• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Massey Documents by Type
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Massey Documents by Type
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    A critical analysis of the methodology of selected major accounting theorists since 1960 : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Agricultural Business in Accounting at Massey University

    Icon
    View/Open Full Text
    01_front.pdf (415.8Kb)
    02_whole.pdf (19.61Mb)
    Export to EndNote
    Abstract
    There has recently been a significant amount of effort and space in the accounting theory literature devoted to attempts to determine a suitable methodological base for accounting. While some may take this to indicate that accounting is intellectually immature, it can also be taken to mean that accounting thinkers are aware of the need for a sound structure on which to develop the discipline: they have attempted to apply accepted scientific methods for research programmes and theory construction. It is important that the scientific methods chosen are themselves sufficiently rigorous and accepted as meeting these needs. This thesis is concerned with examining the work of four accounting writers who appear to have had a significant influence on accounting thought - Raymond Chambers, Yuji Ijiri, Richard Mattessich and Robert Sterling. Although no one year can be held to be more significant than others, 1960, as the beginning of the decade in which most of the work was carried out, has been selected as the boundary of this analysis. The four selected theorists have all produced major works since that date. In order to provide a perspective from which to assess the methodology of the theorists some space is devoted to tracing the thought on scientific theory construction over the last seventy years. It has included a brief survey of the major characteristics of logical positivism, and the work of philosophers who have reacted against that movement - Popper, Kuhn, Feyerabend and others. It is shown that accounting theorists have tended to rely too heavily on a logical positivist position to determine the process by which research is undertaken and theories constructed. If the work of those philosophers of science who have reacted against the positivist position can be accepted as providing a more suitable expression of how knowledge is attained then accounting theorists have erred. With the possible exception of Chambers, from an analysis of theoretical works since 1960, this appears to be so.
    Date
    1978
    Author
    Gaffikin, M. J. R. (Michael John Renny)
    Rights
    The Author
    Publisher
    Massey University
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10179/10412
    Collections
    • Theses and Dissertations
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Copyright © Massey University
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | Copyright Take Down Request | Massey University Privacy Statement
    DSpace software copyright © Duraspace
    v5.7-2020.1
     

     

    Tweets by @Massey_Research
    Information PagesContent PolicyDepositing content to MROCopyright and Access InformationDeposit LicenseDeposit License SummaryTheses FAQFile FormatsDoctoral Thesis Deposit

    Browse

    All of MROCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Copyright © Massey University
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | Copyright Take Down Request | Massey University Privacy Statement
    DSpace software copyright © Duraspace
    v5.7-2020.1