Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGreaves, LMen_US
dc.contributor.authorManuela, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorMuriwai, EMen_US
dc.contributor.authorCowie, CJen_US
dc.contributor.authorLindsay, CJen_US
dc.contributor.authorMatika, CMen_US
dc.contributor.authorHoukamau, CAen_US
dc.contributor.authorSibley, CGen_US
dc.date.available2017-04-03en_US
dc.date.issued2017-04-03en_US
dc.identifierhttp://www.psychology.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/NZJP-Vol-46-No-1-2017-2.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.citationNew Zealand journal of psychology, 2017, 46 (1), pp. 24 - 35en_US
dc.identifier.issn0112-109Xen_US
dc.description.abstractThe Multidimensional Model of Māori Identity and Cultural Engagement (or MMM-ICE2) is a self-report questionnaire that measures seven distinct dimensions of one’s subjective identity as Māori. Prior research indicates that the scale performs well psychometrically and predicts a wide range of outcomes for Māori peoples. However, the measurement equivalence of the MMM-ICE2 is yet to be assessed. That is, the extent to which the scale provides comparable measurement of the same aspects of identity for all Māori, for instance, across different age groups, for Māori men and women, and for Māori living in different urban or rural regions. Here, we address this gap in the validation of the MMM-ICE2 using Multigroup Confirmatory Factor Analysis to assess the configural, metric, and scalar equivalence of the scale across different demographic groups. We test our models using data from Māori participants who completed the MMM-ICE2 as part of the broader New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study (N = 696). Results indicate that the scale has reasonable measurement equivalence over metric, configural, and scalar assessments across most demographic comparisons. In sum, the results indicate that the MMM-ICE2 provides a valid assessment tool for Māori across a range of contexts, but nevertheless points to ways in which the scale could be improved in future.en_US
dc.format.extent24 - 35en_US
dc.publisherNew Zealand Psychological Societyen_US
dc.relation.urihttp://www.psychology.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/Measurement-Equivalence-across-Diverse-M%C4%81ori-Groups-1.pdfen_US
dc.rightsNew Zealand Psychological Society
dc.titleThe multidimensional model of Māori identity and cultural engagement: Measurement equivalence across diverse Māori groupsen_US
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.citation.volume46en_US
dc.description.confidentialfalseen_US
dc.identifier.elements-id365934
dc.relation.isPartOfNew Zealand journal of psychologyen_US
dc.citation.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1179-7924en_US
pubs.organisational-group/Massey University
pubs.organisational-group/Massey University/College of Health
pubs.organisational-group/Massey University/College of Health/SHORE/Te Roopu Whaariki Research Centre
dc.identifier.harvestedMassey_Dark
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.psychology.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/NZJP-Vol-46-No-1-2017-2.pdfen_US
dc.subject.anzsrc1701 Psychologyen_US
dc.subject.anzsrc1702 Cognitive Scienceen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record