Browsing by Author "Sievwright, Olivia"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- ItemThe effect of eye movements on traumatic memories and the susceptibility to misinformation : a partial replication : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Psychology at Massey University, Manawatū, New Zealand(Massey University, 2018) Sievwright, OliviaThe issue of whether certain techniques used in psychotherapy might increase false memories is a major source of contention between cognitive and practising psychologists. Recently, a study by Houben, Otgaar, Merckelbach, and Roelofs (2018) found that bilateral eye movements used in Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing (EMDR) therapy increase susceptibility to misleading information. EMDR is a popular treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder and is primarily thought to reduce the vividness and emotional intensity of traumatic memories. Individuals who undergo EMDR therapy may be more susceptible to misinformation that is inadvertently introduced by the therapist due to reductions in memory vividness. Despite strong theoretical links between eye movements and false memories, few studies have investigated this effect. The current study addressed this issue by attempting to replicate the study by Houben et al. (2018). This study also investigated the working memory account underlying EMDR by comparing eye movements to an alternative dual-task. An initial pilot study comprising a reaction time task established that attentional breathing taxed working memory most comparably to bilateral eye movements. The main study predicted that eye movements would increase susceptibility to misinformation and that eye movements and attentional breathing would lead to comparable reductions in memory vividness and emotionality. 94 students (Mage= 25.74, SDage= 9.68) were recruited to participate in the study at Massey University, Manawatū, New Zealand. Participants viewed a five-minute video depicting a serious car accident. Afterwards, they were randomly assigned to perform either eye movements, attentional breathing, or a control task while simultaneously recalling the car accident. Participants rated the vividness and emotionality of their memory before and after performing the tasks. All participants then received misinformation about the video before completing a recognition test. Results indicated that the misinformation effect was not replicated, with no effect of eye movements on susceptibility to false memories. Findings also suggested that eye movements and attentional breathing were ineffective in reducing the vividness and emotional intensity of the trauma memory. The present study raises questions about the validity of materials and procedures used to instil the misinformation effect. Limitations of the study and key areas for improvement are considered for further investigation.
- ItemMedia exposure to trauma, psychotherapy, and false memories : a recipe for disaster? : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Clinical Psychology at Massey University, Manawatū, New Zealand(Massey University, 2022) Sievwright, OliviaThe proliferation of social media use in recent years has meant individuals are at increased risk of being exposed to images of real-life violence and trauma. This issue, along with growing concerns about the inaccessibility of formal psychological therapy, raises questions about the demand for computer-delivered therapeutic interventions. However, previous research has raised concerns about the potential for some therapeutic techniques to increase susceptibility to misinformation (e.g., Houben et al., 2018). In this thesis, I aimed to test the effects of a computerised trauma intervention on trauma memory vividness, emotional intensity, and susceptibility to misinformation. Experiment One describes novel procedures and materials for investigating misinformation effects in an online context. Participants (N = 99) completed the study online. They first watched a 10-minute video of a fictional school shooting. Between five and ten days later, they were randomly assigned to receive misinformation or no misinformation about the video before completing a recognition test. Misinformed participants were less accurate at discriminating between misinformation and true statements than control participants. This effect was most strongly supported by ROC analyses (Cohen’s d = 0.59, BF10 = 8.34). The study showed the misinformation effect can be established in an online experiment using candid violent viral-style video stimuli. The novel materials developed in Experiment One were employed in a second experiment to test the misinformation potential of Cognitive Bias Modification – Appraisal (CBM-App) training; a computerised trauma intervention. In Experiment Two, participants viewed the school shooting video and rated the vividness and emotionality of the video. They then received a post-trauma debrief via video before being randomly assigned to either complete the CBM-App training intervention or a control task. Participants again rated their memory vividness and emotionality. Five to ten days later, all participants re-rated their memory vividness and emotionality and then received misinformation about the trauma video. Lastly, participants completed a recognition test. Results showed CBM-App training successfully instilled a positive cognitive bias; however, the intervention had no effect on trauma memory vividness or emotionality. ROC analyses also demonstrated no effect of CBM-App training on susceptibility to misinformation. The present research raises questions about the efficacy of CBM-App training for reducing trauma-related distress. Moreover, findings suggest that while there is the potential for memory distortion in many therapeutic interventions, this may not be the case for CBM-App training. This research has implications for the CBM-App, misinformation, and trauma literature. It is hoped the present research provides a foundation for further research investigating therapeutic interventions and misinformation effects in an online trauma context.