Massey Documents by Type

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/294

Browse

Filters

2024 - 20252

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Alpass FSubject: search.filters.subject.Public Health

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Public Health.
    (2024-12) Röhr S; Gibson R; Alpass F
    BACKGROUND: High purpose in life - the extent of engagement in activities that are personally valued and give a sense of direction and meaning to life - has been associated with higher cognitive functioning and may protect against dementia. Less is known about gender differences in cognitive functioning regarding purpose in life. Understanding gender-specific links can inform tailored interventions aimed at promoting cognitive health. METHOD: A subsample (n = 875, aged 50-85 years) of the NZHWR study completed face-to-face cognitive assessments and postal surveys in 2012. Cognitive functioning was assessed with Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R), adapted for culturally acceptable use in New Zealand. Purpose in life was measured with the Life Engagement Test. Linear regression analysis assessed associations of gender, purpose in life and their interaction with cognitive functioning, controlling for socioeconomic factors (age, age², education, ethnicity [Māori, Indigenous people of New Zealand, and Non-Māori, mostly of European descent], marital status, employment, individual-level economic hardship, area-based socioeconomic deprivation), lifestyle and health factors (smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, SF-12 physical and mental health, social engagement, social loneliness). RESULT: The analytical sample (n = 643) was M = 65.3 (SD = 7.4) years old; 53.3% women, 21.2% Māori. The ACE-R score was M = 92.9 (SD = 5.3). N = 55 (8.5%) scored ≥1.5SD below the mean, indicating cognitive impairment. Women had higher cognitive functioning (M = 93.7, SD = 4.6 vs. M = 92.0, SD = 5.8; Z = -3.88, p<.001) and purpose in life (M = 26.2, SD = 3.8 vs. M = 25.8, SD = 3.4; Z = -2.19, p = .029) than men. In the adjusted regression analysis (R² = 27.6%), higher purpose in life (B = 0.29, 95%CI = 0.12;0.46; p = .001) and female gender (B = 9.97, 95%CI = 4.71;15.24, p<.001) were associated with higher cognitive functioning. The association of purpose in life with cognitive functioning was less pronounced for women than men (B = -0.31, 95%CI = -0.51;-0.11; p = .003) (Fig. 1). Significant covariates included age², education, deprivation, and social loneliness. CONCLUSION: In this sample of older New Zealanders, a gender difference in cognitive functioning varied by level of purpose in life. Women had higher cognitive functioning than men, particularly at lower purpose in life, with the difference decreasing as purpose in life increases. Interventions to enhance purpose in life might particularly benefit men. Notably, cognitive functioning may also impact purpose in life, emphasising the need for longitudinal studies.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Area-based socioeconomic deprivation is associated with cognitive decline in midlife to early late-life New Zealanders without cognitive impairment
    (Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association, 2025-01-09) Röhr S; Gibson R; Alpass F
    Background Research identified individual-level socioeconomic factors as key determinants of cognitive health. This study investigated the effect of area-based socioeconomic deprivation on cognitive outcomes in midlife to early late-life New Zealanders without cognitive impairment. Understanding geographical dimensions of socioeconomic determinants of cognitive health is important from an equity perspective. Method Data stemmed from a subsample of the New Zealand Health, Work and Retirement Study, a cohort study on ageing. In 2010, 1,001 participants aged 49-84 years completed face-to-face interviews and were reassessed two years later. Cognitive functioning was measured using Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination–Revised, adapted for culturally acceptable use in New Zealand. Area-based socioeconomic deprivation was assessed using the New Zealand Deprivation Index (NZDep2006). Linear mixed-effects models analysed the association between area-based socioeconomic deprivation and cognitive outcomes, controlling for individual-level socioeconomic (age, age², gender, education, ethnicity [Māori, Indigenous people of New Zealand, and Non-Māori, mostly of European descent], marital status, employment, net personal income), lifestyle and health variables (Lifestyle for Brain Health/LIBRA index, social loneliness). Result The analysis included 783 participants (54.7% female, mean age 62.7 years, 25.0% Māori). Individuals with cognitive impairment at baseline (n = 69) and older than 75 years were excluded (n = 79). Further attrition was due to missing data. At baseline, 39.7% resided in low deprivation areas, 39.0% in moderate, and 21.3% in high deprivation areas. The unadjusted model indicated a significant association between higher area-based socioeconomic deprivation and lower cognitive functioning (B = -0.16, 95%CI: -0.22,-0.10; p < .001) and cognitive decline (B = -0.12, 95%CI: -0.21;-0.03; p = .015). The adjusted model yielded similar results for cognitive functioning (B = -0.08, 95%CI: -0.15;-0.01; p = .050) and cognitive decline (B = -0.12, 95%CI: -0.20;-0.04, p = .013) (Fig. 1). Influential covariates included gender, education, and lifestyle (LIBRA). Conclusion This study demonstrated a relationship between higher area-based socioeconomic deprivation and lower cognitive functioning, along with cognitive decline, in cognitively unimpaired New Zealanders aged 48 to 75 years. These findings emphasize the importance of considering neighbourhood characteristics and broader socioeconomic factors in strategies aimed at mitigating cognitive health disparities and reducing the impact of dementia in disadvantaged communities.