Massey Documents by Type
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/294
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item Comparison of maize silage and traditional forage crops in New Zealand : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Plant Science at Massey University, Manawatū Campus, New Zealand(Massey University, 2022) Thant, Aung MyoCattle wintering systems using crops including grazing kale, swede, and fodder beet crops in situ have resulted in soil and water quality deterioration. Nitrate leaching is the most common problem due to the high deposition of urine N driven by excess N intake. Alternative cropping systems offer a potential solution to reduce these environmental problems while maintaining or maximising productivity. We proposed maize silage as an alternative crop because it has high yield potential, flexible feeding requirements, compliments the nutritive value of pasture, and is potentially suitable for more regions in New Zealand in the future due to climate change. However, research needs to determine whether maize silage yield, feed quality and potential nitrate losses during production and utilisation means it is a viable alternative to in situ grazed forage crops in these areas. Field experiments were conducted at Massey University, Tokoroa and Kiwitea to determine forage yield and feed quality, management effects and site differences in 2018/19 and 2019/20. Crop yields and forage N content were utilised to simulate urine N loads from the feeding of these forage crops. The excreted N loads were analysed in APSIM (Agricultural Production Systems sIMulator) to predict nitrate leaching losses. Maize produced significantly higher yields compared with the winter forage crops at all Massey University trials while producing competitive yields at Tokoroa and Kiwitea. Yields ranged from 10,940 to 30,417 kg DM/ha for maize whilst wide and lower yield ranges were observed for the winter forage crops (4,579 to 22,928 kg DM/ha). Irrigation increased yields of forage crops by 29-63%. Similarly, nitrogen fertiliser increased yield by 30%, on average. The faster canopy development of maize has the advantage of intercepting more radiation in summer and suppressing weeds, contributing to greater growth and yield despite a shorter crop season. All forage crops produced forage with good metabolisable energy content (MJ/kg DM); higher values in swede (10.1-14.5) and fodder beet (10.8-14.9) whereas intermediate values in kale (8.9-12.7) and maize (9.9-12.2). However, maize was the highest energy-yielding crop, ranging from about 200-316 GJ/ha while other crops varied from 34 to 217 GJ/ha. Protein content in kale (7.5-16.6% DM) and swede (11.4-18.2% DM) were adequate for non-lactating cows whereas maize (5.4-9.2% DM) and fodder beet (7.6-11.2% DM) were lower than recommended protein levels for dairy cows but offering an opportunity to reduce urinary N excretion. Maize also had recommended fibre content. With higher sugar contents, swede and fodder beet were poor in fibre sources, potentially prone to rumen acidosis unless considered mixed diet with high fibre feed. APSIM modelling indicated that maize would produce the lowest urine N output while swede the highest in simulated feeding. Accordingly, N loads/ha was higher for winter forage crops especially when good yields were produced. When common feeding practices were considered, i.e., off-paddock maize feeding (no urine N deposition) and on-paddock grazing of winter forage crops (high urine N deposition), simulated nitrate losses from maize cropping systems were the lowest. Predicted nitrate losses were 21 and 32 kg N/ha for maize under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions. A ryegrass cover crop further reduced simulated nitrate losses by 20-30%. Predicted nitrate losses for fodder beet, kale, and swede crops were 126, 162, 154 kg N/ha under irrigated conditions and 72, 201, 199 kg N/ha under non-irrigated conditions, respectively in grazing systems.Item The effect of planting date on maize: Silage yield, starch content and leaf area(2014) Tsimba, R; Edmeades, GO; Millner, JP; Kemp, PD; Morris, NJFour field experiments were established in the Waikato and Manawatu regions over two years to determine planting date (PD) influence on growth, silage yield (SY) and starch content of seven maize (Zea mays) hybrids. Silage yield response to PD was best described using quadratic regression models. The PD at which silage yield was maximised (optimum PD) was later in the cooler, high latitude environment of Manawatu (23 October) than the more northerly locations in Waikato (9-15 October). In both regions, planting 2 or 3 weeks either side of the optimum PD reduced SY by <5%. In Waikato, the optimum PD in a warmer than average spring (+1°C) was 1-2 weeks earlier. Under non-limiting moisture conditions later planting reduced yields in both Waikato (24.22 versus 21.06 t/ha) and Manawatu (30.09 versus 22.50 t/ha). This was attributed to decreased temperatures (<15°C) and radiation (<17 MJ/m2 /d) during grain filling. Due to more rapid reductions in autumn temperature and radiation in Manawatu, yield decline beyond the optimum PD was greater (-183 kg/ha/d (0.6%), R 2 =0.81) than Waikato (-50 to -85 kg/ha/d (0.3%), R 2 ≥0.67). Starch content was highest for plantings before 6 November, dropping thereafter with harvest index. Highest maximum leaf area index was observed at mean daily temperatures of 17-19°C.

