Should the law allow sentiment to triumph over science? The retention of body parts
| dc.contributor.author | Thomas, C. M. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2011-07-29T02:24:02Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2011-07-29T02:24:02Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2002 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The use of human body material including tissue and organs has been controversial for many centuries. Concerns arose in the eighteenth century about practices used to obtain corpses for dissection. Scientific studies in biotechnology have placed increased value on the body as a source of research material. At the same time there is now a greater emphasis on individual autonomy. Disputes reflect the striking differences between scientific or utilitarian perspectives and the body’s social meaning. This paper considers issues that have arisen in several countries relating to the use of body parts and considers whether the law in New Zealand is sufficient to prevent such problems from arising in New Zealand. The conclusion is that present legal structures are insufficient to keep pace with technological advances. If biotechnology is to advance, it is essential to address the issues of consent while respecting cultural and religious views of the need for respect for the human body. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10179/2555 | |
| dc.subject | Organ transplants | en_US |
| dc.subject | Organ donation | en_US |
| dc.subject | Organ supply | en_US |
| dc.subject | Ethics | en_US |
| dc.title | Should the law allow sentiment to triumph over science? The retention of body parts | en_US |
| dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |