Massey Documents by Type

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/294

Browse

Has files: YesSubject: search.filters.subject.Signal detection theory

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Effects of alertness on perceptual detection and discrimination
    (Elsevier B.V., 2025-09) Xu Y; Wokke M; Noreika V; Bareham C; Jagannathan S; Georgieva S; Trentin C; Bekinschtein T
    The level of alertness fluctuates throughout the day, exerting modulatory effects on human cognitive processes at any moment. However, our knowledge of how alertness level interacts with specific cognitive demands and perceptual rules of a task is still limited. Here we used perceptual decision-making paradigms to explore this issue. We analysed data from four different experiments involving a total of 113 participants: 1) auditory masking detection, 2) sensorimotor detection, 3) auditory spatial discrimination, and 4) auditory phoneme discrimination. We examined participant performance during the natural transition from awake (high alertness) to drowsy (low alertness). First, we fitted psychometric functions to the performance in EEG-defined high and low alertness metastable states. Second, we modelled slope and threshold from the fitted sigmoidal curves as well as signal detection theory measures, including perceptual sensitivity (d’) and response bias (criterion). We found lower detection and discrimination sensitivity to stimuli as alertness level decreases, signalled by a shallower slope and a lower d’, while the threshold increases slightly and equivalently across experiments. We observed no change in criterion during the transition. Zooming in, we observed that the decrease in sensitivity measured by slope was stronger for discrimination than for detection decisions, indicating that lower alertness impairs the precision of decisions in discriminating alternatives more than in identifying the presence of a stimulus around the threshold. Taken together, these results suggest that alertness has a common effect on perceptual decision-making and differentially modulates detection and discrimination decisions.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Criterion variance in signal detection theory : the interactive effect of knowledge of results and task difficulty on binary decision tasks : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Psychology at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
    (Massey University, 2010) Taylor, Robert T.
    Within traditional Signal Detection Theory (SDT) experiments decision noise is very rarely considered, with researchers clinging to the assumption that the decision criterion has no associated variability. This assumption is incorrect. Furthermore, two factors contribute to criterion fluctuation: task difficulty and the type of knowledge of results (KR) delivered to the observer. The accepted standard in SDT experiments is to provide veridical trial-by-trial feedback (TTKRe). This type of KR may adversely affect observer performance when the decision task is difficult, as the KR may appear highly inconsistent to the observer. The present study hypothesised that providing KR relative to the optimal criterion location (TTKRi) would minimise criterion fluctuation. The present Criterion Variance Model (CVM) assumes that the decision criterion in SDT is subject to fluctuation. Two hypotheses were derived to test the model: a) contrary to the assumption of SDT, the decision criterion in a signal detection task is a variable rather than a fixed value on the decision axis, and is present within binary discrimination tasks; and b) There will be an interaction effect between the type of TTKR provided and the difficulty level of the task. Specifically, TTKRi will enable more accurate decision making than TTKRe, but only for a difficult decision task. Forty-four observers took part in a simple binary decision task, discriminating whether a presented tone was high or low in frequency (Hz). All tones were easily discriminable from each other; thus, the experiment was free from sensory noise. Task difficulty was manipulated by varying the degree of overlap between the high and low distributions, from which the high and low tones were sampled. As predicted by the CVM, performance in a difficult decision task was affected by the type of KR provided. Observers who received TTKRe performed less well than observers who received TTKRi in the more difficult version of the task. Despite mean criterion location measures across groups approaching zero – the optimal location – criterion fluctuation was evident when observer error distributions were analysed. Furthermore, the degree of criterion fluctuation was large, and was associated with the level of task difficulty. A major caveat was the lack of a no KR condition. Consequently, the degree to which observers utilised the KR could not be fully assessed. Additionally, the number of tones may have been too small, possibly encouraging observers not to use the KR provided in a consistent manner. Further research should incorporate a no KR condition and increase the number of tonal stimuli while ensuring the tones are still separated by 3 or 4 JNDs. Despite these design issues, the results highlight the potential detrimental effects of veridical KR on performance, particularly under conditions of high uncertainty.