Browsing by Author "Tapuke K"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Mahi Tahi - Rū Whenua: Tangata Whenua & Kairangahau Pūtaiao. Reflective Learnings on Partnering With Indigenous Māori Communities in Field-Based Scientific Research(Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Geophysical Union, 2025-04-16) Mestel ERH; Smith B; Tapuke K; Illsley-Kemp F; Kaiser L; Connon I; Johnston D; Wilson CJN; Leonard G; Clive MAT; Savage MKBetween 2018 and 2022, representatives of local Indigenous Māori communities and emergency management worked in partnership with physical and social scientists during the planning, deployment, and management of a temporary seismometer network around Taupō volcano. This deployment formed part of the Eruption or Catastrophe: Learning to Implement Preparedness for future Supervolcano Eruptions (ECLIPSE) project designed to increase understanding of the large caldera volcanoes in the central North Island of Aotearoa New Zealand. Here we critically reflect on this co-production approach to geophysical network deployment and associated volcano research. We identified a central theme of the creating and holding of space for researchers and communities to engage in the activities through adopting a co-production approach, that embeds representatives of local Iwi (tribal groups) Te Arawa and Ngāti Tūwharetoa as key researchers within a broad project team. We worked to ensure we were respecting communities' time, protocols, and decisions; and to exchange knowledge about the research and results with landowners, community leaders, schools, and young people. Time spent kanohi ki te kanohi (face-to-face) built relationships and trust within and outside the research team that have lasted beyond the scope of the ECLIPSE program. We detail our experiences in the hope of demonstrating that this approach to research is a possible and desirable path for future fieldwork-based research.Item The communication of volcano information in New Zealand–a narrative review(Taylor and Francis Group on behalf of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 2025-02-13) Das M; Becker JS; Doyle EEH; Charlton D; Clive MA; Krippner J; Vinnell LJ; Miller C; Stewart C; Gabrielsen H; Potter SH; Leonard GS; Johnston DM; Tapuke K; Fournier N; McBride SKCommunication of volcano information is critical for effective volcanic risk management. A variety of information is communicated to inform decisions and guide actions for planning, preparedness, and response. Such information needs to be reliable, and fit-for-purpose across different stages of volcanic activity (quiescence, unrest, short or long-term eruptive stages, and the post-eruptive stage). However, an understanding of communication across these different stages of volcanic activity remains limited. We undertook a narrative review of New Zealand literature to explore what information is communicated about volcanoes, across which stages of activity and by whom. Results highlight that NZ literature only documents certain aspects of volcano information and communication, specifically regarding certain locations, stages of volcanic activity (i.e. quiescence or unrest), or hazards. Literature gaps exist regarding volcano communication during unrest and post-eruptive stages, as well as how volcano information evolves between these phases, and how decision-makers use such information. Additional work would be useful to document existing examples of volcano information for different stages of activity. Further research could help in understanding the information needs of decision-makers during each of these stages to improve information and communication.
