Massey Documents by Type

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/294

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Item
    The relationship between interpersonal conflict and workplace bullying : what roles do conflict management style and coping resources play in the prevention of workplace bullying? : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Management at Massey University, Albany, Auckland, New Zealand. EMBARGOED until 1 February 2026.
    (Massey University, 2023-05-09) Hadadian, Zagross
    Workplace bullying is a prevalent organizational problem with significant detrimental effects on individuals and organizations. While scholars have acknowledged that workplace bullying may stem from interpersonal conflict, little research has been conducted on the mechanism through which this occurs. Furthermore, there are few studies that have focused on identifying prevention strategies that could address workplace bullying caused by interpersonal conflict. Although scholars have recommended the use of problem solving as a means of preventing workplace bullying caused by interpersonal conflict, its importance as a preventive measure has not been fully acknowledged by scholars and practitioners. Specifically, there is a need for further research to determine how effective problem solving is in addressing various forms of interpersonal conflict in preventing workplace bullying. Moreover, there is a lack of investigation into how organizations can promote the adoption of problem-solving conflict management as a preventive strategy. Drawing on stress theories and models (such as cognitive appraisal theory and the ARCAS model), this study tested the role of problem-solving conflict management as a coping mechanism and ethical leadership and psychological safety as coping resources in the relationship between task/relationship conflict as a work stressor and workplace bullying. Using structural equation modelling and survey data from 456 employees based in New Zealand, this study found that psychological safety through problem solving moderated the relationship between task conflict and exposure to/enactment of workplace bullying behaviors. However, psychological safety did not moderate the relationship between relationship conflict and the enactment of workplace bullying behaviors through problem solving. Additionally, ethical leadership through problem solving moderated the relationship between task conflict and exposure to/enactment of workplace bullying behaviors. Ethical leadership through problem solving moderated the relationship between relationship conflict and enactment of workplace bullying behaviors. However, neither ethical leadership nor psychological safety moderated the relationship between relationship conflict and exposure to workplace bullying behaviors through problem solving. This study makes three important theoretical contributions. First, this study opens up a new theoretical line by investigating workplace bullying as a strain outcome of interpersonal conflict. Second, this study extends our knowledge about the development of workplace bullying caused by interpersonal conflict by examining the influential role of coping resources on the selection of problem-solving conflict management style as a coping mechanism. Third, by collecting data about exposure to workplace bullying behaviors and enactment of workplace bullying behaviors, this study contributes to a better understanding of how workplace bullying develops. Alongside these theoretical contributions, this study also makes a practical contribution. This study examines the influence of coping resources that can influence the selection of a potentially effective conflict management style to cope with interpersonal conflicts as antecedents of workplace bullying. Therefore, the adoption of any coping resources that significantly encourage an effective conflict management style can be used as a workplace bullying preventive measure by organizations.
  • Item
    Mindfulness experiences of university staff in New Zealand : an integrated workplace mindfulness framework : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Management at Massey University, Albany, Auckland, New Zealand. EMBARGOED until 1 February 2026.
    (Massey University, 2021) Shahbaz, Wahab
    Research on and the practice of mindfulness is increasing in the organisational context. It is generally understood that mindfulness is a human ability or practice which guides the cognitive and psychological processes of employees and informs their decisions and actions in everyday life. Many organisations thus offer mindfulness training programmes to their employees in order to obtain workplace benefits such as improving well-being, inter-relationships, and performance. Much existing work on mindfulness in the organisational context has focused on the consequences of mindfulness interventions and the benefits that the mindful individual can bring to their work. Despite the positive relationship that research has shown between mindfulness and workplace functions, we still know little about how employees actually experience mindfulness. Such an understanding is important to advance organisational strategies and training inventions to promote health, well-being, and the productivity of employees. University staff experience considerable stress at work, and in response many universities around the world have made mindfulness sessions available as part of their staff support practices. Thus, they were an appropriate group to research regarding mindfulness experiences. The purpose of this research was thus to explore the mindfulness experiences of university staff in order to understand their experiences in more depth. In particular, using positive organisational behaviour (POB) as a theoretical lens and conservation of resource (COR) as an additional tool, this thesis focuses on aspects of mindfulness experience that can give insight into how employees enact mindfulness, for example: their everyday practices of mindfulness; their perspectives about workplace outcomes of mindfulness; and what employees perceive to be the facilitating and hindering factors of mindfulness. The research addressed three key research questions: i) how do staff experience mindfulness in the university?; ii) how and why might mindfulness impact on the workplace functions of university staff?; and iii) what individual and workplace factors facilitate or hinder the mindfulness experiences of university staff? To meet the research objectives of this study, a qualitative approach was based on phenomenological enquiry. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 28 faculty and administrative staff from different universities in New Zealand who had attended mindfulness-based training programmes and/or who practised mindfulness. Based on a qualitative thematic analysis of interview material, an integrated workplace mindfulness framework was developed that helps us to understand how employees perceive their mindfulness experiences and practices. First, the framework presents five different kinds of mindfulness-related experiences including formal practices, informal moments, mindful interactions, a state of awareness, and the state of being present. These mindfulness experiences help us to comprehend how staff operationalise mindfulness in the university environment. Second, the framework provides a range of well-being, relationship, and performance-related consequences of mindfulness to address the question relating to the workplace outcomes of mindfulness. Third, the framework elaborates on different mechanisms and functions that explain the relationship between mindfulness and workplace outcomes such as attentional stability, psychological detachment, self-regulation, attentional control, and cognitive flexibility. The mechanisms help us to understand why mindfulness affects workplace functions. Finally, to address the question relating to individual and workplace factors that facilitate or hinder mindfulness, the framework highlights various factors including individual efforts, communal support, and sectoral culture that can influence the application of workplace mindfulness in the university setting. This study contributes to knowledge by providing a comprehensive framework which will assist in the refinement and development of many branches of mindfulness research. In particular, the study discusses relevant aspects of POB and COR to draw out implications for operationalisation, outcomes, mechanisms, and factors affecting workplace mindfulness in the university setting. Practice contributions are also provided. The thesis has implications for the refinement of training practices and organisational efforts in the university sector as well as in other professions to optimise mindfulness programmes for employees’ well-being and productivity.