Browsing by Author "Manson L"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A Critical Tiriti Analysis of the New Zealand Disability Strategy 2016-2026
    (University of Hawai'i Center on Disability Studies, 2022-11-24) Came H; McCreanor T; Manson L
    Health policy is one mechanism to address inequities and protect Indigenous people’s access to the shared human right to health. Te Tiriti o Waitangi (the Māori text) negotiated between the British Crown and Māori (the Indigenous peoples of Aotearoa) outlines the social contract between Māori and Non-Māori. It was negotiated in part to protect Māori health. Within Aotearoa there continues to be significant ethnic inequities in disabilities. This paper undertakes a retrospective Critical Tiriti Analysis of the New Zealand Disability Strategy to determine its compliance with Te Tiriti. It also considers whether such an analysis might strengthen responsiveness to Indigenous peoples elsewhere. This analysis involved a five-phase process of review. Through our analysis we identified poor to fair engagement with the responsibilities outlined in Te Tiriti o Waitangi. There were promising statements about the special relationship between the Crown and Māori, conflicting statements about governance and self-determination, and limited engagement with ethnic specific equity concerns or spirituality. To strengthen the Strategy the authors determined Tāngata whaikaha (Māori disabled people’s) views needed to be more strongly centered within the structure and content. The historical and contemporary determinants of Māori health needed to be included along with deeper engagement with intersectionality and Te Tiriti o Waitangi responsibilities. Undertaking critical policy analysis is an effective method to inform and review policy that may be applicable in other settler-colonial contexts with significant ethnic health inequities.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Ethnic (pay) disparities in public sector leadership from 2001-2016 in Aotearoa New Zealand
    (Queensland University of Technology, 2020-08-21) Came H; Badu E; Ioane J; Manson L; McCreanor T
    New Zealand governments have longstanding policy commitments to equal employment practices. Little attention has been paid to ethnic pay disparities in recent years. Informed by a series of Official Information Act requests, we were interested to find out to what extent ethnic pay disparities existed at senior levels within the core public sector and district health boards (DHBs). We examined the number of employees who earned more than NZ$100,000 by determining the total full-time equivalent staff (FTEs) and the respective proportions of the three ethnicities compared- Māori, Pasifika and Other. The analyses revealed a pattern of ethnic pay disparities across the public sector over the period reviewed. There were fewer Māori and Pasifika staff employed in DHBs than their population proportion. The failure to promote Māori and Pasifika to the upper tiers of the public sector is consistent with definitions of institutional racism. The authors call for more research to understand the dynamics of ethnic pay disparity and the drivers of this disparity.