Massey Documents by Type

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/294

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Item
    Systematic Reanalysis of KMTNet Microlensing Events. II. Two New Planets in Giant-source Events
    (IOP Publishing on behalf of the American Astronomical Society., 2025-06-01) Yang H; Yee JC; Zhang J; Lee C-U; Kim D-J; Bond IA; Udalski A; Hwang K-H; Zang W; Qian Q; Gould A; Mao S; Albrow MD; Chung S-J; Han C; Jung YK; Ryu Y-H; Shin I-G; Shvartzvald Y; Cha S-M; Kim H-W; Kim S-L; Lee D-J; Lee Y; Park B-G; Pogge RW; Abe F; Bando K; Bennett DP; Bhattacharya A; Fukui A; Hamada R; Hamada S; Hamasaki N; Hirao Y; Silva SI; Itow Y; Koshimoto N; Matsubara Y; Miyazaki S; Muraki Y; Nagai T; Nunota K; Olmschenk G; Ranc C; Rattenbury NJ; Satoh Y; Sumi T; Suzuki D; Terry SK; Tristram PJ; Vandorou A; Yama H; Mróz P; Skowron J; Poleski R; Szymański MK; Soszyński I; Pietrukowicz P; Kozłowski S; Ulaczyk K; Rybicki KA; Iwanek P; Wrona M
    In this work, we continue to apply the updated KMTNet tender-love care photometric pipeline to historical microlensing events. We apply the pipeline to a subsample of events from the KMTNet database, which we refer to as the giant source sample. Leveraging the improved photometric data, we conduct a systematic search for anomalies within this sample. The search successfully uncovers four new planet-like anomalies and recovers two previously known planetary signals. After detailed analysis, two of the newly discovered anomalies are confirmed as clear planets: KMT-2019-BLG-0578 and KMT-2021-BLG-0736. Their planet-to-host mass ratios are q ∼ 4 × 10−3 and q ∼ 1 × 10−4, respectively. Another event, OGLE-2018-BLG-0421 (KMT-2018-BLG-0831), remains ambiguous. Both a stellar companion and a giant planet in the lens system could potentially explain the observed anomaly. The anomaly signal of the last event, MOA-2022-BLG-038 (KMT-2022-BLG-2342), is attributed to an extra source star. Within this sample, our procedure doubles the number of confirmed planets, demonstrating a significant enhancement in the survey sensitivity.
  • Item
    Systematic KMTNet Planetary Anomaly Search. II. Six New q < 2 × 10−4 Mass-ratio Planets
    (IOP Publishing on behalf of the American Astronomical Society, 2022-02-01) Hwang K-H; Zang W; Gould A; Udalski A; Bond IA; Yang H; Mao S; Albrow MD; Chung S-J; Han C; Jung YK; Ryu Y-H; Shin I-G; Shvartzvald Y; Yee JC; Cha S-M; Kim D-J; Kim H-W; Kim S-L; Lee C-U; Lee D-J; Lee Y; Park B-G; Pogge R; Mróz P; Poleski R; Skowron J; Szymański MK; Soszyński I; Pietrukowicz P; Kozłowski S; Ulaczyk K; Rybicki KA; Iwanek P; Wrona M; Gromadzki M; Abe F; Barry R; Bennett DP; Bhattacharya A; Fujii H; Fukui A; Hirao Y; Itow Y; Kirikawa R; Kondo I; Koshimoto N; Munford B; Matsubara Y; Miyazaki S; Muraki Y; Olmschenk G; Ranc C; Rattenbury NJ; Satoh YK; Shoji H; Silva SI; Sumi T; Suzuki D; Tristram PJ; Yonehara A; Zhang X; Zhu W; Penny MT; Fouqué P
    We apply the automated AnomalyFinder algorithm of Paper I to 2018-2019 light curves from the ≃13 deg2 covered by the six KMTNet prime fields, with cadences Γ ≥ 2 hr-1. We find a total of 11 planets with mass ratios q < 2 × 10-4, including 6 newly discovered planets, 1 planet that was reported in Paper I, and recovery of 4 previously discovered planets. One of the new planets, OGLE-2018-BLG-0977Lb, is in a planetary caustic event, while the other five (OGLE-2018-BLG-0506Lb, OGLE-2018-BLG-0516Lb, OGLE-2019-BLG-1492Lb, KMT-2019-BLG-0253, and KMT-2019-BLG-0953) are revealed by a "dip"in the light curve as the source crosses the host-planet axis on the opposite side of the planet. These subtle signals were missed in previous by-eye searches. The planet-host separations (scaled to the Einstein radius), s, and planet-host mass ratios, q, are, respectively, (s, q × 105) = (0.88, 4.1), (0.96 ± 0.10, 8.3), (0.94 ± 0.07, 13), (0.97 ± 0.07, 18), (0.97 ± 0.04, 4.1), and (0.74, 18), where the "± "indicates a discrete degeneracy. The 11 planets are spread out over the range . Together with the two planets previously reported with q ∼ 10-5 from the 2018-2019 nonprime KMT fields, this result suggests that planets toward the bottom of this mass-ratio range may be more common than previously believed.
  • Item
    KMT-2019-BLG-1715: Planetary microlensing event with three lens masses and two source stars
    (IOP Publishing on behalf of the American Astronomical Society, 2021-06-01) Han C; Udalski A; Kim D; Jung YK; Lee C-U; Bond IA; Albrow MD; Chung S-J; Gould A; Hwang K-H; Kim H-W; Ryu Y-H; Shin I-G; Shvartzvald Y; Zang W; Yee JC; Cha S-M; Kim D-J; Kim S-L; Lee D-J; Lee Y; Park B-G; Pogge RW; Kim C-H; Kim W-T; Mróz P; Szymański MK; Skowron J; Poleski R; Soszyński I; Pietrukowicz P; Kozłowski S; Ulaczyk K; Rybicki KA; Iwanek P; Wrona M; Gromadzki M; Abe F; Barry R; Bennett DP; Bhattacharya A; Donachie M; Fujii H; Fukui A; Itow Y; Hirao Y; Kirikawa R; Kondo I; Li MCA; Matsubara Y; Muraki Y; Miyazaki S; Ranc C; Rattenbury NJ; Satoh Y; Shoji H; Suematsu H; Sumi T; Suzuki D; Tanaka Y; Tristram PJ; Yamakawa T; Yamawaki T; Yonehara A
    We investigate the gravitational microlensing event KMT-2019-BLG-1715, the light curve of which shows two short-term anomalies from a caustic-crossing binary-lensing light curve: one with a large deviation and the other with a small deviation. We identify five pairs of solutions, in which the anomalies are explained by adding an extra lens or source component in addition to the base binary-lens model. We resolve the degeneracies by applying a method in which the measured flux ratio between the first and second source stars is compared with the flux ratio deduced from the ratio of the source radii. Applying this method leaves a single pair of viable solutions, in both of which the major anomaly is generated by a planetary-mass third body of the lens, and the minor anomaly is generated by a faint second source. A Bayesian analysis indicates that the lens comprises three masses: a planet-mass object with ∼2.6 MJ and binary stars of K and M dwarfs lying in the galactic disk. We point out the possibility that the lens is the blend, and this can be verified by conducting high-resolution follow-up imaging for the resolution of the lens from the source.