Massey Documents by Type

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/294

Browse

Author: search.filters.author.Wilson TMSubject: search.filters.subject.Impact assessment

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Quantifying systemic vulnerability of interdependent critical infrastructure networks: A case study for volcanic hazards
    (Elsevier Ltd., 2024-11-23) Weir AM; Wilson TM; Bebbington MS; Campbell-Smart C; Williams JH; Fairclough R
    Infrastructure networks are vital for the communities and industries that rely on their continued operation. Disasters stress these complex networks and can provoke systemic disruptions that extend far beyond the spatial footprint of hazards. An enduring challenge for assessing infrastructure networks within disaster impact assessment frameworks has been to adequately quantify the high spatial interdependence of these networks, and to consider risk management interventions through time. This is of particular importance for volcanic eruptions, which can produce multiple hazards over highly variable spatiotemporal extents. In this study, we present a methodology for the quantification of systemic vulnerability of infrastructure networks, which can be coupled with physical vulnerability models for the purpose of impact assessment. The two-part methodology first quantifies the haard-agnostic criticality of infrastructural components, inclusive of interdependencies, and then incorporates representative hazard spatial footprints to derive the systemic vulnerability. We demonstrate this methodology using the case study of volcanic eruptions from Taranaki Mounga volcano, Aotearoa New Zealand, where there are many industrial sites of national importance, and a high likelihood of a complex multi-hazard volcanic eruption. We find a considerable increase in the systemic vulnerability of electricity and natural gas network components after incorporating infrastructure interdependencies, and a further increase in the systemic vulnerability of these critical components when cross-referenced with potential volcanic hazard spatial extent. The methodology of this study can be applied to other areas of interest in both its hazard-agnostic or hazard-dependent form, and the systemic vulnerability quantification should be incorporated into impact assessment frameworks.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Agriculture and forestry impact assessment for tephra fall hazard: fragility function development and New Zealand scenario application
    (Volcanica, 2021-12-31) Craig HM; Wilson TM; Magill C; Stewart C; Wild AJ
    Developing approaches to assess the impact of tephra fall on agricultural and forestry systems is essential for informing effective disaster risk management strategies. Fragility functions are commonly used as the vulnerability model within a loss assessment framework and represent the relationship between a given hazard intensity measure (HIM; e.g. tephra thickness) and the probability of impacts occurring. Impacts are represented using an impact state (IS), which categorises qualitative and quantitative statements into a numeric scale. This study presents IS schemes for pastoral, horticultural, and forestry systems, and a suite of fragility functions estimating the probability of each IS occurring for 13 sub-sectors. Temporal vulnerability is accounted for by a ‘temporality/seasonality coefficient,’ and a ‘fluoride toxicity coefficient’ is included to incorporate the increased vulnerability of pastoral farms when tephra is high in leachable fluoride. The fragility functions are then used to demonstrate a deterministic impact assessment with current New Zealand exposure.