Browsing by Author "Günther CS"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Concentrations of Plasma Amino Acids and Neurotransmitters in Participants with Functional Gut Disorders and Healthy Controls
    (MDPI (Basel, Switzerland), 2023-02-20) James SC; Fraser K; Cooney J; Günther CS; Young W; Gearry RB; Heenan PE; Trower T; Keenan JI; Talley NJ; McNabb WC; Roy NC; Jang C
    Amino acids are important in several biochemical pathways as precursors to neurotransmitters which impact biological processes previously linked to functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs). Dietary protein consumption, metabolic host processes, and the gut microbiome can influence the plasma concentration of amino acids and neurotransmitters, and their uptake by tissues. The aim of this analysis was to quantify 19 proteogenic and 4 non-proteogenic amino acids and 19 neurotransmitters (including precursors and catabolites, herein referred to as neurotransmitters) to ascertain if their circulating concentrations differed between healthy participants and those with FGIDs. Plasma proteogenic and non-proteogenic amino acids and neurotransmitters were measured using ultra-performance liquid chromatography and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, respectively, from 165 participants (Rome IV: irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-constipation, IBS-diarrhea), functional constipation, functional diarrhea, and healthy controls). There were significant differences (p < 0.05) in pairwise comparisons between healthy controls and specific FGID groups for branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs), ornithine, and alpha-aminobutyric acid. No other significant differences were observed for the neurotransmitters or any other amino acids analyzed. Multivariate and bivariate correlation analyses between proteogenic and non-proteogenic amino acids and neurotransmitters for constipation (constipation (IBS-C and functional constipation) and phenotypes diarrhea (IBS-D and functional diarrhea)) and healthy controls suggested that associations between BCAAs, 5-hydroxytryptophan, and kynurenine in combination with tyrosine, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine, and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid and associations with gamma-aminobutyric acid, glutamate, asparagine, and serine are likely disrupted in FGID phenotypes. In conclusion, although correlations were evident between some proteogenic and non-proteogenic amino acids and neurotransmitters, the results showed minor concentration differences in plasma proteogenic and non-proteogenic amino acids, amino acid-derived metabolites, and neurotransmitters between FGID phenotypes and healthy controls.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Effects of defatted rice bran-fortified bread on gut microbiome, cardiovascular risk, gut discomfort, wellbeing and gut physiology in healthy adults with low dietary fibre intake
    (Elsevier Ltd on behalf of the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, 2025-06) Ng HM; Maggo J; Wall CL; Bayer SB; Mullaney JA; Cabrera D; Fraser K; Cooney JM; Günther CS; McNabb WC; Foster M; Frampton C; Gearry RB; Roy NC
    Background & aims: Inadequate dietary fibre (DF) intake is associated with suboptimal gut function and increased risk of several human diseases. Bread is commonly consumed and is ideal to incorporate cereal bran to increase DF content. No human studies have investigated the effects of defatted rice bran (DRB) in bread, which has triple the DF of white bread, purported hypo-allergenicity and a unique nutrient profile, as a dietary intervention in healthy adults. This study aims to assess the relative abundances of a composite of key faecal microbial genera and species involved in DF fermentation and metabolism following the habitual intake of DRB-fortified bread and its influence on other biological markers of host and microbial interactions, cardiovascular risk profile, patient-reported outcomes, total DF intake, and gut physiology in healthy adults with low baseline DF intake. Methods: Fifty-six healthy adults with low baseline DF intake (<18 g/day (females), <22 g/day (males)) completed a two-arm, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised, crossover study. Participants consumed three (females) or four (males) slices of DRB-fortified bread or control bread daily as part of their usual diet for four weeks, with the intervention periods separated by a two-week washout. Outcomes included faecal microbiota composite (primary outcome); relative abundances (taxa and gene); faecal moisture content and bile acid concentrations; plasma and faecal organic acid concentrations; cardiovascular risk profile; gut comfort, psychological wellbeing parameters; total DF intake; whole gut transit time, and were measured at baseline and following each intervention phase. Additionally, in a sub-study, 15 participants ingested gas-sensing capsules to assess whole and regional gut transit times, and total and regional colonic hydrogen and carbon dioxide concentrations at the same timepoints. Results: DRB-fortified bread consumption significantly increased total DF intake from 20.7 g/day to 43.4 g/day (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the primary outcome, microbial taxa composite within and between groups (False Discovery Rate (FDR) correction, p > 0.10). As compared to control, the DRB group had increased relative abundances of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (unadjusted p = 0.04), Bifidobacterium longum (unadjusted p = 0.12), and Bacteroides ovatus (unadjusted p = 0.10); lower relative abundances in Coprococcus genus (unadjusted p = 0.09), Roseburia faecis (unadjusted p = 0.02) and Prevotella copri species (unadjusted p = 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed in the relative abundances of these taxa within and between groups (FDR correction p > 0.10) and for most of the other outcomes between groups (p > 0.05). Only mean serum high-density lipoprotein (HDL) concentrations significantly increased (p = 0.006), and mean total cholesterol (TC) to HDL concentration ratio significantly lowered (p = 0.02) in the DRB group compared to the control group. Conclusion: This is the first human study to show that a high-DF DRB-fortified bread improved DF intake, HDL cholesterol profiles, and may affect the gut microbiota composition in healthy adults with low DF intake. These findings support the substitution of white bread with DRB-fortified bread as an effective method to improve DF intake, which may have subsequent benefits on gut physiology and metabolic health.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Effects of Defatted Rice Bran-Fortified Bread on the Gut Microbiota Composition of Healthy Adults With Low Dietary Fiber Intake: Protocol for a Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial
    (JMIR Publications, 2024-08-29) Ng HM; Maggo J; Wall CL; Bayer SB; McNabb WC; Mullaney JA; Foster M; Cabrera DL; Fraser K; Cooney J; Trower T; Günther CS; Frampton C; Gearry RB; Roy NC
    BACKGROUND: Inadequate dietary fiber (DF) intake is associated with several human diseases. Bread is commonly consumed, and its DF content can be increased by incorporating defatted rice bran (DRB). OBJECTIVE: This first human study on DRB-fortified bread primarily aims to assess the effect of DRB-fortified bread on the relative abundance of a composite of key microbial genera and species in fecal samples. Secondary outcomes include clinical (cardiovascular risk profile), patient-reported (daily bread consumption and bowel movement, gut comfort, general well-being, and total DF intake), biological (fecal microbiota gene abundances, and fecal and plasma metabolites), and physiome (whole-gut and regional transit time and gas fermentation profiles) outcomes in healthy adults with low DF intake. METHODS: This is a 2-armed, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, crossover randomized controlled trial. The study duration is 14 weeks: 2 weeks of lead-in, 4 weeks of intervention per phase, 2 weeks of washout, and 2 weeks of follow-up. Overall, 60 healthy adults with low DF intake (<18 g [female individuals] or <22 g [male individuals] per day) were recruited in Christchurch, New Zealand, between June and December 2022. Randomly assigned participants consumed 3 (female individuals) or 4 (male individuals) slices of DRB-fortified bread per day and then placebo bread, and vice versa. The DRB-fortified bread provided 8 g (female individuals) or 10.6 g (male individuals) of total DF, whereas the placebo (a matched commercial white toast bread) provided 2.7 g (female individuals) or 3.6 g (male individuals) of total DF. Before and after each intervention phase, participants provided fecal and blood samples to assess biological responses; completed a 3-day food diary to assess usual intakes and web-based questionnaires to assess gut comfort, general and mental well-being, daily bread intake, and bowel movement via an app; underwent anthropometry and blood pressure measurements; and drank blue food dye to assess whole-gut transit time. Additionally, 25% (15/60) of the participants ingested Atmo gas-sensing capsules to assess colonic gas fermentation profile and whole-gut and regional transit time. Mean differences from baseline will be compared between the DRB and placebo groups, as well as within groups (after the intervention vs baseline). For metabolome analyses, comparisons will be made within and between groups using postintervention values. RESULTS: Preliminary analysis included 56 participants (n=33, 59% female; n=23, 41% male). Due to the large dataset, data analysis was planned to be fully completed by the last quarter of 2024, with full results expected to be published in peer-reviewed journals by the end of 2024. CONCLUSIONS: This first human study offers insights into the prospect of consuming DRB-fortified bread to effectively modulate health-promoting gut microbes, their metabolism, and DF intake in healthy adults with low DF intake. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12622000884707; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=383814. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/59227.