Massey Documents by Type

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/294

Browse

Filters

20211

Settings

Subject: search.filters.subject.Spark

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Scalable, high-performance, and generalized subtree data anonymization approach for Apache Spark
    (MDPI (Basel, Switzerland), 2021-03-03) Bazai SU; Jang-Jaccard J; Alavizadeh H; Guitart J
    Data anonymization strategies such as subtree generalization have been hailed as techniques that provide a more efficient generalization strategy compared to full-tree generalization counterparts. Many subtree-based generalizations strategies (e.g., top-down, bottom-up, and hybrid) have been implemented on the MapReduce platform to take advantage of scalability and parallelism. However, MapReduce inherent lack support for iteration intensive algorithm implementation such as subtree generalization. This paper proposes Distributed Dataset (RDD)-based implementation for a subtree-based data anonymization technique for Apache Spark to address the issues associated with MapReduce-based counterparts. We describe our RDDs-based approach that offers effective partition management, improved memory usage that uses cache for frequently referenced intermediate values, and enhanced iteration support. Our experimental results provide high performance compared to the existing state-of-the-art privacy preserving approaches and ensure data utility and privacy levels required for any competitive data anonymization techniques.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A comprehensive performance analysis of Apache Hadoop and Apache Spark for large scale data sets using HiBench
    (BioMed Central Ltd, 14/12/2020) Ahmed N; Barczak ALC; Susnjak T; Rashid MA
    Big Data analytics for storing, processing, and analyzing large-scale datasets has become an essential tool for the industry. The advent of distributed computing frameworks such as Hadoop and Spark offers efficient solutions to analyze vast amounts of data. Due to the application programming interface (API) availability and its performance, Spark becomes very popular, even more popular than the MapReduce framework. Both these frameworks have more than 150 parameters, and the combination of these parameters has a massive impact on cluster performance. The default system parameters help the system administrator deploy their system applications without much effort, and they can measure their specific cluster performance with factory-set parameters. However, an open question remains: can new parameter selection improve cluster performance for large datasets? In this regard, this study investigates the most impacting parameters, under resource utilization, input splits, and shuffle, to compare the performance between Hadoop and Spark, using an implemented cluster in our laboratory. We used a trial-and-error approach for tuning these parameters based on a large number of experiments. In order to evaluate the frameworks of comparative analysis, we select two workloads: WordCount and TeraSort. The performance metrics are carried out based on three criteria: execution time, throughput, and speedup. Our experimental results revealed that both system performances heavily depends on input data size and correct parameter selection. The analysis of the results shows that Spark has better performance as compared to Hadoop when data sets are small, achieving up to two times speedup in WordCount workloads and up to 14 times in TeraSort workloads when default parameter values are reconfigured.