compared with males, those aged under 40 compared with over 40s, and Pacific peoples compared with other ethnicities. CONCLUSIONS: Reverse transcription PCR remains a sensitive technique and has been an effective tool in New Zealand's border and postborder measures to control coronavirus disease 2019. Our results inform model parameters and decisions concerning routine testing frequency.
