Massey Documents by Type

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/294

Browse

Filters

2017 - 201912020 - 20241

Settings

Subject: search.filters.subject.exposure

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Alcohol marketing on social media: young people’s exposure, engagement and alcohol-related behaviors
    (Taylor and Francis Group, 2024-07-08) McCreanor T; Moewaka Barnes A; Goodwin I; Carah N; Young J; Spicer J; Lyons AC
    Aim Alcohol promotions in conventional channels are associated with subsequent alcohol consumption in young people, but little is known about young people’s exposure to digital alcohol marketing. This exploratory study investigated young people’s exposure to, and engagement with, alcohol marketing on social media platforms, variations across sociodemographic groups and associations with alcohol-related behaviors. Method An online survey was conducted with 3698 participants aged between 14 and 20 years (M = 17.1; SD = 1.8) in New Zealand. The survey asked about social media use and exposure to and engagement with alcohol product marketing on their preferred platforms, alcohol consumption patterns, hazardous drinking (AUDIT-C scores) and purchasing alcohol online. Results Nearly three-quarters of the sample who responded to questions about exposure to alcohol marketing (70.6%; n = 1541) reported seeing marketing on at least one social media platform, with older respondents (18–20 years) more likely to report exposure than younger respondents (14–17 years); no differences were found across gender, ethnicity or socioeconomic groups. Over one-third of those who responded to questions about engagement (40.7%; n = 850) reported engaging with alcohol marketing and this varied by age, gender and ethnicity. Recall of exposure to alcohol marketing was less strongly associated with online purchase and having ever drunk alcohol than was engagement with alcohol marketing, which was also associated with hazardous drinking. Conclusions Engagement with alcohol marketing was more strongly related to alcohol behaviors, including online purchasing, having ever drunk alcohol, and drinking at hazardous levels, than exposure. These findings also demonstrated inequitable patterns of engagement with alcohol marketing on social media associated with these novel algorithmic marketing methods.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Wood Dust in Joineries and Furniture Manufacturing: An Exposure Determinant and Intervention Study.
    (1/05/2017) Douwes J; Cheung K; Prezant B; Sharp M; Corbin M; McLean D; 't Mannetje A; Schlunssen V; Sigsgaard T; Kromhout H; LaMontagne AD; Pearce N; McGlothlin JD
    OBJECTIVES: To assess wood dust exposures and determinants in joineries and furniture manufacturing and to evaluate the efficacy of specific interventions on dust emissions under laboratory conditions. Also, in a subsequent follow-up study in a small sample of joinery workshops, we aimed to develop, implement, and evaluate a cost-effective and practicable intervention to reduce dust exposures. METHODS: Personal inhalable dust (n = 201) was measured in 99 workers from 10 joineries and 3 furniture-making factories. To assess exposure determinants, full-shift video exposure monitoring (VEM) was conducted in 19 workers and task-based VEM in 32 workers (in 7 joineries and 3 furniture factories). We assessed the efficacy of vacuum extraction on hand tools and the use of vacuum cleaners instead of sweeping and dry wiping under laboratory conditions. These measures were subsequently implemented in three joinery workshops with 'high' (>4 mg m-3) and one with 'low' (<2 mg m-3) baseline exposures. We also included two control workshops (one 'low' and one 'high' exposure workshop) in which no interventions were implemented. Exposures were measured 4 months prior and 4 months following the intervention. RESULTS: Average (geometric means) exposures in joinery and furniture making were 2.5 mg m-3 [geometric standard deviations (GSD) 2.5] and 0.6 mg m-3 (GSD 2.3), respectively. In joinery workers cleaning was associated with a 3.0-fold higher (P < 0.001) dust concentration compared to low exposure tasks (e.g. gluing), while the use of hand tools showed 3.0- to 11.0-fold higher (P < 0.001) exposures. In furniture makers, we found a 5.4-fold higher exposure (P < 0.001) with using a table/circular saw. Laboratory efficiency experiments showed a 10-fold decrease in exposure (P < 0.001) when using a vacuum cleaner. Vacuum extraction on hand tools combined with a downdraft table reduced exposures by 42.5% for routing (P < 0.1) and 85.5% for orbital sanding (P < 0.001). Following intervention measures in joineries, a borderline statistically significant (P < 0.10) reduction in exposure of 30% was found in workshops with 'high' baseline exposures, but no reduction was shown in the workshop with 'low' baseline exposures. CONCLUSIONS: Wood dust exposure is high in joinery workers and (to a lesser extent) furniture makers with frequent use of hand tools and cleaning being key drivers of exposure. Vacuum extraction on hand tools and alternative cleaning methods reduced workplace exposures substantially, but may be insufficient to achieve compliance with current occupational exposure limits.