Browsing by Author "Smith S"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- ItemHistorical translocations by Māori may explain the distribution and genetic structure of a threatened surf clam in Aotearoa (New Zealand)(Springer Nature Ltd, 2018-11-22) Ross PM; Knox MA; Smith S; Smith H; Williams J; Hogg IDThe population genetic structure of toheroa (Paphies ventricosa), an Aotearoa (New Zealand) endemic surf clam, was assessed to determine levels of inter-population connectivity and test hypotheses regarding life history, habitat distribution and connectivity in coastal vs. estuarine taxa. Ninety-eight toheroa from populations across the length of New Zealand were sequenced for the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I gene with analyses suggesting a population genetic structure unique among New Zealand marine invertebrates. Toheroa genetic diversity was high in Te Ika-a Māui (the North Island of New Zealand) but completely lacking in the south of Te Waipounamu (the South Island), an indication of recent isolation. Changes in habitat availability, long distance dispersal events or translocation of toheroa to southern New Zealand by Māori could explain the observed geographic distribution of toheroa and their genetic diversity. Given that early-Māori and their ancestors, were adept at food cultivation and relocation, the toheroa translocation hypothesis is plausible and may explain the disjointed modern distribution of this species. Translocation would also explain the limited success in restoring what may in some cases be ecologically isolated populations located outside their natural distributions and preferred niches
- ItemLongitudinal survey investigating vectors and reservoirs for Campylobacter colonization of chickens on a New Zealand broiler poultry farm(American Society for Microbiology, 2025-09-17) Kingsbury JM; French N; Midwinter A; Lucas R; Callander M; Hird CP; Smith S; Mulqueen K; Biggs R; Biggs PJ; Ercolini DThis longitudinal survey followed the life cycle of a New Zealand broiler flock to investigate sources of flock colonization by Campylobacter. Samples were collected at frequent intervals from potential Campylobacter reservoirs and sources, transmission routes for Campylobacter ingress into the broiler shed, and to monitor flock colonization. Of the 738 samples, 200 (27%) tested positive for Campylobacter. Campylobacter species from sample isolates included 316 Campylobacter jejuni, 39 Campylobacter coli, and 8 Campylobacter lari isolates; only C. jejuni was isolated from chickens. C. jejuni isolates (n = 199) were sequenced and consisted of seven sequence types (STs); the most abundant was ST6964 (105 isolates). Most flock isolates were ST6964 (44 isolates) or ST50 (27 isolates). ST6964 isolates closely matched those from the previous flock and another age-matched flock on the same farm, supporting a role for an on-farm reservoir contaminating flocks. There were six STs from catching crew and equipment isolates; the most prevalent were ST6964 (19 isolates) and ST50 (21 isolates). The close genetic match, high Campylobacter prevalence in catching samples (59/130, 45%), and the timing of flock colonization occurring closely following catcher presence in the shed support that catchers and equipment might also contaminate the shed and flock from prior flocks that they visited. There was no evidence for wildlife, feed, drinking water, breeder flock, or shed litter as sources of the Campylobacter genotypes colonizing the flock. Taken together, this study identified key areas where the poultry industry might focus on-farm risk management practices to reduce colonization of broiler flocks by Campylobacter.IMPORTANCECampylobacteriosis is the most frequently notified enteric disease in New Zealand, and New Zealand has one of the highest rates of campylobacteriosis among industrialized countries. Reducing Campylobacter colonization of poultry at the farm level would reduce reliance on processing interventions for reducing Campylobacter contamination of broiler meat. This study aimed to identify on-farm sources of Campylobacter contamination in New Zealand broiler chicken flocks. No evidence was found that wildlife, chicken feed, drinking water, or parent breeder flocks were contaminating sources. Instead, carryover of Campylobacter from the previous flock or other farm flocks, and/or contamination from chicken catching crews and their equipment, may have contributed Campylobacter strains that colonized the study flock. These are key areas where the poultry industry might focus on-farm risk management practices to reduce colonization of broiler flocks by Campylobacter.
