Browsing by Author "Spencer NJ"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Novel insights into mechanisms of inhibition of colonic motility by loperamide
    (Frontiers Media S.A., 2024-08-29) Parkar N; Spencer NJ; Wiklendt L; Olson T; Young W; Janssen P; McNabb WC; Dalziel JE; Abalo, R
    BACKGROUND: It is well known that opiates slow gastrointestinal (GI) transit, via suppression of enteric cholinergic neurotransmission throughout the GI tract, particularly the large intestine where constipation is commonly induced. It is not clear whether there is uniform suppression of enteric neurotransmission and colonic motility across the full length of the colon. Here, we investigated whether regional changes in colonic motility occur using the peripherally-restricted mu opioid agonist, loperamide to inhibit colonic motor complexes (CMCs) in isolated mouse colon. METHODS: High-resolution video imaging was performed to monitor colonic wall diameter on isolated whole mouse colon. Regional changes in the effects of loperamide on the pattern generator underlying cyclical CMCs and their propagation across the full length of large intestine were determined. RESULTS: The sensitivity of CMCs to loperamide across the length of colon varied significantly. Although there was a dose-dependent inhibition of CMCs with increasing concentrations of loperamide (10 nM - 1 μM), a major observation was that in the mid and distal colon, CMCs were abolished at low doses of loperamide (100 nM), while in the proximal colon, CMCs persisted at the same low concentration, albeit at a significantly slower frequency. Propagation velocity of CMCs was significantly reduced by 46%. The inhibitory effects of loperamide on CMCs were reversed by naloxone (1 μM). Naloxone alone did not change ongoing CMC characteristics. DISCUSSION: The results show pronounced differences in the inhibitory action of loperamide across the length of large intestine. The most potent effect of loperamide to retard colonic transit occurred between the proximal colon and mid/distal regions of colon. One of the possibilities as to why this occurs is because the greatest density of mu opioid receptors are located on interneurons responsible for neuro-neuronal transmission underlying CMCs propagation between the proximal and mid/distal colon. The absence of effect of naloxone alone on CMC characteristics suggest that the mu opioid receptor has little ongoing constitutive activity under our recording conditions.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Slowed gastrointestinal transit is associated with an altered caecal microbiota in an aged rat model
    (Frontiers Media S.A., 2023-03-14) Parkar N; Dalziel JE; Spencer NJ; Janssen P; McNabb WC; Young W; Butcher J
    Gastrointestinal (GI) motility is largely dependent upon activity within the enteric nervous system (ENS) and is an important part of the digestive process. Dysfunction of the ENS can impair GI motility as is seen in the case of constipation where gut transit time is prolonged. Animal models mimicking symptoms of constipation have been developed by way of pharmacological manipulations. Studies have reported an association between altered GI motility and gut microbial population. Little is known about the changes in gut microbiota profile resulting specifically from pharmacologically induced slowed GI motility in rats. Moreover, the relationship between gut microbiota and altered intestinal motility is based on studies using faecal samples, which are easier to obtain but do not accurately reflect the intestinal microbiome. The aim of this study was to examine how delayed GI transit due to opioid receptor agonism in the ENS modifies caecal microbiota composition. Differences in caecal microbial composition of loperamide-treated or control male Sprague Dawley rats were determined by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. The results revealed that significant differences were observed at both genus and family level between treatment groups. Bacteroides were relatively abundant in the loperamide-induced slowed GI transit group, compared to controls. Richness and diversity of the bacterial communities was significantly lower in the loperamide-treated group compared to the control group. Understanding the link between specific microbial species and varying transit times is crucial to design interventions targeting the microbiome and to treat intestinal motility disorders.