Massey Documents by Type
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/294
Browse
4 results
Search Results
Item Improving the response to synchronisation programmes of dairy cattle : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Veterinary Science at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand(Massey University, 2014) Sahu, Santosh KumarA gonadotrophin, prostaglandin, gonadotrophin + progesterone (GPG+P4) programme with fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) is the current recommended synchronisation programme for both heifers and anoestrous cows on New Zealand dairy farms. However, it is an expensive programme and a better understanding of the role of all of its components would be very useful in developing alternative cheaper programmes. The two components of the programme that are the least understood, in terms of their underlying physiological actions and how they influence the outcome of synchronisation, are the Day 0 gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) injection and the progesterone device. Additionally it is well known that energy status has a significant impact on fertility but there is little evidence, particularly under New Zealand conditions, of how energy status affects the response to GPG-based treatments in anoestrous postpartum dairy cows. The effects of a GPG (Day 0: 100 µg GnRH, Day 7: 500 µg PGF2a, Day 9: 100 µg GnRH) programme upon follicular and luteal dynamics, ovulation synchronisation and patterns of oestradiol and progesterone secretion in postpartum anoestrous dairy cows and nulliparous dairy heifers were compared with (i) a GPG programme plus a progesterone insert from Days 0–7 (GPG+P4) and (ii) a GPG+P4 programme from which the first GnRH treatment had been omitted (P+G+P4). Interactions of each treatment with energy balance, as determined by NEFA, IGF-I and insulin concentrations, were also studied in postpartum anoestrus cattle. Finally the conception rate (CR) to fixed time AI of a GPG+P4 programme in which AI was done concurrent with the Day 9 GnRH injection (Cosynch) was compared with a progesterone + prostaglandin programme (P4+PG; Day 0–7: progesterone releasing intravaginal device, morning of Day 6: 500 µg PGF2a, afternoon of Day 9: FTAI) in heifers. The physiological effects of the GPG and the GPG+P4 programmes were similar in anoestrous dairy cows. The inclusion of the Day 0 GnRH still appeared feasible in a GPG programme for treating anoestrous cows as it led to a higher probability of a corpus luteum (CL) on Day 7. In addition, treatment response was significantly affected by the postpartum duration and negative energy balance as evidenced by the significantly higher NEFA concentrations on Days 0, 7 and 9, and a lower insulin concentration on Day 0, in cows that failed to ovulate in response to the synchronisation protocol compared with cows that did ovulate. A clear and significant relationship between NEFA concentrations and ovulation in response to all synchronisation protocols showed that, regardless of the regimen that was used to treat anoestrus, the response was moderated and limited by the degree of negative energy balance. In heifers, the removal of the progesterone-releasing device from a GPG+P4 programme had no effect on follicular dynamics or on the proportion of heifers which ovulated after either the GnRH injection on Day 0 or Day 9. Additionally, unlike the anoestrus cows, omitting the GnRH injection on Day 0 did not result in significantly delayed ovulation at the end of the programme, inasmuch as treatment with P+G+P4 was associated with earlier ovulation than GPG. Furthermore, synchronising heifers with a significantly less expensive programme (P4+PG) resulted in similar CR to synchronising with GPG+P4 (54.8% versus 52.4%, respectively) further confirming that Day 0 GnRH was not essential in heifer synchrony. In conclusion, the higher conception rate in cows treated with a GPG+P4 programme rather than a GPG programme reported previously does not seem to be modulated by the actions on follicular dynamics and improved synchronised ovulation in dairy cattle with postpartum anoestrous (or in nulliparous heifers); however, the treatment response in anoestrous cows can be significantly affected by negative energy balance. In contrast, in dairy heifers, no benefit of Day 0 GnRH or the progesterone device in a GPG+P4 programme suggests the possibility of more cost effective options (e.g. P4+PG) which can lead to a CR as high as those synchronised using a GPG+P4 programme.Item Synchronization of follicular development, oestrus and ovulation using oestradiol benzoate and progesterone in dairy cattle : a thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy (Veterinary Clinical Science) at Massey University(Massey University, 2000) Abdullah, PuniminThe aim of oestrus synchronisation in cattle is to achieve a close synchrony of oestrus and ovulation with high submission rates. The status of follicular wave development at the time of treatment has been responsible for a large portion of the variability in ovarian response to treatments employed. The control of oestrus and ovulation require firstly that the life span of the corpus luteum is reduced, and secondly that follicular wave emergence is synchronized so that a healthy, oestrogen active dominant follicle is present at the end of the treatment. A clinical trial was conducted to determine the effective dosage of oestradiol bezoate in combination with progesterone on follicular dynamics, oestrous behaviour and time of ovulation when treatment was administered intravaginally. Intravaginal treatment with 2 mg or 7 mg oestradiol benzoate and progesterone on day 3 of the oestrous cycle was effective in inducing atresia of the dominant follicle and a new cohort of follicles began to emerge, on average, 2.5 ± 0.93 days after treatment. However, the IBD Onsettl2TM drug adminstration device, failed to maintain the required progesterone output and plasma concentrations during the treatment period. This resulted in failure to synchronize oestrus and ovulation. IBD Onsett12TM, as a single application intravaginal drug delivery device for the purpose of controlling the oestrus cycle in cattle, was further evaluated in cycling and non-cycling cows and compared to the CIDR oestrus synchronization program. A total of 350 Friesian or Friesian cross cows in five herds were involved in the trial. The retention rate for the IBD Onsett12TM was significantly lower than the CEDR (65.12% vs. 99.44%, χ2 = 73.528, P = 0.001), and the synchronized conception rate from the CIDR protocol was significantly higher than the IBD Onsett12TM among cycling and non-cycling cows (χ2 = 15.087, P = 0.02). The IBD Onsett12 oestrus synchronization program was effective in inducing fertile synchronized oestrus in some cycling and non-cycling cows, but resulted in a low synchronized conception rate. Manipulation of follicular development and controlling the oestrous cycle length will synchronize oestrus more precisely and control the time of ovulation more exactly to allow a single fixed-time insemination. Controlling the time of new follicular wave emergence and synchronizing the follicular wave status in dairy cows at random stages of the oestrous cycle would provide a more practical and less variable method of synchronization than those of the past. A clinical trial was conducted to control both follicular development and luteal function. Twenty randomly cycling, non-lactating dairy cows were randomly assigned to two treatments; 1) 2 mg oestradiol benzoate injected intramuscularly and 200 mg of progesterone subcutaneously, 9 days before prostaglandin (500 μg cloprostenol) and a second injection of 1 mg oestradiol benzoate 24 hours after prostaglandin treatment (ODB, n = 10). 2) 10 μg busereiin injected 7 days before prostaglandin (500 μg cloprostenol) and a second injection of 10 μg busereiin 48 hours after prostaglandin treatment (GnRH, n = 10). An acute short-acting treatment with progesterone and oestradiol benzoate or busereiin was effective in inducing atresia of the dominant follicle. A new follicular wave emerged earlier in the GnRH treated group than in the ODB treated group (2.22±0.15 vs. 3.60±0.22 days, P = 0.001). An LH surge occurred earlier after a second buserelin treatment on day 9 than after a second oestradiol benzoate treatment on day 10 (4.0 ± 1.0 vs. 22.80 ± 1.20 hour, P = 0.001). The mean time of ovulation after the second oestradiol benzoate or buserelin treatment was not significantly different between the ODB and the GnRH group (1.70 ± 0.30 vs. 1.56 ±0.18, P = 0.692). The proportion of cows that were observed in oestrus was higher in the ODB group than the GnRH group (100% vs. 55.6%, χ2 = 5.630, P = 0.018). In conclusion, progesterone and oestradiol treatment intravaginally or intramuscularlly was effective in synchronizing follicular wave emergence. Administration of oestradiol benzoate 24 hours after prostaglandin given 9 days after an initial progesterone and oestradiol treatment produced the oestrus synchrony, induced an LH surge and provide a degree of synchrony in the time of ovulation. This program showed potential in manipulating follicular development and luteal function and has the possibility allowing fixed-time insemination. However, the efficacy of the EBD Onsett12TM as a single application intravaginal drug delivery device to control the oestrous cycle or as progesterone-releasing device in cattle did not demonstrate satisfactory results when used in these trials. This might arise from the complexity of the drug delivery system. Nevertheless, the concept of delivering multiple drugs at different rates and times may have many benefits to the end user when current design and use problems arc resolved.Item Automatic oestrus detection using a camera-software device and oestrus detector strips in dairy cattle at pasture : a thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Veterinary Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand(Massey University, 2006) Al Alawneh, Ibrahim ZakariaThis study aimed to develop an automated system of oestrus detection building on the widely utilised technique of tail paint, which assists effective and accurate oestrus detection. A camera-software device (CSD) and oestrus detector strips (ODS) were tested in this study. This system has extended the technique of tail painting and modified it so that the CSD can automatically detect, read and interpret paint removal optically using digital technology. A clinical trial involving 480 New Zealand dairy cows grazing pasture was conducted to determine the efficiency of ODS with CSD compared to traditional farm management comprising visual observation and tail paint and to the tail paint technique alone as scored by an observer in the milking shed. Tail paint readings were classified into four categories 1-25%, 26-50%, 51-75%, 76-100% of tail paint removed. Visual observation on the two groups was conducted for 30-45 minutes before morning and afternoon milking and at other times when work was occurring near the cows. Milk samples were collected for progesterone (P4) analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and accuracy of oestrus detection were compared. The confirmed pregnancy diagnosis and artificial insemination (Al) results were used as one standard to allow comparison of the different oestrus detection methods. When P4 results became available, they were integrated into the performance standard (a strong level of agreement was found between P4 results and oestruses that were confirmed by pregnancy diagnosis k=0.74). Standardised reproductive analysis for each group was conducted using DairyWinTM farm records. The test sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and overall accuracy for the CSD group were higher than those for traditional farm management (comprising tail paint and visual observations; p<0.0063; p<0.001, ssp<0.0001, p<0.0001 respectively based on pregnancy diagnosis (PD) outcome for confirmation the occurrence of oestrus; p<0.039, p<0.01, p<0.0001, p<0.0001 respectively based on PD outcome and P4 combined to confirm the occurrence of oestrus). They were also higher than for tail paint use alone (p<0.004, p<0.0001, p<0\05, p<0.0001 respectively; based on PD outcome for confirmation of the occurrence of oestrus). Negative predictive value (NPV) didn't differ between CSD and traditional farm management (p=0.28 based on PD outcome for confirmation of occurrence the oestrus and p=0.55 based on PD outcome and P4 results combined for confirmation of the occurrence of oestrus) and was significantly higher (p<0.0001) when compared to the NPV of tail paint alone. The pregnancy rate and non-return rate (49 day) to first service by artificial insemination were higher (72%, 71% respectively; p<0.05) in the CSD group than that in the control group (39%, 47% respectively). CSD application significantly influenced the proportion conceiving from planned start of mating (PSM) until the end of the artificial breeding season (p= 0.044). The study showed that the CSD system can satisfactorily detect oestrus in seasonally calving dairy herds grazing pasture. With the positive influence that the CSD had on this farm's performance it appears that the CSD offers the potential to increase conception rate in similar herds if Al is timed using the results of CSD oestrus detection.Item A study of some factors affecting the post-partum oestrous interval in suckled angus cows : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Agricultural Science at Massey University(Massey University, 1976) Morris, Stephen ToddThe objectives of this study were to determine the length of interval from parturition to first oestrus and investigate factors that might influence this interval. Sixty-one records were collected in 1975 from the breeding herd at Massey University's No. 3 sheep farm Tuapaka, another 207 records covering the years 1971 to 1973 and 1975 were obtained from the herd of the Whatawhata Hill Country Research Station, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Hamilton. The Massey herd consisted of Angus cows aged 4-years and older while the Whatawhats Angus herd consisted of cows aged 2-years and older. Oestrus was detected at each location by the use of chin-ball mating harnesses attached to entire or vasectomised bulls. Management of the cows followed normal New Zealand hill country practices with the exception that in the Massey herd post-calving treatments were imposed. These treatments were: (i) On the hill throughout the trial (H) (ii) Removed from the pad at birth (PB) (iii) Removed from the pad at 20 days (P20) (iv) Removed from the pad at 4O days (P4O) After calving, cows and calves were grouped into three blocks according to calf age with treatments nested within blocks. The analysis consisted of a study of the relationships between the length of the interval from calving to first oestrus and the nutritional treatments, milk production, cow liveweight changes, and calf variables. The least squares means for post-partum interval to first oestrus were 79.2 days and 74.5 days for the Massey and Whatawhata herds, respectively. The regression of calving date significantly (P<0.01) influenced the post-partum interval in the Massey herd, but the effects of block, treatment, age of dam and sex of calf were non-significant. For the Whatawhata herd, year of record (P<0.001), age of dam (P<0.01) and the regression of calving date (P<0.001) all influenced the post-partum Interval. The sire of calf at foot and sex of calf were non-significant while the regression of cow liveweight change post-calving to mating approached significance (0.05
