Development of an in vitro assay to screen Agathis australis (kauri) for resistance to Phytophthora agathidicida : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science at Massey University, Manawatลซ, New Zealand

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

DOI

Open Access Location

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Massey University

Rights

The Author

Abstract

The iconic ๐˜ˆ๐˜จ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ข๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ด (kauri) of New Zealand, is under serious threat from kauri dieback disease caused by the soil-borne pathogen ๐˜—๐˜ฉ๐˜บ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฉ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ข ๐˜ข๐˜จ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ข. Infected kauri express symptoms of root and collar rot, bleeding resins at the base of the trunk, yellowing of foliage, canopy thinning, and tree mortality. ๐˜—๐˜ฉ๐˜บ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฉ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ข ๐˜ข๐˜จ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ข was first associated with kauri decline in 1972, where it was initially identified as ๐˜—. ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ฆ however, there was some uncertainty about its significance and taxonomy. The pathogen was officially identified as a new organism in 2008 and was called ๐˜—๐˜ฉ๐˜บ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฉ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ข taxon Agathis until its formal description as ๐˜—๐˜ฉ๐˜บ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฉ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ข ๐˜ข๐˜จ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ข in 2015. This pathogen is easily vectored through root to root contact and mobile zoospores. Management and research has focused on mapping pathogen distribution, reducing spread, improving detection, ๐˜ฆ๐˜น ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ถ conservation and clonal production using tissue culture techniques. In order to gain better understanding of the disease epidemiology and to develop better breeding programmes, a reliable ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ resistance screening assay is required. This research focused on the development of a screening assay using detached leaves from tissue culture material as a means of accelerating screening assays compared to the more labour-intensive root inoculation assays. Foliar inoculations and assessment techniques were initially optimised on kauri leaves from tissue culture lines. The most successful inoculation method involved placing ๐˜—. ๐˜ข๐˜จ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ข-colonised agar plugs on wounded detached leaves. The assay was further tested on 2 year old kauri seedlings. Variation in susceptibility across kauri genotypes and leaf age, and variation in virulence among ๐˜—. ๐˜ข๐˜จ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ข isolates was observed. To further investigate the impact of leaf age on lesion extension, an assay was conducted on detached leaves from six rooted kauri saplings over 5 years of age, across three leaf age groups with ๐˜—. ๐˜ข๐˜จ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ข, ๐˜—. ๐˜ฎ๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ท๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ข, and ๐˜—. ๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฏ๐˜ข๐˜ฎ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ช. Variation in virulence among these ๐˜—๐˜ฉ๐˜บ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฉ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ข species was observed. Leaf necrosis was most severe with young tissue and susceptibility tended to decrease with increasing leaf age. Preliminary studies with 50 kauri clones identified different levels of susceptibility and tolerance across the different genotypes to ๐˜—. ๐˜ข๐˜จ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ข. The methods developed within this study have increased our understanding of the overall response of kauri to ๐˜—. ๐˜ข๐˜จ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ข foliar inoculations. This study demonstrated variation in the susceptability of kauri foliage to ๐˜—๐˜ฉ๐˜บ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฉ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ข inoculation, although no complete resistance was observed. Further work is required to determine if there is a relationship between root and leaf responses which will help establish if ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ genotypic variation can accurately predict natural genotypic variation seen within kauri forests.

Description

Citation

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By