Massey Documents by Type
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/294
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item An evaluation of the ecology and riparian management of the south branch of the Whareroa Stream, Paekakariki : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Science in Natural Resource Management at Massey University(Massey University, 2008) Palmer, Karen ThelmaWhareroa Farm, Mackays Crossing, Paekakariki, was bought by the Department of Conservation in 2005. The goal was to effect the restoration of a corridor for flora and fauna from the Akatarawa Forest in the east to Queen Elizabeth Park and the sea in the west. The south branch of the Whareroa Stream, which arises as a series of tributaries from a ridge 272m above sea level, traverses Whareroa Farm and the adjacent Queen Elizabeth Park. It was thought likely that the stream had been severely affected ecologically during a century of cattle and sheep farming, though the degree to which the ecological degradation had occurred was unknown. Obvious deforestation and land use changes suggested that, in concert with many other New Zealand hill country farms, the ecological changes would be significant. To establish and quantify the degree of degradation, the Auckland Regional Council (ARC) Stream Environment Valuation (SEV) protocol was applied to the Whareroa Stream and its tributaries. Five sites were selected for valuation, varying from open pasture to bush covered and open parkland. The resulting SEV scores showed losses of ecological value ranging from 32% to 46% across the sites. The Macroinvertebrate Community Index (MCI) and the fish Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) were measured at each site. Results indicated that aquatic habitats were unable to sustain adequate assemblages at four of the five sites. The valuations of the riparian zones at each site used the River Environment Classification (REC) and Riparian Management Classification (RMC) protocols. The results indicated that current riparian characteristics showed poor to absent effective riparian zones from the headwaters to the sea at all sites. Riparian zones are pivotal to the provision of stream ecological integrity and are responsible for maintaining the longitudinal, lateral and vertical connectivity between a stream, its network and its surrounding land. The loss of in-stream organic matter from lack of riparian vegetation together with the loss of effective temperature control from lack of shade, impacts negatively on the habitats for macroinvertebrates and fish. This was highlighted in the Whareroa Stream network. While the SEV and RMC evaluations showed that, with best practice management plans, there was great potential for improvement of the Whareroa Stream ecology, any riparian restoration would require sympathetic and improved fencing, withdrawal of stock from stream access and the retirement of headwater land from pastoral use. The loss of ecological integrity that occurs as a result of prolonged land use changes from forest to agriculture is well illustrated by the situation in the south branch of the Whareroa Stream and its tributaries.Item Cost benefit analysis of riparian planting options for freshwater coastal streams in Horowhenua : ngā utu kia piki te Mauri o ngā wai a Parawhenuamea : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Environmental Management, Massey University, Manawatū, New Zealand(Massey University, 2014) Tangatatai, TeneFreshwater ecosystem health is an important policy priority in New Zealand, recently highlighted by the government’s launch of the ‘Freshwater Reform 2013’. One practical way of improving freshwater ecosystem health is riparian planting. In this context, the aim was to develop and apply a cost benefit analysis (CBA) methodology to evaluate riparian planting options for restoring five freshwater coastal streams of importance to iwi/hapu in the Horowhenua, drawing on two distinct disciplines – freshwater ecology and economics. Essential to this CBA methodology was an explicit evaluation of a desired policy outcome. Accordingly, attention was given to assessing what constitutes the desired policy outcome that is ‘freshwater ecosystem health of coastal streams’. This assessment was based on developing a detailed understanding of the attributes that must managed to achieve ‘freshwater ecosystem health’ including: in-stream temperature, periphyton, sediment, water flows, ecological connectivity, nitrate and ammonia, key fish species and stream invertebrates. The CBA methodology then focused on developing a new systems framework (interrelated ecosystem ‘biophysical structures’, ‘processes’ and ‘functions’) for assessing the ecological role of riparian vegetation in improving freshwater ecosystem health. Non-market economic values required for CBA calculations were then derived using a benefit transfer method. Data from three study sites (Karapiro South Waikato, Hurunui Canterbury, and Canterbury) based on ‘choice experiment’ values were evaluated for their suitability for use in the policy site (Horowhenua). The suitability of data from study sites for use in the policy site applied the Welch T test and Wilcoxon rank sum, using ‘personal income’ as the assessment criterion. Over 100 hundred planting scenarios were then tested by CBA, with almost all having positive net present values for both 5m and 10m width planting options. The study concludes with a discussion of the practical and policy implications of these findings, and highlights the limitations of this study and how these can be overcome in future research. Keywords: Indigenous, ecosystem health, freshwater coastal streams, riparian, environmental cost benefit analysis, benefit transfer.
