• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Massey Documents by Type
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Massey Documents by Type
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Aspects of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes in sheep : this thesis is presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Veterinary Science at Massey University

    Icon
    View/Open Full Text
    01_front.pdf (480.7Kb)
    02_whole.pdf (10.58Mb)
    Export to EndNote
    Abstract
    The increasing prevalence of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of sheep is causing concern among animal scientists and farmers. In Australia anthelmintic resistance has become widespread since the first case was reported in 1968, and in some districts up to 68% of farms are affected. Benzimidazole resistance is most common, but levamisole and morantel resistance also occurs, and some farms have nematodes resistant to both major anthelmintic groups. Strains of the following species have shown resistance: Haemonchus contortus. Ostertagia circumcincta. Trichostrongylus spp. and, least commonly, Nematodirus spp. In New Zealand, anthelmintic resistance was first reported in 1980, and subsequent surveys found that its prevalence was generally low except on farms with above average anthelmintic usage. The same anthelmintics and nematodes as in Australia were implicated, although resistant Nematodirus spp. were reported more frequently in New Zealand. The most common test used to identify anthelmintic resistance - the faecal egg count reduction (or depression) test - was used in the survey of 15 Manawatu sheep farms which is the subject of this report. On each farm the anthelmintics oxfendazole, ivermectin and levamisole were given by mouth to groups of 12 young sheep, at dose rates of 5.0, 0.2 and 8.0 mg/kg, respectively. Twelve additional sheep were designated as untreated controls. Faecal samples for egg counting were taken from all sheep on the day of treatment and 7 days later. Composite faecal samples from each farm were cultured for identification of larvae present before treatment and, when anthelmintic treatments were deemed unsatisfactory, post-treatment faeces were also cultured for larval identification. Using the simplest method of calculation of faecal egg count reduction, and a cut-off point of 90% or below, there were (respectively) 4,2 and 0 farms with oxfendazole, ivermectin and levamisole resistant strongylate nematodes (excluding Nematodirus spp.). However, supporting evidence for the existence of ivermectin resistant nematodes was weak, and no claim is made that true ivermectin resistance has been detected. On the 4 farms with oxfendazole resistant nematodes, resistant Trichostrongylus spp. were the most common (4 farms), followed by H. contortus (3 farms), 0. circumcincta (2 farms) and Oesophagostomum spp. (2 farms). Oxfendazole resistant Nematodirus spp. were very common, but it was not possible to reach any conclusion about the susceptibility of the Nematodirus spp. present on each farm because of the low numbers of sheep passing Nematodirus spp. eggs and the small numbers of those eggs. Resistant Nematodirus spp. have probably been overlooked in the past and methods to reduce the likelihood of this are suggested. The faecal egg count reduction test is a useful field screening test, but it is difficult to interpret when only a slight degree of anthelmintic resistance is encountered. This is partly due to uncertainty in where the cut-off point should be, and partly to variation in calculation methods. The acceptance of recently formulated standard test protocols for Australia and New Zealand should reduce this problem, but supplementary tests will still be needed in many cases of anthelmintic resistance testing.
    Date
    1989
    Author
    Butler, Andrew Roy
    Rights
    The Author
    Publisher
    Massey University
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10179/11651
    Collections
    • Theses and Dissertations
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Copyright © Massey University
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | Copyright Take Down Request | Massey University Privacy Statement
    DSpace software copyright © Duraspace
    v5.7-2020.1
     

     

    Tweets by @Massey_Research
    Information PagesContent PolicyDepositing content to MROCopyright and Access InformationDeposit LicenseDeposit License SummaryTheses FAQFile FormatsDoctoral Thesis Deposit

    Browse

    All of MROCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Copyright © Massey University
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | Copyright Take Down Request | Massey University Privacy Statement
    DSpace software copyright © Duraspace
    v5.7-2020.1