Massey Documents by Type

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/294

Browse

Subject: search.filters.subject.Airplanes

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Digital vs paper-based checklists in high performance single pilot aircraft : a mixed methods investigation : a 190.895 (60 credit) research report presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Aviation at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
    (Massey University, 2022) Barron, Peter
    The aircraft checklist has been described as the most critical man-machine interface in aviation. Checklists can significantly enhance flight safety when designed well and used properly. The ‘look’ and content of a checklist affects how well pilots interact with it. Emergency checklists in particular, are only accessed during emergency situations, a time of heightened stress and cognitive degradation for the pilot. It is crucial therefore, that emergency checklists are developed with precision and skill to facilitate ease of use during times of stress. A poorly designed checklist can hinder rectification of an emergency situation and can adversely affect flight safety. The aim of this study was to determine whether flying performance is improved, and pilot workload is lower, when using a digital checklist application created specifically for the T-6C Texan II compared with the existing paper-based Quick Reference Handbook (QRH). For this study, twenty pilots from the Royal New Zealand Air Force (RNZAF) underwent two emergency scenarios in a flight simulator using either the QRH or the digital checklist application. The independent variable was checklist type (paper or digital). Dependent variables were: i) time to find the checklist; ii) time to complete the checklist; iii) flight path accuracy; and iv) workload. Additionally, a qualitative investigation into error occurrences during checklist execution was undertaken. The results suggested that workload is lower when using the digital checklist application compared to the QRH, but there were mixed results regarding the improvement in flying performance with the digital checklist application. The time to find the checklist was quicker with the digital application, but checklist completion times and flight path accuracy were similar across both checklist types. The qualitative investigation noted that the digital checklist reduced errors and was easier to manipulate. The collection of qualitative data enabled the generation of a hypothesis that frequency and type of error occurrences are affected by checklist type. Despite the interface improvements of the digital checklist over the QRH, this research suggests that an enhanced checklist interface is secondary to checklist location or checklist content, and that the greatest gains in safety will likely be achieved by addressing these two factors over checklist interface. This research provides support for an iPad mount in front of the pilot in the T-6C. Additionally, this research provides further evidence that the T-6C checklist content is poorly written and can negatively impact flight safety and may assist in arguing for a content re-write. From a wider perspective, most RNZAF pilots fly with a kneeboard and this research may be relevant for other aircraft types operated by the RNZAF, noting also that other aircraft types are flown by two pilots which may negate some of the findings in this research. Further research should standardise the placement of the checklist to fully determine the relationship between flying performance and checklist type. Additionally, future research could also make use of eye tracking equipment to measure attention switching and could investigate the hypothesis generated from the qualitative data.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Modelling pilot decision-making errors in New Zealand general aviation : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Social Sciences at Massey University
    (Massey University, 1992) Pitham, Claire
    Accident statistics indicate that the rate of mortality and financial loss associated with general aviation accidents is comparable with that of passenger transport operations. However, general aviation appears under­ represented in literature pertaining to the development of safety interventions. In this thesis, this apparent disparity is addressed in an investigation of pilot error in New Zealand general aviation. Using the precedent of accident modelling developed in industrial safety research, accident models taken from aviation, road transport and industrial settings are reviewed for their representation of human error. The Surry Model (1969), a twelve point sequence representing operator decision making processes, was selected for generalization to aviation. The selection of this model was congruous with research literature identifying poor decision making as a primary causal factor in air accidents. Each of the points in the model represents an opportunity for accident avoidance if certain information processing requirements are met. The model presents accident avoidance as the result of three processes: the correct recognition of stimuli, the correct cognitive processing of avoidance options, and the correct implementation of physiological responses. The accident sequence within which these processes occur is divided into two cycles: the build-up of danger in the system, and its subsequent release. The model was applied to a data base of 84 cases involving fixed wing aircraft engaged in general aviation, selected from 1980 to 1991. The point at which an error in pilot decision making occurred was identified and coded using the twelve points of the Surry Model. These data were combined with information concerning biographic characteristics of the pilots, and the number of passengers on board the flight. All pilots in the sample were male. Two research questions were investigated. The first questions whether the Surry Model is a useful tool in the analysis of information about accident sequences. The model was used as a template, and laid over the time line of accidents, as they had been determined by air accident investigators. The second research questions sought to determine whether the format of the model could be used as a protocol for developing time lines and questioning pilots during accident investigations. A small final sample size resulted in a general dichotomizing of the variables for non-parametric Chi Square statistical analysis. The power and utility of the analysis was limited and could only show that, beyond chance effects, there were no biographic characteristics of pilots that influenced the cycle of the model in which the accident inducing error occurred. No quantitative examination of the twelve error types identified by the model was possible. A low level of inter-rater reliability showed that the model was not as self-contained as anticipated. Raters appeared to use the model in a consistent manner, but modes of use varied between individuals. It is suggested that this may be a function of non-standardised presentation of human factors information in air accident reports, coupled with non­ standardised interpretations of ambiguities in the model. On the basis of the inferential interpretation of the data, two main areas of discussion arise. The first is concerned with 'ambiguities': the structural characteristics of the Surry Model that influenced the fall of data onto the twelve error types. It became apparent that the typical sequence of events in aircrashes differed from the temporal sequence depicted by the model, and that assumptions made in the model about the configuration of the pilot- aircraft interface were inaccurate. Accordingly, modifications to the model are proposed. The second area of discussion is centred on 'antidotes': corrections for pilot errors identified as causal in aircrashes. The results indicate that some aspects of in-flight behaviour could be targeted for intervention. It is suggested that it may be useful to encourage pilots to engage in active information search from external sources in order to ensure that they supplement information available from the aviation system. Self-monitoring before flight may induce voluntary self removal from aviation activities. It is possible that some pilots may abstain from flight if they become aware that their performance has become impaired as a result of their physical or emotional condition. It is also suggested that risk communication techniques could facilitate the development of worst case thinking by pilots who are confronted by potential hazards. Rather than a more traditional emphasis on the implementation of strategies after contact with danger, these antidotes may encourage the active avoidance of danger.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    New Zealand's military aircraft purchases, 1957 - 1981 : from the Canberra to the Boeing 727 : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History at Massey University
    (Massey University, 2002) Bartleet, Michael
    This thesis will examine the factors that influenced New Zealand's military aircraft purchasing decisions between 1957 and 1981. This larger question gives rise to two lines of enquiry. Firstly, why did the New Zealand Government chose to equip particular roles? Secondly, why were the various aircraft types then chosen to fulfill these roles? This period encompasses the purchase of the Canberra, which was a significant episode in the history of the RNZAF's combat wing. It also includes the crucial re-equipment programme of the 1960s. The period ends with the purchase of the 727s, which was part of the adaptation to new defence commitments While a number of authors have commented on individual purchasing decisions, some have considered broader issues involved in military aircraft purchases. Foremost amongst these was David Filer, whose work dealt with the RNZAF during the period from 1946 to 1972. He stated that the most significant development in the RNZAF during the 1946-72 period was the selection the United States as a source of new aircraft. 1 David Filer, 'The New Zealand Armed Services: Their Development in Relation to Defence Policy', MA Thesis in Political Science, University of Canterbury 1979, p.110. This was in contrast to the early post-war period when New Zealand had chosen to purchase from Britain. He suggested that the change towards American purchases was part of the Air Force's response to the general defence trend in the period away from ties with the United Kingdom and towards ties with the United States and Australia. 2 ibid However, he acknowledged American dominance in military aircraft production and their willingness to provide credit facilities. Filer concluded that the RNZAF was altered more by this move from defence ties with Britain towards ties with the United States and Australia than by the switch from commitments in the Middle East to South-East Asia. 3 ibid., p.112 [From Introduction]
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Cleared to disconnect? : a study of the interaction between airline pilots and line maintenance engineers : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Aviation at Massey University, Manawatũ, New Zealand
    (Massey University, 2016) Fisher, Tahlia Jane
    Accurate information regarding the maintenance status of an aircraft is essential for safe and efficient airline operations, yet there is evidence to suggest that pilots and line maintenance engineers do not always communicate effectively with each other. To date the majority of this evidence has been anecdotal, and formal studies have focused primarily on the shortcomings of the aircraft logbook as a communication medium. Despite the notion that poor communication between these two groups can potentially have undesirable consequences, there has been little discussion about how this might manifest within an airline environment. The studies undertaken for this research examined three distinct aspects of the pilot-maintenance interface: 1) the intergroup relationship between airline pilots and line maintenance engineers, 2) operational radio communications between airline pilots and line maintenance engineers, and 3) the effects of deficient pilot-maintenance communication on aircraft operations and flight safety. Thematically analysed discourse from a series of focus groups held at a large New Zealand airline, found that communication difficulties are primarily the result of an interrelating set of organisational, physical and psychosocial barriers, all of which influence the nature of the intergroup relationship between pilots and line maintenance engineers. The use of Interaction Process Analysis (IPA) to examine radio calls between pilots and maintenance personnel identified that while the two groups share similar communication patterns and styles, indications of these barriers were present within their communication exchanges. The effects of deficient communication were then examined using data from the United States Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS). Using Correspondence Analysis (CA) to map associations between deficient pilot-maintenance communication and adverse outcomes, evidence was found that poor communication can be associated with both schedule disruptions and potential safety ramifications. Ultimately, this research has important implications for airlines, particularly given the degree to which organisational factors can influence the efficacy of communication between these two groups. In light of the findings which suggest that problematic interactions between pilots and maintenance personnel can have both commercial implications and pose a threat to flight safety, it is recommended that airlines give consideration to facilitating joint Crew Resource Management (CRM) training for these two groups.