Browsing by Author "Pauleen DJ"
Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- ItemHarvesting Wisdom on Social Media for Business Decision Making(HICSS, 2022-01-01) Yu J; Taskin N; Pauleen DJ; Jafarzadeh H; Bui TXThe proliferation of social media provides significant opportunities for organizations to obtain wisdom of the crowds (WOC)-type data for decision making. However, critical challenges associated with collecting such data exist. For example, the openness of social media tends to increase the possibility of social influence, which may diminish group diversity, one of the conditions of WOC. In this research-in-progress paper, a new social media data analytics framework is proposed. It is equipped with well-designed mechanisms (e.g., using different discussion processes to overcome social influence issues and boost social learning) to generate data and employs state-of-the-art big data technologies, e.g., Amazon EMR, for data processing and storage. Design science research methodology is used to develop the framework. This paper contributes to the WOC and social media adoption literature by providing a practical approach for organizations to effectively generate WOC-type data from social media to support their decision making.
- ItemInvestigating the Determinants of Big Data Analytics Adoption in Decision Making: An Empirical Study in New Zealand, China, and Vietnam(Association for Information Systems, 2022-06-28) Yu J; Taskin N; Nguyen CP; Li J; Pauleen DJBackground: As a breakthrough technology, big data provides an opportunity for organizations to acquire business value and enhance competitiveness. Many companies have listed big data analytics (BDA) as one of their top priorities. However, research shows that managers are still reluctant to change their work patterns to utilize this new technology. In addition, the empirical evidence on what determines their adoption of BDA in management decision making is still rare. Method: To more broadly understand the determinants affecting managers’ actual use of BDA in decision making, a survey was conducted on a sample of 363 respondents from New Zealand, China, and Vietnam who work in different managerial roles. The dual process theory, the technology–organization–environment framework, and the key associated demographic characteristics are integrated to form the theoretical foundation to study the internal and external factors influencing the adoption. Results: The findings illustrate that the common essential factors across countries linking BDA in decision making are technology readiness, data quality, managers’ and organizational knowledge related to BDA, and organizational expectations. The factors that are more situation-dependent and evident in one or two countries’ results are managers’ predilection toward valuing intuition and experience over analytics and organizational size. Conclusion: The findings enrich the current literature and provide implications for practitioners on how they can improve the adoption process of this new technology.
- ItemMaking sense of COVID-19 over time in New Zealand: Assessing the public conversation using Twitter(PLOS, 2021-12-15) Jafarzadeh H; Pauleen DJ; Abedin E; Weerasinghe K; Taskin N; Coskun M; Mehmood RCOVID-19 has ruptured routines and caused breakdowns in what had been conventional practice and custom: everything from going to work and school and shopping in the supermarket to socializing with friends and taking holidays. Nonetheless, COVID-19 does provide an opportunity to study how people make sense of radically changing circumstances over time. In this paper we demonstrate how Twitter affords this opportunity by providing data in real time, and over time. In the present research, we collect a large pool of COVID-19 related tweets posted by New Zealanders-citizens of a country successful in containing the coronavirus-from the moment COVID-19 became evident to the world in the last days of 2019 until 19 August 2020. We undertake topic modeling on the tweets to foster understanding and sensemaking of the COVID-19 tweet landscape in New Zealand and its temporal development and evolution over time. This information can be valuable for those interested in how people react to emergent events, including researchers, governments, and policy makers.
- ItemMitigating cognitive biases in developing AI-assisted recruitment systems: A knowledge-sharing approach(IGI Global, 2022) Soleimani M; Intezari A; Pauleen DJArtificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in business processes, including the human resource (HR) recruitment process. While AI can expedite the recruitment process, evidence from the industry, however, shows that AI-recruitment systems (AIRS) may fail to achieve unbiased decisions about applicants. There are risks of encoding biases in the datasets and algorithms of AI which lead AIRS to replicate and amplify human biases. To develop less biased AIRS, collaboration between HR managers and AI developers for training algorithms and exploring algorithmic biases is vital. Using an exploratory research design, 35 HR managers and AI developers globally were interviewed to understand the role of knowledge sharing during their collaboration in mitigating biases in AIRS. The findings show that knowledge sharing can help to mitigate biases in AIRS by informing data labeling, understanding job functions, and improving the machine learning model. Theoretical contributions and practical implications are suggested.
- ItemReducing AI bias in recruitment and selection: an integrative grounded approach(Taylor and Francis Group, 2025-03-20) Soleimani M; Intezari A; Arrowsmith J; Pauleen DJ; Taskin NArtificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming business domains such as operations, marketing, risk, and financial management. However, its integration into Human Resource Management (HRM) poses challenges, particularly in recruitment, where AI influences work dynamics and decision-making. This study, using a grounded theory approach, interviewed 39 HR professionals and AI developers to explore potential biases in AI-Recruitment Systems (AIRS) and identify mitigation techniques. Findings highlight a critical gap: the HR profession’s need to embrace both technical skills and nuanced people-focused competencies to collaborate effectively with AI developers and drive informed discussions on the scope of AI’s role in recruitment and selection. This research integrates Gibson’s direct perception theory and Gregory’s indirect perception theory, combining psychological, information systems, and HRM perspectives to offer insights into decision-making biases in AI. A framework is proposed to clarify decision-making biases and guide the development of robust protocols for AI in HR, with a focus on ethical oversight and regulatory needs. This research contributes to AI-based HR decision-making literature by exploring the intersection of cognitive bias and AI-augmented decisions in recruitment and selection. It offers practical insights for HR professionals and AI developers on how collaboration and perception can improve the fairness and effectiveness of AIRS-aided decisions.