Word embedding evaluation for Sinhala

dc.contributor.authorLakmal D
dc.contributor.authorRanathunga S
dc.contributor.authorPeramuna S
dc.contributor.authorHerath I
dc.contributor.editorCalzolari N
dc.contributor.editorBéchet F
dc.contributor.editorBlache P
dc.contributor.editorChoukri K
dc.contributor.editorCieri C
dc.contributor.editorDeclerck T
dc.contributor.editorGoggi S
dc.contributor.editorIsahara H
dc.contributor.editorMaegaard B
dc.contributor.editorMariani J
dc.contributor.editorMazo H
dc.contributor.editorMoreno A
dc.contributor.editorOdijk J
dc.contributor.editorPiperidis S
dc.coverage.spatialMarseille, France
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-08T02:29:42Z
dc.date.available2025-07-08T02:29:42Z
dc.date.finish-date2020-05-16
dc.date.issued2020-01-01
dc.date.start-date2020-05-11
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents the first ever comprehensive evaluation of different types of word embeddings for Sinhala language. Three standard word embedding models, namely, Word2Vec (both Skipgram and CBOW), FastText, and Glove are evaluated under two types of evaluation methods: intrinsic evaluation and extrinsic evaluation. Word analogy and word relatedness evaluations were performed in terms of intrinsic evaluation, while sentiment analysis and part-of-speech (POS) tagging were conducted as the extrinsic evaluation tasks. Benchmark datasets used for intrinsic evaluations were carefully crafted considering specific linguistic features of Sinhala. In general, FastText word embeddings with 300 dimensions reported the finest accuracies across all the evaluation tasks, while Glove reported the lowest results.
dc.description.confidentialfalse
dc.format.pagination1874-1881
dc.identifier.citationLakmal D, Ranathunga S, Peramuna S, Herath I. (2020). Word embedding evaluation for Sinhala. Calzolari N, Béchet F, Blache P, Choukri K, Cieri C, Declerck T, Goggi S, Isahara H, Maegaard B, Mariani J, Mazo H, Moreno A, Odijk J, Piperidis S. Lrec 2020 12th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation Conference Proceedings. (pp. 1874-1881). European Language Resources Association.
dc.identifier.elements-typec-conference-paper-in-proceedings
dc.identifier.isbn979-10-95546-34-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/73165
dc.publisherEuropean Language Resources Association
dc.publisher.urihttp://aclanthology.org/2020.lrec-1.231/
dc.rights© European Language Resources Association (ELRA)
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.source.journalLrec 2020 12th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation Conference Proceedings
dc.source.name-of-conferenceTwelfth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference
dc.subjectWord Embedding
dc.subjectSinhala
dc.subjectEvaluation Methodologies
dc.titleWord embedding evaluation for Sinhala
dc.typeconference
pubs.elements-id488654
pubs.organisational-groupOther

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
488654 PDF.pdf
Size:
353.29 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version.pdf

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
9.22 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: